The End Game is Here šŸŽÆ šŸŽ±

1 Like

This cartoon is 80 years old and its still relevant today!

2 Likes

It got worse.
Education / sciences, healthcare / medicine and arts are now in the pay of the banksters, resulting in the brainwashing of the young, climate hoax, AMA (American Murder Association or the Rockefeller medical monopoly in America) and liberal, pornographic arts.

Dandelion may detox the spike protein but I donā€™t know about other ingredients.

Of course its gotten worse! As if we we are seeing today is not proof enough of the degeneracy all around us?

1 Like

The sad realities in the US put the entire world at risk.
Is Putin at fault?
Not really.

Mike Adams
https://ce-publiclw.naturalnews.com/ct.asp?id=0AA4B4F21B414F0EAAC62552EC01B830D6BEAFD7C8849E589DB4EE7DB8B23D57899BA43956D83B87680729844C6D5A58DABA90437D1FDC01B8F22FA40571C215&ct=4aeUsysAAABCWmgzMUFZJlNZAeOFXAAACRmAAAGAEDrn3IAgADFMmJkGRhU9TYQPVPU9qEKKdORdHJkPLNNWxOFKRFDJi7P6bDou5IpwoSADxwq4

1 Like

This is an interesting essay that a friend sent me titled: ā€œThe Last Exit.ā€

ā€œThe Last Exitā€

What causes revolutions? When does the violence start? To find the answer, study one group: Dissatisfied, angry young men. Nearly every revolution in human history was started by this cohort, and if you want to know how likely you are to have a revolution, ignore everything else and study the angry young men in your society. Why are they angry? How many of them are there? Do they communicate regularly? Do they have weapons? Are there political movements that address their grievances and defuse their anger, or are they mocked and shamed and at the point of boiling? Do they have a stake in society, and do they have incentives to maintain stability and keep things as they are or are they wholly disincentivized? These are the questions you have to ask to know if landlords are about to get dragged out of their houses and shot. These are the questions you have to ask if you want to know if aristocrats, celebrities, academics, journalists, and politicians are about to be beaten, killed, and paraded through the streets. These are the questions you have to ask if you want to know when the next genocide is going to occur. Itā€™s happened hundreds of times, dozens in the 20th century alone, and it could be about to happen again, in the USA. We are coming up on the final chance for a political solution to the USAā€™s problems before we could enter a full-blown, violent revolution. We have had multiple missed exits to political solutions to violence, which I will describe below.

Missed Exit 1: the 99% and Occupy Wall Street The first missed exit was in 2008-10, in the form of Occupy Wall Street. Young millennials protested the banking system and their exclusion from the normal avenues of building wealth and buying property. The OWS protesters didnā€™t want handouts. They werenā€™t calling for UBI or more welfare. They didnā€™t want Latin American Venezosocialism. They simply wanted wages commensurate to the value of their labor, and a chance to buy and own a share of America: A slice of American land and a stake in American businesses. Millennials were the first American generation in living memory to have little hope whatsoever to own land and build wealth, and they knew it, and they protested. They wanted dignity. They wanted those responsible for the financial collapse to be held accountable. Instead, the banks got bailed out, the already broke 99% were saddled with the bill, and one of the largest wealth transfers from the middle class to the hyperwealthy took place. OWS was not identitarian: It cut across lines of race, gender, etc., and it dissolved along these lines, as identity politics emerged to dismantle the movement. Current Progressivism, social justice, restorative justice, and white guilt were introduced: the 99% died immediately after, and actual class politics have never come back to mainstream discourse here in the US.

