Documented facts are always easier to find to support any so called âOFFICIALâ narrative.
On that basis anything that is produced as opposing evidence generally meets a wall and the common theme is to discredit it vociferously to send home the message not to go against the flow.
So regardless of what Mag and any so called âConspiracy Nutâ provides as evidence it will always be considered B.S. because most people prefer to rely on âtrustedâ government sources.
The internet has been a real thorn in the side of the establishment as prior to that it was difficult to hear about all the accidental deaths and suicides of the conspiracy nuts but now it doesnât take too much research to join dots and at least see some smoke. Keeping a confirmed sighting of the fire out of view is a full on job for most governments.
My personal opinion is that there is a lot of validity in @Magogâs claims. The main difference between him and I is that he can be bothered to argue with you. So am I a conspiracy theory nut too and should I be censored if I dare say anything? By the way, my background is Physics too. But I donât have to shout about it from the rooftops.
The short answer is NO. It all needs tearing down and a proper shakeup !!
Yes, the US government is capable! Very good video, thanks.
Thatâs because the Tories have been infiltrated by about 200 Lib Dems.
Take no notice of him, he is crazy old fool ! 
I think after the army he was involved in food standards, trying to improve labeling and remove toxic crap from the food chain, so he must definitely be a nut job as no government would allow toxic substances into the food chain would they ?!
And no government (especially the US) would deliberately make their citizens ill from the poison in food just so that they can bolster the pharmaceutical industry to be fed more drugs to make them âbetter!â
He has made it into the Encyclopedia Of American Loons⌠The discrediting tool or fact ?
This is the kind of thing you find so often.
http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013/01/378-albert-stubblebine-rima-laibow.html
EDIT: was involved in MKULTRA the existence of which was denied for some time.
Talking of old fools, what do you think the average age is here? 
But itâs not just me. Just read through the 9/11 thread.
But I am beginning to understand why you think Magog is aokay.
You would think the Pentagon would have some decent cameras rolling around the clock.
No, actually I canât. I cannot see your face or read your mind when you post. You are an in your face poster, I take everything you post seriously. If you want someone to understand that you are joking, there is a plethora of emoticons to express your mood and/or intentions.
And it is odd that you think putting down international aggression militarily is even remotely the same as socialized medicine. You wouldnât even have socialized medicine if it werenât for the security that our military power provides you.
About 62 ish I reckon.
I agree Stu, but the good thing about Brexit is that it has shown MPs true colours. Unfortunately most seem to be yellow or red. Brexit has proven that there are some real conservatives who support democracy
Yes it has but they are not nearly as maverick as I would like personally.
Iâm not going to reopen the discussion here, but everything that man says has been refuted. EVERYTHING.
Of course it has Sam. That is my point. He is crazy old fool . Itâs funny they trusted him for 32 years prior to him becoming a crazy old fool.
To believe in the Internet conspiracies one has to believe that millions of Americans, both in government and civilians, were in on it and the cover up, many of whom gave their lives to protect it. That is ludicrous.