Wow! That’s a lot of assumption in a very short post.
And where is your evidence to support that…?
1 Like
I think this is when they start posting lunatic conspiracy theories about pizza and pedophiles.
1 Like
Not really, the context of your hyperbolic statements you provided here on this site so far is proof enough to know that you are clueless on the subject matter! Not once can you cite source material to support any argument you so falsely assert.
You keep flapping those gums but it doesn’t change the fact that Flynn lied… and admitted to it 
What the hell are you talking about? The phone call is the basis for everything!
Flynn called the foreign minister after Obama kicked out the Russians from the consulates. They did it while Flynn was in Dominican Republic so they could listen in and use it against him. Flynn broke no laws. It was all a set up!
This is what launched Obamagate!
The basis is the Logan act, not the phone call. The entire case was predicated that Flynn violated a law that no person in the history of the law itself has ever been charged with violating. The phone call was merely a impetus to justify this violation.
Think about it another way, John Kerry has violated this same law while Trump was president and still no one held him to the same standards as was Flynn.
Holy shit guy - wtf do you think I just said?
IT’S ALL REAL
IT’S ALL COMING OUT
T R E A S O N
I am just explaining the logic applied here for justifying in charging Flynn.
Of course it is! But don’t tell that to a partisan communist hack!
I understand that but your post made it seem like the call was irrelevant and that is not the case at all. Had Flynn not made that call, which they knew that he would, they would not have been able to entrap him.
That’s why I was saying the call is the basis for everything we are seeing right now which is insane.
Without using the Logan act as a back stop, the phone would not have been justification for interviewing Flynn in the first place, and that was my point.
As I said, I understand that but had the dude not picked up the goddamn phone none of this, at least as we know it, would have happened.
I don’t know, that is debatable seeing that they had it in for him since his Obama days and probably would have found another way to entrap him. Remember when Obama fired him? Then it took the actions of Admiral Rogers to get this ball rolling? My Guess is that Flynn knew where the bodies were buried and he had to be removed at all costs!
One indictment under the Logan Act was issued but never prosecuted.
Earlier this year, Barr assigned Jeffrey B. Jensen, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri (and a former FBI agent himself), the task of reviewing Flynn’s case and in particular how Flynn’s FBI interview was handled. Jensen concluded, based on his review, that the case against Flynn was fatally flawed. Jensen found that there was no valid reason for the FBI to interview Flynn in January 2017 after the FBI found no illegal activity in the course of their initial investigation. In other words, Flynn was set up.
1 Like
While I disagree with you politically I do appreciate the fact that you recognize that Flynn not only made the call, but that he lied about it after the fact while under investigation by the FBI. He is an admitted liar.
Now the judge is getting in on the act and is ruffling feathers with this lengthy response. According to Sydney Powell the Amicus brief has no place in this court.
That is rich coming from someone who consistently lies is now trying to play the moral position by accusing another of being a liar? Man! What a hypocrite you are! Your words means absolutely zero!