Missed Exit 2: [metoo] he next large left-wing movement was borne from GamerGate. Angry, dissatisfied young men of the millennial and zoomer generation, sick of being perpetually demonized as the villains of identity politics in their heretofore male spheres of gaming, as well as mainstream culture and (for zoomers) in classrooms and colleges started voicing their anger. was the elite response, a broadside of thinly veiled managerial supremacism under the guise of feminism. was exclusively bourgeois, exclusively moneyed, and incredibly politically influential. From 2015-2018,accelerated the reconfiguration of American politics, journalism, media, culture, and the overton window of mainstream discourse. Identity politics was no longer just an obscure instrument to destroy class solidarity in OWS: It was now the official civil religion of the USA, a replacement for Christianity. No aspect of addressed any kind of material inequality, wealth inequality, property ownership, land ownership, or other traditional popular concerns. Around this time, the word ā€˜populistā€™ became a pejorative: a perfect summation of the total capture of leftwing politics by wealthy, whitecollar, sanctimonious, and overwhelmingly female managers.

was exclusively concerned with superstructural minutiae, tone-policing, editorial decisions of fantasy novels, micro-aggressions, and policing the grey zones of human sexuality. Perhaps because of its astonishing vacuity and pettiness, it didnā€™t last long. Leftwing politics soon pivoted to [#BLM] Proof that is entirely dead can be found everywhere: The ā€˜Karenā€™ meme is clearly a sexist disparagement of women, and is totally acceptable dinnertable conversation. Jeffrey Epsteins client list was never revealed and his partern, Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking minors to ā€œNo Oneā€ - because to reveal the truth would have been to reveal the game. There were no protests, and there was no vociferous objection. The ā€œfeministsā€ were silent, partly because they had nothing to say about the material world. Biden sexually harassed Tara Reade and had inappropriate sexual showers with his daughter, and his son is a known John who bought foreign prostitutes, slept with his dead brothers sister, and had a laptop detailing sex with minors: nobody care and was more successful in reducing the breast size of Japanese videogame characters than it was in creating any tangible improvement to the lives of Americans, male or female. And now, like OWS before it, is dead.

Missed Exit 3: BLM is the largest social movement in postwar American history and THE largest ā€œcharity driveā€ in American history - although the billions of dollars raised went to ACT Blue, numerous mansions for its leadership, and interracial trust is at a historic low since the Civil Rights era. If approximated a civil religion, BLM codified its doctrines in Critical Race Theory, complete with foreign missions (European football players kneeling to the new American God), prophets (Robin DiAngelo, Ibram Kendi, etc.), martyr saints (George Floyd, whose image is painted on the walls of every American city) and had a funeral which brought together world leaders who bowed before a golden casket, castes (blacks at the top, whites and Asians at the bottom), and a motivated political party (the Biden administration, the DOJ/FBI, and the Bureaucratic State). BLMā€™s sister doctrine, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion is a tithe that every organization, public and private, pays to the new religion. As with before it, BLM is only nominally leftist, and as with , itā€™s overwhelmingly bourgeois, openly disdainful of the productive classes such as manual laborers, farmers, etc., who it openly mocks and despises. Cultural workers, teachers, and government or corporate bureaucrats are the heroes of BLM: farmers, oil field workers, and bricklayers are its deadly enemies.

