This is well worth the time to read. Known as in stone documented historical truth.
Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box – Part 3
The violent nature of Blacks. First rationale for Apartheid** – By Mike Smith
Many white South Africans feel guilty about Apartheid, they feel as if they actually did something evil or bad, but that is totally wrong.
Ex president De Klerk apologised for Apartheid and so did the Dutch Reform Church Dominee, Swanepoel who also started pulling out his intestines about Apartheid and apologised on behalf of the entire church without any mandate from anyone of the congregation.
So when such “leaders” tell us how wrong we were, then we tend to believe them. But let us look at the truth.
Anyone who knows the history of South Africa will know that nobody suffered more on the soil of South Africa, no one has bled as much as the Afrikaners and their descendants the Boers. The Whites of South Africa and specifically the Afrikaners have nothing to be sorry for. In fact the Blacks owe them a tremendous gratitude and a gigantic apology for the way they treated Whites in the last 350 years.
The Afrikaners have a song that is taught to all Afrikaans kids from the crib and that every Afrikaner today knows. The name of this song is called, “Siembamba”. The lyrics are so heavy that I almost do not want to repeat it here. But it goes like this,
“Siembamba, mama se kindjie,
Siembamba, mama se kindjie
–draai sy nek om, gooi hom in die sloot;
trap op sy kop dan is hy dood.”
For our international readers I will freely translate and then explain.
“Siembamba, mommies little child,
Siembamba, mommies little child,
–Wring his neck, throw him in the ditch,
Step on his head, then he is dead…”
Believe it or not…this is a song Afrikaans people sing to their children while rocking them to sleep!
It records the brutality of the Xhosas who would indiscriminately kill white women and white babies during the nine Kaffir wars. Black men are mostly cowards who are only brave when in packs. They actually seldom engage in head on confrontation with White men. When they attack it is always in groups, while people are asleep. Their preferred targets are the elderly, women and children.
A common myth amongst foreigners and South Africans alike is that they think that before the White man came to Africa, Blacks lived in peace and harmony with nature and with each other.
This harmony with nature is not entirely wrong. It is the perception of “In harmony with nature” that is misunderstood.
People want to believe that nature is pure and good and that the lion lies with the lamb, but reality is far removed from that. When one sees how hyenas tear a live animal apart, how a praying mantis bites the head off her mate after copulation how the Streptococcus bacteria can destroy human flesh, one is left with a feeling that nature can be very cruel.
Nature amongst African blacks have always been very cruel. Blacks who supposedly lived in tune with nature were regularly eaten by lions, crocodiles, bitten by snakes, stung by scorpions and their numbers controlled by insects like the mosquito (Malaria) or the Tsetse fly(sleeping sickness). Yellow fever and Cholera were other forms of nature to control the numbers of Blacks…
But it has to be said that before the white people came to Africa, the most effective way Blacks controlled their own populations were with genocidal tribal wars…and cannibalism.
Let me point out some of the psyche of the Blacks in order to try and understand his petty jealousy and envy.
Amongst the Black communities it is not allowed for individuals to show ingenuity or individualistic prosperity. The moment one Black person starts to rise a little above the others, he will be the first one to be hammered down by the community like a nail in a wooden floor. Those who do prosper are ostracised by their black tribes and it will be said of them that they are not real blacks that they are whites with a black skin…
That mentality still persists to this day, but this petty envy is accompanied with an inbred, inextinguishable, brutality that the whites of Africa came face to face with and learned about the hard way.
Ever since the white man set foot on South African soil, he has been shocked and horrified at the brutality of the blacks. No matter how much the whites wanted to believe in the “equality of man”, they were sadly confronted only with the brutality and reality of Stone Age savages.
Blacks of central Africa sold other blacks they have conquered into slavery to Arabs, other black tribes and also to whites. The moment one tribe had a bit more than the others, they would be prone to a nocturnal raid by neighbouring tribes who would kill all the men, rape the women and children, steal the cattle and incorporate the women and children into their own tribes.
