“Second Empire.” LOL
Nothing I post is a lie but equally nothing I post is original - it is ALL sourced on the internet from what I regard as trustworthy sources. So when you accuse me of lying, what you are actually doing is calling out my sources.
So I will ask you again - please tell me which of the following are liars.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,
Orthodox Christian books
Paul Craig Roberts
Barbara Lerner Spectre
NFO news
And as I have said on numerous occasions, I am happy to let my viewers come to their own conclusions.
When the “article” you recommend starts out with, “Editor’s Note: The alleged Holocaust is the most over publicized non-historical event in history” an honest person immediately knows the rest that follows is going to be garbage as well.
You are a hate filled retard trolling the sewers of the internet for lies that support your own hatred of ■■■■ irrespective of any fact.
1 Like
Naaa… you are doing the standard deception of adding a little truth to alot of lies and then calling it all truth. There is nothing in Solzhenitsyn’s writings that condemn ■■■■■ You put him at the top of your list to add credibility to your lies, hoping no one will check. But the check was done long ago. You post lies. Pure and simple.
1 Like
Really?
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of the communist revolution: that ■■■■ were as much perpetrators of the repression as its victims
whispers of his supposed anti-Semitism began floating around, probably because he had sometimes hinted at the very prominent role of ■■■■ in both financing and leading the Bolshevik Revolution, and afterward staffing the NKVD and administering the Gulag labor camps
“The Truth is Hate, to Those Who Hate the Truth.”
Identifying some bad guy as a ■■■ is not the same as your wholesale hatred and lies about the ■■■■ as a people.
You pretend that it is. But it’s not.
Also, under the Tzar, ■■■■ suffered. They - like anyone - would favor a new power to overthrow the one that was oppressing them. Like many naive supporters of Lenin’s and Stalin’s insanity, they eventually were sacrificed in the fires of revolution along with Christians and useful idiot atheist liberals.
Your linked article has not one quote from solzhenitsyn that damns ■■■■■ Not one. Clearly, you are posting for illiterates, deceiving them into thinking that you are honestly posting - in this case - writings from Solzhenitsyn that agree with you. You post lies for morons to swallow.
2 Likes
Have you actually read 200 years together - let me know if you want me to link it.
Heres one quote - there are many more where that came from.
Are you saying here and now that Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote the words you have shown as a quote in the picture?
Or did you simply juxtapose words from someone else beside a picture of Alexander Solzhenitsyn?
I have not read “two hundred years together”. But the historian Richard Pipes has. I have thoroughly read Pipes’ history of the Russian Revolution. And I trust his scholarly review.
Richard Pipes reviewEdit
The book has been described by historian Richard Pipes of Harvard University as “a conscious effort to show empathy for both sides,” and exonerating ■■■■ for responsibility for the revolution: “No, in no way can it be said that ■■■■ ‘made’ the revolution of 1905 or 1917 as it was not made by another nation taken as a whole”. At the same time Pipes notes that Solzhenitsyn is “too eager to exonerate czarist Russia of mistreating its ■■■■■■ subjects, and as a consequence is insensitive to the ■■■■■ predicament”.[23] In Richard Pipes’ opinion, the book absolves Solzhenitsyn from the taint of antisemitism, although he thinks the author’s nationalism prevents him from being fully impartial, and that Solzhenitsyn is using outdated and inadequate sources. Pipes asserts that Solzhenitsyn failed to consider the “poisonous atmosphere in which ■■■■ lived for generations in the Russian empire (an atmosphere originating in Russian Orthodox and nationalist circles)”. In particular, Pipes notes that Solzhenitsyn failed to discuss The Protocols of the Elders of Zion , a Russian anti-Semitic forgery.[23][24]
There is no evidence there that Solzhenitsyn shares your lies, stupidity, or ignorance in Two Hundred Years Together.
Heres some more(Chapter 15 - 200 years together)
From the 40s of the twentieth century onwards, after Communist rule broke with international Judaism, ■■■■ and communists became embarrassed and afraid, and they preferred to stay quiet and conceal the strong participation of ■■■■ in the communist revolution, however the inclinations to remember and name the phenomenon were described by the ■■■■ themselves as purely anti‐Semitic intentions.
However the fact is proven: ■■■■■■ renegades have long been leaders in the Bolshevik Party, heading the Red Army (Trotsky), the VTsIK (Sverdlov), the two capitals (Zinoviev and Kamenev), the Comintern (Zinoviev), the Profintern (Dridzo‐Lozovski) and the Komsomol (Oscar Ryvkin, and later Lazar Shatskin, who also headed the International Communist Youth).
Renegades…not from the body of rational ■■■■■ According to Pipes, he writes about Russian renegades as well. There is no wholesale blame placed solely on ■■■■■ You are posting lies.
That sir, is obvious - let me know if you want the link.
Richard Pipes was born in Cieszyn, Poland to an assimilated ■■■■■■ family (whose name had originally been spelled “Piepes”)
Exactly so - but they were ■■■■■■ and had a leading role in Bolshevism, That also clarifies my attitude to ■■■■ - I do not hate all ■■■■■ just the bad ones - unfortunately I also believe in collective responsibililty
You will not find a more knowledgeable yet accessible author of the Russian Revolution. He’s not for your illiterate pukes though.
Most were men too. So that kinda paints me as responsible too… if I use your ridiculous criterion.
Let’s get back to this. Is your post declaring that the words on the left of the picture represents the view of Alexander Solzhenitsyn as written in Two Hundred Years Together?
What page, chapter, and paragraph?
Probably all of them.
I think it is odd that your post clearly implies that Solzhenitsyn is blaming ■■■■■ And yet on the Solzhenitsyn we page, we have this.
In Two Hundred Years Together , Solzhenitsyn emphatically denies (in Chapters 9 and 14) that the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were the result of a “■■■■■■ conspiracy” (just as he had earlier forcefully criticized the extreme nationalists who were and are obsessed with Freemasons and ■■■■■
Please provide the page, chapter where your quote can be found.
Look at what I found on Solzhenitsyn’s site.
Meanwhile, readers need to be forewarned that any and all English versions available on the Internet (with two important exceptions listed below) are illegal, pirated, and/or entirely unauthorized; often poorly and loosely translated; and redact passages, and indeed whole chapters, that apparently do not support the prejudices of those behind these illegal editions.
So… what translation are you using and repeating illegally here on the forum?
I don’t find your quote in any of the legal translations on that site.
@Magog
One way or another, we are going to get to the truth here. Either you are illegally pirating a false translation and defaming Solzhenitsyn or you are lying or both.
Meanwhile, readers need to be forewarned that any and all English versions available on the Internet (with two important exceptions listed below) are illegal, pirated, and/or entirely unauthorized; often poorly and loosely translated; and redact passages, and indeed whole chapters, that apparently do not support the prejudices of those behind these illegal editions.
Am I out of bounds @Patriot ?