You will probably say that Himmler never saw any gassing of the â â â â . He was a voyeur having a sexual release watching them âshowerâ Why donât you petition for a posthumous Nobel Prize for Dr. Mengeles eugenics reasearch on twins!!!,
The entire âsworn statementâ is a fabrication. The âViking Divisionâ was and SS Panzer Division which never served in Poland during the war.
The rest is just more of your usual HD bullshit.
The Nuremberg Trials were a sham.
Did he actually perform any experiments - is there any evidence apart from second hand hearsay.
Bit like the soap and lampshades - when we start to investigate - the whole argument collapses.
He was a thoroughly decent and admirable man in every respect whose principal shortcoming was his choice of a name. I never came across even the vaguest shred of documentation that he ever conducted any atrocious procedures or experiments anywhere, ever.
HAMBURG, West Germany â A West German newspaper reported Sunday that it tracked down the wife of Nazi doctor Josef Mengele and that she denied he conducted experiments on â â â â at the Auschwitz concentration camp.
Of course they denied it, most monsters deny their crimes.
Eye witnesses and survivors are first person speakers, not 2nd or 3rd hand and their testimony is direct from the source so it canât be âhearsayâ.
He certainly wasnât a decent man to â â â â at Auschwitz. The survivors of his experiments have a memory loss or were coached by the Allies. He never selected those who go to the gas chamber or to be worked to death at the railroad siding.
You set the bar high enough for being DELUSIONAL that no one would ever reach it.
So if they survived his experiments they canât have been so bad, can they?
That is to dumb to respond to!!!
Truth is neither dumb nor smart - it just is.
So where are the results of these âexperimentsâ?
Never heard of Operation Paperclip?
Cathy OâBrien wrote that Dr Mengele turned up as âDr Green,â a â â â â â â doctor who contributed to the development of MK-Ultra by CIA
So Who really won the war? - ISRAEL.
Eustace Mullins said the 20th century was a â â â â â â century, because â â â â were victorious in all fronts, defeating the goy nations left and right while pretending to be the victim (and getting money, sympathy, political leverage, etc. from the goyim).
The Soviet Union was indeed a â â â â â â paradise where they could put millions and millions of Christians to death with impunity; the leaders were all â â â â except Gorbachev who descended from the Habsburgs and whose job was to break up the defunct empire. It became defunct because so many Slavs were killed.
Millions of Germans were killed AFTER the war ended.
â â â â wanted to kill off Germans from the face of the earth.
â â â â destroyed Russia and killed tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians, so they figured they could get away with it.
Thatâs what the Morgenthau Plan was all about.
A FACTUAL APPRAISAL OF THE âHOLOCAUSTâ BY THE RED CROSS
There is one survey of the â â â â â â question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germanyâs concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.
This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur lâactivitĂ© du CICR en faveur des civils dĂ©tenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by FrĂ©dĂ©ric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.
The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.
The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which â â â â were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as âCivilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, âSchutzhĂ€ftlingeâ), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forcesâ (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, âwere placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.â (P.74).
The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and âfrom February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisonsâ (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from â â â â â â internees.
No Evidence Of Genocide
One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: âIn the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ⊠In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp âŠâ (Vol. III, p. 83).
Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned â â â â they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against âthe barbarous aerial warfare of the Alliesâ (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the â â â â â In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that â â â â â like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the â â â â â â doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) â Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. âNot only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlargedâ (Vol. III, p. 594).
PDF of Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its activities during the Second World War.
ICRC Report of 1948 Scan of the pages 641 â 657 of Volume I plus summary of other pages in the Volumes II and III on the same topic.
https://forum.codoh.com/download/file.php?id=1215
Zyklon labels from Dachau concentration camp used as evidence at the Nuremberg trials. The first and third panels contain manufacturer information and the brand name. The centre panel reads âPoison Gas! Cyanide preparation to be opened and used only by trained personnelâ.
Above is from wikipedia.
Didnât the holo-hoaxters admit there were no gas chambers in Dachau?
So, what was Zyklon B for, if not for killing lice and fleas?
Thereâs no limit to the lies these two will propagate and no amount of fact will ever dissuade them.
The cost of the new crematorium at Dachau, however, included the construction of four specifically-designed gas chambers for disinfestation <see photos 14 and 27 above> , each supplied with the identical Degesch Zyklon-B dispensers that had been proposed for Auschwitz⊠<photo 30> The disinfestation chambers are small, narrow, and with low ceilings. They are better suited for treating clothing, bedding material and blankets than for exterminating human beings. Once disinfestation of the material was completed, the operators would simply need to open the outer doors and let the remaining, but very volatile, gas diffuse without risk into the atmosphere. The four parallel chambers in the Dachau crematorium are unquestionably gas chambers designed specifically for exterminating lice and other insects.