Tribes who were not strong enough would flee the area. In sub Saharan Africa it meant that nobody wanted to flee north, because they knew it was a desert where they could not survive. So the only way was to flee south. The weakest of the weakest tribes were right in the front, followed by a slightly stronger tribe, followed by ever increasing stronger tribes further north, driving the weaker ones south.
Roundabout the same time that whites first settled in South Africa, black tribes first entered South Africa. They were contemporary settlers of the area now known as South Africa. In some areas whites were the first and in others, blacks were the first.
Blacks moving South and Whites moving north looking for better grazing for their cattle eventually met at the Fish and the Kei rivers around 1770…About 120 years after the Whites first (permanently) settled at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652 . To put it into perspective, it was about the same time as New York was founded in the USA.
Who were these Blacks they met at the Fish River? They were the Xhosa. The Xhosa were fleeing from the Zulus who murdered them en masse. Even until today the word or name “Xhosa” in Zulu is synonymous with the word “coward”.
The animosity between the Xhosas and the Zulus goes back hundreds of years. Mandela and Mbeki, the two previous presidents were both Xhosas, but the current president, Jacob Zuma is a Zulu. Zulus and Xhosas hate each other more than they hate whites and that says a lot.
But why do the other Blacks of South Africa hate the Zulus? It goes back to “King” Shaka. Note I put “King” in inverted commas. Blacks can never be kings of any kind…before one can be a King, one should first be a MAN.
Shaka was a sadistic psychopath who committed genocide on a larger scale than Rwanda has ever seen. The Zulus wiped out entire tribes, entire cultures in what is today known as the Mfecane or Dfecane (Annihilation). Shaka’s terror was so great that Mzilikazi, the chief of the Matabeles fled BACK NORTH…direction where Zimbabwe is today.
Amongst all this chaos arrived the White man in the region of the Xhosas. They fought nine “Wars” against the Xhosa between 1811 and 1879. The Frontier Wars, Kaffir wars or Xhosa war
Everytime the wars were about Xhosas stealing cattle and other livestock, burning down homesteads, killing not only white farmer families in the most horrific torturing ways, but also the coloureds who worked for the whites.
It was at the time of the sixth Kaffir war that Piet Retief decided to trek with the other Voortrekkers.
Piet Retief and his party thought they could negotiate and buy land from the Zulus, but they were massacred on a hill at the kraal of the Zulu King, Dingaan when they respected the wishes of Dingaan to leave their weapons outside.
Every man and boy, around 100 in total, were clubbed to death. Retief was the last to be killed, so as to witness the death of his comrades.
Dingaan then ordered all Voortrekker laagers to be attacked along the Bushman’s River. An orgy of violence started. Families were camped at Bloukrans, Dorinkop, Moordspruit, etc. Cowardly blacks would attack them during the middle of the night, killing everyone in the most horrific ways. Women were brutally gang raped and pregnant women were cut open, their babies killed in front of them while they still lived. Small children and babies were picked up by their feet and their heads smashed against the sides of the wagons.
Among the Voortrekkers , 41 men, 56 women and 185 children were killed. In addition another 250 or 252 Khoikhoi and Basuto that accompanied the Voortrekkers were killed. A girl called Johanna van der Merwe (12 years old at the time) sustained 21 assegai wounds, but managed to survive.
The Voortrekkers built the town Weenen (meaning wailing) at the site.
The Bloukrans Massacre
Throughout the following decades up until the present day the whites of South have experienced this petty envy and brutality at the hands of blacks. Examples are legion. Boers retaliated atMakapansgat where blacks savagely murdered whites in the most horrific ways. Hermanus Potgeter was tied down to a rock bed and skinned alive like an animal while still conscious, he died while the blacks ripped his organs out.