BLM has no plan whatsoever for fixing the wealth gap, land ownership, or public stakes in businesses: itā€™s primarily concerned with openly anti-empirical police and educational policies, which dramatically fail every time theyā€™re implemented. Conveniently, BLM is also strictly opposed to objective measurement and accountability, a sensible orientation that may allow it to endure for a year or two more than it would otherwise. Critical Race Theory is fundamentally a faith-based doctrine: facts donā€™t matter, only spiritual virtue, admissions of guilt, and celebrations of the religion itself. Unsurprisingly, the old Atheist intelligentsia that castrated Christianity for young millennials -Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, et al - absolutely loathe CRT. Presumably once people start realizing that defunding the police massively increases rape and murder rates and that abolishing standardized testing doesnā€™t improve black literacy, there will be a backlash, and we are starting to see this in small forms in various cities and locales. From the public perspective, the best aspect of BLM is a typical Latin-American style socialism based on demanding a vastly expanded government bureaucracy to give welfare and handouts to an elect class of professional victims. Even in this regard, it appears to have partially failed: Blacks are no better off than before #BLM, likely due to the extremely corrupt grifters in charge of the treasury of the organization - Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza, and Melina Abdullah. BLM has, however, successfully increased the proportion of white-collar managers and nonproductive workers in every institution, and in this regard is a resounding triumph for the useless managerial elite. Back in 2000, boomers used to joke: ā€œYouā€™ll never get a job with your degree in comparative African lesbian basket weavingā€. The average DEI officer earns $122,000, around four times more than what an average worker earns. Is the joke funny now? Are you laughing? Sex and stable societies: Stable societies have to find a way to pacify young men, for the above mentioned reason that young men are THE only known cause of violent revolutions. If you piss off enough young men, your civilization doesnā€™t survive. Throughout history, countries have found different ways of doing this: empires typically send their young men off to conquer foreign land - this is what the British did, and what the Japanese did after the Rice Riots of the early 20th century. Send the angry young guys to kill foreigners and take some land for themselves. Modern, non-colonial nation states donā€™t usually have this option. They have to calm the guys down another way. One traditional way is marriage. Get the guys married, ideally in a 1:1 ratio, and things calm down a lot. Polygamy typically creates unstable societies: look at the constant strife in the middle east as an example. If 3 guys out of 4 canā€™t get a wife, expect constant violence, suicide bombings, etc. Similarly, noncommittal relationships tend to be associated with very high rates of violence. Look at the West African matriarchal societies, where men donā€™t stay with their pregnant partners, and instead form rotating circus of bandits, rapists, and murderers. These societies never invented the wheel, the plough, the sail, or a written script, and today enjoy the highest rape and murder rates on the planet. This is almost certainly because of the constant havoc caused by angry, unanchored, deracinated, alienated men, few of whom knew their fathers. Tragically, this pattern that has been nearly-identically reproduced in black communities in major US metro areas, see: Baltimore, East St. Louis, Detroit, etc.; communities that BLM is conspicuously silent about, because BLM is a managerial project for increasing the number of white-collar administrators in public and private institutions, NOT a project to improve the lives of black people. Increasingly, young men in the USA donā€™t marry, donā€™t have sex, and donā€™t have girlfriends. Over 40% of zoomer males have never had sexual intercourse. The median age of the cohort is 21. This is historically unprecedented. Women have a calming and pacifying effect on males, even on the biological level; cohabiting with a partner lowers your testosterone and drastically decreases your violent crime rate. But young men in the USA arenā€™t doing that. Settling down with a woman requires resources. It requires a stake in society. It requires a slice of American land. For millennials and zoomers, this is close to impossible. The chance that you marry increases massively if you own property. The chance that you have children increases massively too. The inability of young men to buy property is directly causing their failure to have long-term partners and children. Guys who 40 years ago would have been doing DIY, building a front porch, volunteering at the local church, and helping raise their kids, are today spending their nights ranting about the ā– ā– ā– ā–  on 4Chan or are gaming until 4am ā€“ theyā€™ve given up on a promise that largely doesnā€™t exist anymore. If you are concerned about the possibility of a violent revolution, this development should alarm you. OWS