The US Deep State or the Khazarian mafia knows that it lost the war in Ukraine.
But they will not give up on the financial dominance they have enjoyed for centuries (Long before the rise of the Rothschilds). Or the Babylonian banking system of usury.
The extent of the Obama administrationâs meddling in Ukraineâs politics was breathtaking. Russian intelligence intercepted and leaked to the international media a Nuland telephone call in which she and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Geoffey Pyatt discussed in detail their preferences for specific personnel in a postââYanukovych government. The U.Sâfavored candidates included Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the man who became prime minister once Yanukovych was ousted from power. During the telephone call, Nuland stated enthusiastically that âYats is the guyâ who would do the best job.
Nuland and Pyatt were engaged in such planning at a time when Yanukovych was still Ukraineâs lawful president. It was startling to have diplomatic representatives of a foreign countryâand a country that routinely touts the need to respect democratic processes and the sovereignty of other nationsâto be scheming about removing an elected government and replacing it with officials meriting U.S. approval.
Washingtonâs conduct not only constituted meddling, it bordered on micromanagement.
The two diplomats also were prepared to escalate the already extensive U.S. involvement in Ukraineâs political turbulence. Pyatt stated bluntly that âwe want to try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing [the political transition].â Nuland clearly had Vice President Joe Biden in mind for that role. Noting that the vice presidentâs national security adviser was in direct contact with her, Nuland related that she told him âprobably tomorrow for an attaââboy and to get the details to stick. So Bidenâs willing.â
Both the Obama administration and most of the American news media portrayed the Euromaidan Revolution as a spontaneous, popular uprising against a corrupt and brutal government.
It was a grotesque distortion to portray the events in Ukraine as a purely indigenous, popular uprising. The NulandââPyatt telephone conversation and other actions confirm that the United States was considerably more than a passive observer to the turbulence. Instead, U.S. officials were blatantly meddling in Ukraine. Such conduct was utterly improper. The United States had no right to try to orchestrate political outcomes in another countryâespecially one on the border of another great power. It is no wonder that Russia reacted badly to the unconstitutional ouster of an elected, proââRussian governmentâan ouster that occurred not only with Washingtonâs blessing, but apparently with its assistance.