More lately we saw the brutal black on black murders with the necklace method . We saw blacks storming into white churches with AK 47’s and hand grenades, opening fire on the unarmed congregation such as at the St James Church massacre. We have seen everything from brutalMuti murders to the evil torture preceding the brutal killings of White farmers and their family members in Rhodesia, Namibia and also in South Africa, most of the time nothing stolen. More than 3000 White farmers and family members murdered to date since the ANC took over in 1994.
It is necessary to reiterate that this violent nature of blacks are not directed at whites only, so the black behaviour apologetics who claim that this behaviour is retribution for wrongs committed by whites against blacks, have no leg to stand on, because most often than not this black violent nature is directed at their own kind as we have seen with Shaka’s defecane, Muti murders and necklacing.
No, this brutality, this murderous, stealing and other asocial behaviour of Blacks could never and can never be reconciled with the behaviour of the deeply religious and pious Boers of South Africa.
This violent behaviour of blacks was one of the rationales for Apartheid. The other was cultural differences. More on that in the next edition. For now it is important to realise that whites in South Africa never wanted to rule blacks. Whites wanted to separate from blacks and stay as far away from blacks as possible.
No.
The entire world is not silent.
Russia is offering free (premium) land to SA farmers, for free to boot.
The civilized nations remain silent because to speak the truth would cause enormous racial strife in their own home countries including the US.
3 Likes
I guess if it boils down to staying & risking you & your family being slaughtered by primitives; Russia’s offer is well worth it. So sad to see South Africa creeping back to the Stone Age. Beautiful farms floundering & going to waste. Farms that will never recover.
1 Like
The Boers (Dutch-speaking Afrikaners) are a stubborn people. They fought the British and established their position through hard work.
But there’s no hope in SA. It’s time for them to leave.
Shame on Holland for not doing enough to save their relatives.
The media and the left would go nuts if it were blacks being slaughtered by whites . It simply shows how hypocritical the left is and always will be .
1 Like
They will not be leaving. Africa is in their blood and they’d rather bleed than give it back.
1 Like
South African farmers in Russia.
I didn’t know that cold climate is beneficial for agriculture.
Russia welcomes South-African white farmers
This video overlaps somewhat but contains different info
U.S. press coverage was always one sided in their support for Mandela and the ANC despite its Communist ties. They were the Savior for black South Africans according to the Liberal press.
Unfortunately there is little unified opposition to the ANC to make a difference.
Russia has been among the worlds leading grain producing countries for a hundred years.
So? What’s your point?
It’s the Bolsheviks (in particular Stalin) who caused mass starvation in Ukraine and elsewhere.
Russia knows what true genocide means.
I think China would have something to say about that, as they killed more people than all those countries combined!
Some estimate Mao killed up to 100 million innocent Chinese.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said Bolsheviks killed 66 million Christians in the Soviet Union. This does not include Soviet soldiers sent to certain deaths while surrendering to Germans was punishable by death (firing squad).
The difference? The Chinese are not allowed to talk about it.
South Africa has no future because it was given to thugs with no ability themselves.
You got your figures wrong, no surprise there! Try 300+ million!
Oh good gawd the mighty. Humanity has a violent nature…period. Why do you think the pasty white British conquered and exploited nearly the whole of the earth, or the pasty white Germans attempted the same.
with the backing of the Bank of England
Their attempt was somewhat different than that of the British because the Nazis wanted the return of “super humans”
1 Like
My point is that you are clueless.
I didn’t know that cold climate is beneficial for agriculture.
Lots of crops prefer a cooler climate, grains like wheat, oats, and barley do particularly well in them.
Yet since WWII both countries have been among the most pacifist on the planet.
How’s Africa done during the same period?
So, what’s your point other than calling other people names?
Worse than America’s silence is the deliberate ignorance of the Dutch government.
The Boers speak (more or less) the same language as Dutch and their ancestors migrated from Holland to South Africa which was not inhabited by blacks then. (Speakers of Zulu languages do not share the same ancestry with “blacks” in the Americas.)
No more Holland by the way as of 2020.
Goes to show the Dutch want to cut be cut off from the past and ignore history