touched on this issue, but the two major ā€œleftistā€ political movements, and, have not even obliquely addressed this problem. In the case of, male success and well-being is probably directly antithetical to the movementā€™s stated objectives (inasmuch as they ever relate to material reality, which is rare). The USA has developed a new solution to pacifying young men that does not depend on marriage, children, love, community, business ownership, or ownership of a little plot of land to call their own. The new solution is drugs, pornography, videogames, junk food, social media, and the now ever popular gender transition. So far, it appears to have worked to sedate the young men. Even the angriest young men are so physically unfit from their sedentary lifestyles and corn-syrup diets that the chances of them forming a cohort of red guards and door-to-door murdering landlords is vanishingly slim. Theyā€™re much more likely to smoke a blunt, eat some fruit loops, watch Rick and Morty, or dress up as their favorite female anime character for other lonely guys online. But how long can this passivity last? Are we kicking the can down the road, or have we finally found a way to permanently stop violent revolutions? Is this what Francis Fukuyama called the ā€˜end of historyā€™? Will Zoomer males, totally iced out of land ownership and business ownership be content with subscription-service everything, spending their lives as perpetual, sexless tenants, receiving government UBI stipends which get funneled instantly into the pockets of a hedge fund megalandlord like BLACKROCK and online pornography purveyors of OnlyFans? Is Ready Player One the perfect image of the immediate future? Are corn syrup, Nintendo, porn, and weed the ultimate technology in preventing Mao Zedong or Adolf Hitler from rising again? Itā€™s very hard to tell, not least because exactly 0 good-faith sociologists are examining what is going on in all-male spaces and male culture. We simply have no idea how close we are to a Bolshevik revolution. It might happen tomorrow. Or, it may never happen again in the West. Hereā€™s an excerpt from an online forum popular with zoomer males: ā€œIā€™m going to own a house by the time Iā€™m 40. If I canā€™t afford it, Iā€™ll fucking take it. Iā€™ll shoot someone and take their fucking house. Iā€™m an American, and Iā€™m going to own a piece of America. My ancestors killed and took land. If I canā€™t buy it legally, Iā€™ll do the fucking same. Fuck Black Rock Capital. Fuck the government. Fuck my faggot kike landlord and his bitch of a wife. Iā€™m not a rentcuck.ā€ How many young men feel the same way? Do they speak to each other? How many more politically peaceful chances do we have to avoid them enacting this fantasy? Do wealthy Americans of the managerial class understand that there are increasingly angry, deracinated, alienated young men with absolutely no incentive to maintain society as it is? The CIA, FBI, and NSA have identified angry young men as the #1 terrorist threat to the USA. But is that really true of a group of emotionally and mentally castrated young men? Unfortunately, the proposed solutions by those at the helm are, inevitably, of the managerial type: we need more censors, more anti-bias training, more government spying, more anti-racist educators, more control over publishing, more scrutiny of social media,more censoring, more shaming of young men, more language policing, more women and people of color in positions of power. None of these solutions make even passing reference to why males are angry. Who cares? Will these solutions work? Many of you may think that Iā€™m exclusively talking about the bete noire of American politics, the dreaded White Male. Soon, that wonā€™t be true. Over 50% of under-18ā€™s in the USA are Hispanic. As of 2021, the median age of Hispanics is 11. In less than a decade, a colossal cohort of young, low-net- worth, low-education young males are going to begin adulthood. Their parents usually married and settled down. The younger generation of Hispanics do not. They donā€™t marry, they donā€™t have kids, they donā€™t own businesses, and they donā€™t own property. Will they be satisfied with a future of perpetual tenancy to non-hispanic landlords, compounded by their humiliating cultural inferiority to the non-hispanic white population? Will they peacefully lay down and accept their fate? The best outcome is a descent into constant low-level violence, as we see in Columbia, Mexico, etc. However, another likely outcome is an actual revolution as young men from this cohort decide to take what they want. If working doesnā€™t get you anywhere, what kind of an imbecile works? Americans tend to think of everything in racial terms, but Iā€™m suspicious. If we look at the groups that those in charge try to pit against each other (whites, blacks, latinos) we can see what this group may look like if they ever came together. Youā€™d have rural whites, urban blacks, and 2nd generation Hispanics setting aside their differences and torching country clubs and breaching the most exclusive gated communities. Little wonder that identity politics is so enthusiastically endorsed by politicians and elites! Theyā€™re absolutely right: At this point in history, actual