A larger room adjacent to the four disinfestation chambers is also a gas chamber but this one was designed specifically for homicidal purposes. Any doubts that this chamber is a gas chamber are rapidly dispelled upon viewing the exhaust vents on the ceiling of the room <photo 31 > , the exhaust chimney on the roof <photo 32 > , and the metal doors that are identical in design to those used by the disinfestation gas chambers <photo 33 > <photo 34> . It would appear that the fake shower heads on the ceiling of the chamber <photo 35> , the sign over the door stating Brausebad (shower room) <photo 36> and the smooth brick finish simulating tiling < see photo 41 below> were part of an elaborate ploy to make the victims believe they were going to take a bath after having deposited their clothes in the passageway connecting the disinfestation chambers with the homicidal chamber.
Further evidence of its design as a homicidal chamber are the two bin-like drawers leading from the gas chamber to the exterior. <photo 37> <photo 38> <photo 39> . The only possible explanation for these bins is that they were designed to receive the granules of Zyklon-B (or some other lethal volatile poison) from a small tin. The person in charge of a homicidal gassing need only don a gas mask, open the two bins, and dump part of a small tin of Zyklon-B into each one. Having done this, the operator would close the bins, which are protected from interference from the victims by a protective grating, <photo 40> <photo 41> and wait a few minutes until all the victims were dead. At this point, the powerful mechanical extractor could be energized sending the poisonous fumes into the atmosphere, drawing fresh air through a small hatchway located above the bins. The bodies could then be moved into the mortuary chamber to await incineration in the adjoining crematory furnaces.
The question arises of the difference between the method of dispensing of Zyklon-B to the disinfestation chambers and to the extermination chamber. Quite simply: the exposure time and concentration of hydrogen cyanide gas for killing insects is considerably higher than that which is needed to kill humans. According to the manufacturers of the product, it only requires 0.3 grams per cubic meter to kill human beings, whereas concentrations of up to 10 grams per cubic meter were routinely employed to destroy insects. [22] The relative ease with which it is possible to kill humans with low concentrations of hydrogen cyanide makes it simpler and less expensive to use the drawer-like bins in the homicidal chamber rather than to use the costly Degesch dispensers. Additionally, the bins would allow for other volatile poisons to be employed as suggested by Rascher in his letter to Himmler. [see below]
A suspicious and heretofore unexplained structure bears mentioning. What appears to be a wooden screen blocking the area where the bin-like drawers are located on the eastern wall of the new crematorium ( Baracke X ) can be observed in photographs taken immediately after the camp was liberated by the Americans. <photo 42> <see also photo 17 above> . This screen seems to be about 16 feet wide and six feet deep. It does not appear to have any roof-covering. If it was indeed a screen, it would have allowed operation of the bin-like drawers by one or more perpetrators without any possibility of being observed by any casual bystanders.
Actual Use of the Gas Chambers:
It is almost certain that the fumigation or disinfestation chambers were used for their designed purpose. Bishop NeuhĂ€usler quotes Micheletâs Street of Liberty :
ââŠa good use for the gas chamber and for the poison gas provided. When an epidemic of typhoid fever [The author is in error. He surely meant typhus which is borne by lice. - HWM] broke out in the camp, in the winter of 1944, the Capo of the disinfestation commando suggested to the camp leader that they use the cyclon gas to disinfect the rags and tatters which lay in heaps in the yard of the disinfection barracks and were dangerous bearers of lice. The experiment proved to be a successful undertaking. However The gas chamber was not used for this. Instead small rooms located at the western [actually southern - HWM] exit of the crematorium, as well as one other camp-building used generally for disinfections served this purpose.â [23]
The official historian of Dachau, Paul Berben, further states:
âDuring the winter of 1944-5, the disinfection squad, under authority of the chief S.S. doctor, started disinfecting, by gas, the piles of vermin ridden clothes.â [24]
Although the administrative authorities at Dachau, some famous prisoners and many historians are quick to point out that the large gas chamber at the camp was never used for homicidal purposes, there is at least some evidence to the contrary. Bishop NeuhÀusler, for example, states:
âAlso behind the wire fence was the camp crematorium . At first it was housed in a wooden barrack, later in a stone building built by Polish Catholic priests, to whom the building trade had been taught. This crematorium was located in a small forest on the west side quite close to the camp. The prevailing wind was from the west and consequently the smell of burning corpses filled the camp, reminding of their approaching end and adding immeasurably to their despair.â
âWith the new crematorium a gas chamber was also connected. The whole construction of the crematorium with its gas chamber was completed in 1943. It contained an âundressing roomâ, a âshower bathâ, and a âmortuaryâ. The showers were metal traps which had no pipelines for a supply of poisonous gas. This gas chamber was never set in action in Dachau. Only the dead were brought to the crematorium for âburningâ, no living for âgassingâ.â [25]
https://phdn.org/archives/www.mazal.org/archive/documents/Dachau-article.htm
No. Gas chamber narratives have changed a number of times, because they are all made-up fairy tales.
I think the last version was that the âdeath campsâ or Vernichtungslager were those built in Poland.