The libs must be running around with their hair on fire
Both projects are being funded with money initially allocated to the Defense Department that was redirected by Trump’s executive order.
Use of the money was previously frozen by lower courts while a lawsuit proceeded. Last month, however, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for the use of about $2.5 billion.
For some reason, I found this funny
Conservationists say a wall — and its construction— would be detrimental to wildlife habitat and would block the migration of animals such as bighorn sheep and wolves. Two cases are pending in U.S. courts.
Could there be any greater example of disconnect here? Typical lib.
Lib: “Oh, hi. I don’t want a wall cause of the cactus?”
Con: “Derp, if we build a wall there will be no reason for the park to be overrun by illegals. People can start going back to the park and the cactus will be safer than they were before.”
Lib: “That isn’t true! You have no proof of this! Show me a link!”
Jordahl hoped the courts would step in to protect Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.
The vast park is known for its oddly shaped cactuses that resemble organ pipes and for its many saguaros.
Signs all over the park warn visitors that they might encounter smuggling activity. Until five years ago, large swaths of the park were closed to the public due to dangerous conditions and following the 2002 shooting death of Kris Eggle, a park ranger who died while pursuing suspected drug cartel members.