This will not end well

We already showed this to be a lie the last time you propagated it, so why are you repeating it?

I always find it interesting when you folks make scriptural claims that can never be found anywhere but on Antisemitic websites.

This claim for example canā€™t be substantiated by any unbiased and/or academic source anywhere.

Hmm what to make of it when the author is a completely discredited known Anti Semite and Holocaust Denier?

Let me think on that.

You know what the reference was about. The continued use of the figure 6 Million.

Discredited by whom ? This guy was young chemist and due to a report which concluded in a contrary opinion to that of the official narrative about gas chambers he was then hounded. Similar parallels to the current time with the likes of Tommy Robinson warning about islam but TPTB donā€™t want to hear of it, so they hound him and lock him up, what he has to say just doesnā€™t fit their script.

It appears in this argument you have the ability to look but regardless of what is presented you will always have a default position of not wanting to see. A child can see some of the embellishments and anomalies in the official story and if it were a detective on a murder case he would be encouraged to continue investigating if he finds some lies or errors in a suspectā€™s story. His commanding officer doesnā€™t warn him off and say nothing to see here ( well not unless he is in the pocket of a Clinton ) but Iā€™m sure you get my drift.

When there is an extreme reluctance and imposed prohibition on questioning any historical event, it would automatically raise suspicions in most people who just want the truth but for this event the blanket refusal to even contemplate that there could be some issues with the official story is just bizarre.

I think it is because psychologically some people just canā€™t bear the thought that they may have been duped and itā€™s easier and more comfortable for them to just continue to defend a compromised position rather than be open to review it like they have no prior knowledge or preconceived ideas. Or worse still they are just paid to tell blatant lies.

1 Like

The only blindness here is your own. Stalin murdered over 30 million of his own people, 20 million in the Ukraine alone and many were ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– 

Lots of numbers have been used innumerable times throughout history, one event in Russia has next to nothing to do with events a half century later in Nazi Occupied Europe.

The only place your author has any credibility is with Nazis and their collaborators.

TWR donā€™t fear the truth. Your position is always one of being a know all and if it makes you happy carry on.

1 Like

Iā€™m not the one who seems to have a problem accepting the truth here.

No you are wrong. I believed the full story most of my life but once I picked up on some discrepancies it made me have doubts and it gave more meaning to why my Grandfather shunned his own parents.

I donā€™t know the full truth and neither do you but Iā€™m not afraid and open to look.

List the discrepancies as documented by credible sources.

Oh come onā€¦unless itā€™s from the holocaust museum you flame all sources. You know what they are if you really want to look. Wash out your eyes with some Nazi soap.

Considering this is how you acted yesterday when I asked you to provide an original source for another claim I expected this time around.

I use multiple sources from dictionaries, academic works, the US military, and Encyclopedias not just ā€œHolocaust Museumsā€.

Maybe you should consider taking your own advice and try seeing the world through something other than Nazi blinders.

For the believers I could say Jesus himself and it would still be scoffed at as a legitimate source.

You only have to look at how David Irving was crushed to realise something is amiss and they are still doing similar deeds around the world now about who and what can be discussed. Iā€™ll leave it there.

In other words you canā€™t support any of your claims.

No surprise.

Yes whateverā€¦ Itā€™s also no surprise that you donā€™t have an issue with the subject being made off limits in many countries and says everything about your character. Freedom to question is only ok if it is first approved by ā€œThe Ministry Of Truthā€.

Iā€™ve been down this road before there is information out there and you no doubt have access to a search engine.

You people donā€™t ask questions you make baseless allegations and claims you cannot support and spread lies that have been proven so for decades swearing they are truth.

You have no idea what I feel about those laws. I spent most of 3 years living under them and never could grasp how they were in any way necessary or good.

Those that know me know I am opposed to hate crimes laws of every sort. Those like you make baseless assumptions.

I have mentioned the prohibition on that particular event and this is the first time you have referred to it, so what am I supposed to think ? Itā€™s also not just about the absurdity of the generic hate crime laws but the topic itself has itā€™s own laws in many countries, so this naturally impedes the sharing of information on the subject and is judge and jury as to what is and what isnā€™t credible sources. It doesnā€™t matter about decades of story telling, get real we know governments bury all kinds of crap for decades, of course because it is in our best interests.
It is my opinion that there are some clear issues and back and forth comments is just nonsense and will never go any way to try and settle this matter while one half of the argument is constantly under threat of arrest/imprisonment.

The ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  Museum at the Torelance Center (Interesting name, isnā€™t it?) in Moscow says nothing about ā€œholocaust.ā€

The exhibits say many ā– ā– ā– ā–  were killed during WWII, but the culprits are Slavs. I wonder why.

If the Scripture is ā€œantisemitic,ā€ then Jesus must be an anti-semite.
What did Jesus call the ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– 

What did he call the ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  cite book, chapter, and verse.

You keep making this claim over and over and have never provided any evidence from any credible source to support it. Why is that?