Itâs important to read between the (western media) lines.
Few people know whatâs really happening inside Ukraine.
Russia wants Ukraine to send more reinforcement to Bakhmut, so that Russia can annihilate them. Itâs a war if attrition, not a war of land conquest.
Dmitri Medvedev has been given a new task to paly the hawk.
That is possible but doesnât seem like something Russia would do considering their entire posture since this war started.
The Wagner Group Liberation Forces will soon be leaving Bakhmut to the Mighty Russian Army that has done nothing in 14 mths. Russian total casualties are around 200 k. The Ukranian Regional Defense Forces in Bajhmut have cost heavy Russian casualties and have lowered troop moral.The Ukrainian Army will eventually force Russia out of Bakhmut.
Ukraine will Liberate Crimea from the Russian Army hordes by destroying the bridges ( both rail and road) cutting off supply routes. Around Kerson and to the East they will cut the rail lines and highway routes into Crimea.
The Azov and Checken fighters are not part of Ukraines Military and donât answer to the Ukraine Military Dept.
Please provide a source that supports your absurd claims with a cited source!
Thanks!
Bakhmut is burning tonight!
Yeah, might as well. The whole city needs reconstruction anyway.
Kiev loses credibility again, again. It was its own drone.
I donât even think Russia has begun to retaliate for the attempted bombing of the Kremlin.
When did Kiev ever have credibility?
The Ghost of Kiev.
The Goat of Kiev.
(There was an incident in a village somewhere in the Donbass where a goat ran amuck, tripping mine wires and killing dozens of Russian soldiers.)
There are other fantastic tales.
There are various news sources on You Tube that report similar casualty numbers.
Alhazerra has information on the Azov Battallion. It is not supported by Zelensky and is part of a far right party with Nazi Idealogy which was funded around 2015 by a Ukranian member of parliament.
None of what you are saying is actually factual in regards to the Azov Battallion! IN fact Zalensky has made public comments about them and is on record.
As far as the actual casualty numbers its in 20âs not 200,000 like you claimed in your original post which is why I asked you to cite your source. Ukrainian losses is reaching close to half a million which is not even close to Russian casualties.
âChecken fightersâ
Also what is "Checken: Fighters? If you mean Chechen Fighters? Then yes you would be correct, they fight with Russian soldiers and are part of the Russian Military force.
You are questioning Aljazerras sources.
Please just cite your source here so we can read it. And Yes I would be questioning Aljazerras sources, they are part of the unreliable West media propaganda machine who often get their reporting wrong or purposely skew their stories in order to paint a favorable picture for their masters.
Here I will give you another example where you are wrong on the AZOV Battalion not being supported by the Zalensky himself. Here are his quotes:
âThe Azov Regiment is not a volunteer (formation), but part of the National Guard.,â Zelensky said. âThey are (part of) the official army of our state. Anyone who wanted to get involved in politics, (left the Azov Regiment). Those who decided to serve in the National Guard of Ukraine became part of the National Guard of Ukraine.â
When it came to the claims of AZOV being a Neo-Nazi fighting unit
Zelensky said that during the first Russian invasion in 2014, when the Azov Volunteer Battalion was formed, some of the statements of volunteers were âquite extreme about Russia,â but that much has changed since then.
âThey were volunteers, and it was their personal view,â the president said.
Not exactly denying it!
This is the source from an article posted over a ago to date
Yes, it has been part of the National Guard .I do agree on that and and Zelensky has decorated some of it members but has no political power.
Its good we can have adult discussions without name calling.Other people on PB should take notice and learn.
I concede your are correct as I have also read that upon further investigation.
Some people here canât even have civil discussions, nor rub two nickles together to form a proper coherent sentence.
Just for the record, when I heard of this at first I didnât believe it either, but after digging further my perspective on them changed.
The country is almost gone from both sides including America
Country âUkraineâ is an artificial concept and it shouldnât have existed from the get-go.
Literally, âUkraineâ simply means âborder areaâ within Russia.
And then there was this? It appears the rhetoric is ramping up to raise the stakes higher!
I donât know. Medvedev, a former President, has a different task overseeing production of military hardware, while playing the hawk and talking big.
Interesting that his maternal grandparents were Ukrainians. Unlike Putin, whose parents were blue color workers (so to speak) from Leningrad, Medvedev has some aristocratic background.
Putin and Medvedev always played two sides of the coin, often disagreeing, while cooperating with and augmenting each other.
Since there is a strong opinion in Russia that Putin is too soft on Ukraine, Medvedev seems to be playing his part as a (supposed) hawk.