Do you think that what mother Theresa is doing was planned all along?
Kind of but I don’t think it was from the very beginning…
I believe it was hatched not by May but by a group who have much more to lose with Brexit and they have talked her into this strategy. If the plan is voted in they can work with it as there is still much control of the U.K. from outside influences. If it is rejected she can justify a re-vote hoping for a remain outcome which definately suits the powers in charge as they can truly persecute the U.K.
May appeared to go it alone in secret just before her Brexit committee came up with the official plan. We only realised she had seemingly been working alone when she rejected her committees plans and released the one she has been working on in secret. This was when Davis left his Brexit secretary position.
I don’t think she has prepared this plan of her own volition but she is certainly exercising it well !
And notice how eerily quiet the E.U. has been in news broadcasts. The E.U. heads and the news corps are ensuring they say nothing to antagonise a fight back from Parliamentarians or the British people who might need to vote again to stay under the rule of the European Parliament.
I like to think that there is a hidden power ‘‘behind the curtain’’ that is fighting to leave.
Mays plan was devised as a stalking horse designed to fail and lull EU into a false sense of security.
At least she can say she tried and trot off to Brussels with a mega payoff and pension
And TPTB can claim plausible deniabilty.
So whos behind the curtain? you probly won’t agree but maybe the royal family?
Maybe follow the money and look a bit closer to home? Her husband Philip’s company has holdings of $1.4 trillion. They bought shed loads of shares in Lockheed Martin just before May authorised the bombing of Syria without parliamentary approval.
Looks like Jen has hammered the nail in some way. It is conceivable that May’s hubby will have a huge influence on her actions but of course without showing any conflict of interest in his companies dealings.
I think more importantly there is a fraternity who steer things at such a high level that they need the agreement of the heads of state to do their puppet work.
Royal Family ?
Rothschilds ?
Bilderburg group ?
It is seriously difficult to know absolutely. I certainly don’t have the answer.
No-one will ever know - we can only speculate and try to join a few dots.
But I do think there is more than one power and they are not necessarily working together.
I also believe the Royals are much more influential than we realise
Also Philip May once had his own political ambitions but they decided one politician in the family was enough. He was an ardent EU supporter back in the 80’s. I think this country is being run by Philip May to fulfil his own interests and those of his banker chums.
What do they care what sort of world they leave behind? They don’t have children and grand children. Andrea Leadsom was on the money before she was promptly silenced.
They will tax you by the kilometer. The State of Oregon is developing and plans to implement such a tax (per mile) to restore their revenue loss due to the increase in high mileage and electric cars.
What’s with this newly applied restriction limiting us to three posts until someone replies? That’s ridiculous, given that there were twenty something posts to consider since my last visit.
I think that what is being encouraged is replying to multiple posts by way of multiple quotes in a single post. I get this suggestion from the robot quite often.
That is not what happened. I tried to make four posts in a row (without someone else posting in between my posts) and it refused to accept the post. I am often here at times when nobody else is here. It is (or rather has been) common to come here and find 20-30 posts since my last visit and respond to half a dozen or more of them. Now, I can only respond to three, because I’m alone in the thread at the time.
I expect it’s to combat flooding, but it has this stifling effect on ordinary conversation as a consequence. I thought the whole by invitation only move from the other forum was to stop flooding and other abuses by the invading troll army, which should have made this precaution completely unnecessary.
Yes you can, but it is a pain in the ass to do and it makes replies by each person awkward. Combining quotes for a combined response is only appropriate if they are all on the same point.
I don’t disagree with that. I’m merely expressing my opinion as to the intended purpose of the new constraint. All posts in any one thread are supposed to be on the same topic. This too hardly ever happens throughout a thread.
Perhaps it should be excluded from “The Rabbit Hole” as it really has no intended topic. It is what it is.
Yes, but even the same topic usually has numerous different points.
You are right … random topic threads such as this one should be exempt. And where I encountered it was in the closed group chat thread. It most certainly should not apply there.
“They” are smarter than that. They would keep the fuel tax as well as add the mileage tax. Gas users would pay twice just to punish them for emitting CO2.
This gives me joy like watching the 4th of July fire works! Exciting!
Stunning pictures of the protests over this weekend! Its likely Macron will lose his presidency over this! EU steps in with their armored vehicle the first in modern history!
