Trump’s IG exonerates FBI

[montecresto1]

All you guys ever do is claim fake news when you don’t like the reporting. Nothing new with that.

[montecresto1]

@Joe

Your title is absolutely nothing but pure fake news.

I’m not a news agency, my title is my title. The New York Times is providing the news and you only claim it’s fake because you don’t like it.

[montecresto1]

The NYT article is a whopping three pages, how long does that take you to read?

[Dr_Manhattan]

Did you read the report? No you didn’t! Which not only makes you a liar here yet again but proof positive why everyone here considers you the in house clown show that shouldn’t be taken seriously!

Holy carp dude, your TDS has just been taken to another level!

[montecresto1]

@Rheingold

Not according to everyone who has read the report so far.

Well yes, Trump’s personal lawyer, I mean AG and Republicans. But again that’s a given. Of course the IG found no bias in the investigation, this is why Trump’s personal lawyer, I mean AG has disagreed with it.

[montecresto1]

That’s his opinion, a Trumper defending Trump.

[yeethoven]

The NYT article is fake news.

[montecresto1]

Like I said, a cliche’ invented by the right a few years ago to smear anything they don’t like. The NYT has been around long before you came along and will be around long after you’ve departed.

[asaratis]

@Joe

Your title is absolutely nothing but pure fake news.

Agreed! Monte likes to play Two Card Monte!

[montecresto1]

Trump’s conspiracy theory was laid to rest by the IG, there was no wire tap on Trump’s phone and no spies in his campaign says the report. He concluded no evidence of bias, and that FBI policies were followed in establishing the investigation.

[montecresto1]

@Joe

Here is another hot take from the report that your bullshit fake news organization forgot to mention.

Well that’s just false, it’s right there in their title. You’re the one lying and peddling fake news.

[Dr_Manhattan]

@montecresto1

Well that’s just false, it’s right there in their title. You’re the one lying and peddling fake news.

Uh No! It is you that is full of shit here!

Here is the headliner of the NY Times Article.

“Report on F.B.I. Russia Inquiry Finds Serious Errors but Debunks Anti-Trump Plot”

Here is yours

“Trump’s IG exonerates FBI”

You are busted! Plain and simple! Not only do you insert your own stupid bias in the OP Tagline, but you also try to mislead as well! Can you be anymore retarded?

[montecresto1]

@Babalu

And I forget if I posted it here or elsewhere that the word from Rush and from Sean Hannity was NOT to expect much from the Horowitz report.

Well there you have it, if Sean and Rush said it it’s bank…

[asaratis]

@montecresto1

there was no wire tap on Trump’s phone

Maybe not on Trump’s phone, but there was a wiretap on Carter Page’s phone…in search of information regarding the Trump campaign.

@montecresto1

no spies in his campaign says the report

BS! Comey admitted he sent agents to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

[montecresto1]

Remember when Trump peddled this conspiracy theory…IG says WRONG.

March 4, 2017: Trump Claims Obama Wire-Tapped His Phones - The Moscow Project

[asaratis]

Here’s more on the wiretaps and the crookedness of the FBI in obtaining FISA warrants to do them.

Again…from your NYT article.

Do try to remember that the FBI was looking for links between Russia and the Trump campaign.

Much of the report focused on the documents associated with the wiretapping of Mr. Page. Despite the attention it has received, the wiretap was but a small piece of a sprawling F.B.I. investigation into Russian election interference. Investigators obtained nearly 500 search warrants and interviewed hundreds of witnesses, according to the special counsel’s report.

The FISA court first approved the wiretap in October 2016, about a month after Mr. Page had stepped down from the Trump campaign. The Justice Department obtained three renewals of court permission to eavesdrop on Mr. Page — two under the Trump administration.

Given the highly fraught context of investigating someone linked to a presidential campaign, the report said, the Crossfire Hurricane investigators knew their work would be scrutinized — yet they nevertheless “failed to meet the basic obligation to ensure that the Carter Page FISA applications were ‘scrupulously accurate.’”

The findings on the wiretap application showed that when it mattered most — with the stakes the greatest and no room for error — F.B.I. officials still made numerous and serious mistakes in wielding a powerful surveillance tool. Mr. Horowitz’s discovery calls into question the bureau’s surveillance practices in routine cases.

A chart in the report listed dozens of significant inaccuracies, omissions or assertions that investigators failed to back up in supporting documents in the four applications. To make the case that Mr. Page was probably a foreign agent, they relied on historical information about his contacts with Russians before 2016, and claims about his 2016 interactions with Russians that came from the Steele dossier.

Among the problems: The F.B.I. never told the Justice Department, which thus never told the court that granted permission for the wiretaps, that Mr. Page had for years been providing information to the C.I.A. about his prior contacts with Russian officials — including an encounter cited in the application as a reason to be suspicious of him. That might have made his history less suspicious.

The F.B.I.’s omission of Mr. Page’s contacts with the C.I.A. relates to the criminal referral that Mr. Horowitz made about an F.B.I. lawyer assigned to assist the Russia investigation team. He found that the lawyer, whom people familiar with the inquiry have identified as Kevin Clinesmith, altered an email from the C.I.A. to a colleague during a renewal application. (The report identified neither Mr. Clinesmith nor the C.I.A. by name.)

An F.B.I. official who had to sign an affidavit attesting to the accuracy and completeness of a court filing had specifically asked about any relationship with the C.I.A. Mr. Clinesmith altered the email so that it stated that Mr. Page was “not a source,” contributing to the Justice Department’s failure to discuss his relationship with the C.I.A. in a renewal application.

You should read the ABOUT on The Asset Podcast–obviously devoted to the false narrative that Trump colluded with the Russians.

The Asset

All this has been debunked…yet you depend on it for evidence of your false accusations.

Pitiful to say the least.

[montecresto1]

As though you’ve read anything…

Another tid bit in the IG’s report and ignored by the right, is Ivanka’s friendship with Steele…

[NippalesCage]

Why do liberals refuse to read the document?

Everyone I talk to says “the media gives a good synopsis, there is no reason for me to read it”

[montecresto1]

Yeah, you’re reading it…

[GrassrootsPsycopath]

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.

Barr and Durham need to come down hard. Things could get very ugly if everyone walks away from this.