Disagree! I am former military serviceman, if someone wants to fight me I play for keeps. I don’t look for fights in the real world as I am usually a peaceful person, but I know my arts well and I am prepared to defend against anyone who would to try harm me, my family or my friends.
People have collective interests and history.
So does that justify claiming that all people sharing a certain trait are otherwise identical?
Poor logic indeed.
Whites have cucked themselves to diversity and will likely be bred out of existence within a few decades. It sucks but I don’t see whites uncucking themselves any time soon.
I never said that, so no. It is not justified.
Is it possible that the difference, on average, between the earnings of German-Americans and the earnings of Italian-Americans, my be based upon culture, rather than genetics?
Moreover, you noted “a clear correlation.” Please remember, however, that mere correlation should never be confused with causation.
Also, the “average” is not necessarily the same as the median. (For instance, if we were to take the numbers 1, 2, 4, and 97, the average would be 26; but the median would be just 3.)
The people that were involved in the study all consider themselves to be Americans that normally takes about 3 generations but maybe their is still a cultural overhang
you rise some good point I wish I could find the study
The OP makes the claim that “White Americans” are suffering an identity crisis. The omission of any quantification such as a few, some, many, most…and the like implies that all white Americans are painted with this moniker…and you defend that ridiculous notion (and the author) all the way through this thread.
Therefore, what I said stands.
There are several words that sensible debaters should be leery of using or implying:
All, none, always, never…
Oh wow, a Not ALL X Are Like That position
how interesting.
…and quite true.
I am a white American. I have no identity crisis.
How mature of you.
I bet you thought that was clever, didn’t you.
It was fucking hilarious.
If that’s all you have, you have clearly lost the point.
Hint: If you are the only one laughing, it’s not funny.
This is so obtuse as to bog down all statements that speak generally meaningless, particularly when you are addressing a headline to an article rather than the article itself which is kept under 70 characters including spaces to fit better in search engine results pages. In the article, shockingly, the author goes on to elaborate on several points. It’s an amazing art form, the article. You should try it some time, I hear there are collections of these things called magazines where a broadly descriptive title is elaborated on at length, and then in the next page they do it all over again for a different topic.
Or, you know. Carry on being autistic.
Like I said … if you are the only one laughing …
and like I said
You’re not helping your case.
You realise you’re the butt of this joke, right?