cross-racial solidarity will almost certainly lead to a violent revolution. If white young men and black young men realize that their enemies are landlords, hedge fund managers, and the politicians who protect them - well, if that happens, I hope youā€™ve stocked up on ammunition, and that you donā€™t have too many frail dependents. I encourage you to take a glance at the Chinese anti-rightist campaign, the Chinese Land Reform movement, or Soviet dekulakization. Check out Pol Potā€™s Year Zero. When young men get angry, get together, and put on armbands, stark changes start to happen to society. If its a concern, please understand that mass-rape has been a component of many revolutions throughout history. If this is your concern, please understand that racial genocides have also been a component of many revolutions, with few exceptions. I would encourage the intellectual and managerial elite to stop trying to find innovative ways to be remunerated for non-productive labor, stop focusing on virtue and culture, and instead start worrying about material reality. Worry about property ownership, about who owns this country, and about what is going to happen if we donā€™t get back to a place where owning a little bit of land and a home to raise a family in is possible. Iā€™m not a cynic or an empty critic. I have suggestions. I believe that politicians must address the following: - Facilitate a course that restores the basic premise of residential property ownership by US citizens. Every American should be able to own a piece of America. - Inhibit mega-landlords and absentee landlords (Blackrock, StateStreet, Vanguard, etc). Landlors have been the direct, proximate cause of several revolutions in human history. - Inhibit hedge funds and banks from speculating in residential property and buying up entire neighborhoods for SFRā€™s or buying properties 20-30% over appraisal which prevents everyday buyers from participating in home ownership and wealth building. Inhibit foreigners from purchasing US land; ideally forbid it entirely. There is no reason China or any other nation for that matter should own land around US military installations, major sections of our domestic food production facilities, or our infrastructure. The Aristocracy must engage in good-faith conversations about immigration that are not centered on racism. Increasing the supply of labor decreases wages. Increasing the supply of tenants increases rents and house prices. Foreigners are less likely to unionize. These are cogent, left-wing concerns, and smearing all discussion about immigration as racist is not productive. And we MUST discourage identity politics. Poor blacks and poor whites have more in common than poor whites have with rich whites. Ditto women and men. Class politics and real issues have to be endorsed again. We must avoid and disassemble the welfare-bureaucracy-handout/ UBI style socialism that has taken root in this nation. Its a safety net for hard times. Not the base upon which entire communities and cultures should be built on. This is the Latin American model, and itā€™s historically disastrous. Cuba, Venezuela, Columbia, etc. have experimented with it, and it always fails. Politics should focus on the wealth gap and ownership. The general public should own their own home, have a stake in their business, and have a stake in their community. A nation of government-dependent tenants WILL be violently unstable. History proves this. - Stop shaming the poor and everyday folks as ā€˜hillbilliesā€™, ā€˜hicksā€™, ā€˜rednecksā€™, ā€˜flyover countryā€™, etc. The Aristocracy and those who vote alongside them MUST stand up for the everyday worker. The elite, hypereducated capture of the left is utterly, disastrously toxic. There is no reason a guy working construction should be paying taxes which pay for some Ivy League students worthless English degree. It prevents us from solving the problems that threaten social stability. We must encourage real-life social institutions. The abandonment and disenfranchisement from society is disastrous. Humans need social community in the physical realm. Respecting young men may be difficult, but if society continues this trend it will, likely within a generation or two learn to fear them. Understand that collectively men do, to a real extent, hold a gun to the head of civilization. It is young men who decide if we have a Great Leap Forward or a Dekulakization or a Kristallnacht. Ideally, society should be encouraging young men to have a settled stake in society by offering them prestige and respect for doing the right thing. At the very least, the aristocracy and managerial class that appear so blind must begin to appreciate the fact that every civilization is in a hostage situation, and it is ultimately the young men who decide if we have revolutions and genocide or if we have white-picket fences and golden retrievers. You may not like it, you may hate it, but you must understand it. Be Kind To Your Neighbors.

2 Likes

Like the colonel is implying (never saying explicitly), those people who own the banks and mass media are responsible for the madness in the west.
And we know who they are.

1 Like

It will be ideal if the host speaks English without any accent.
Nonetheless, her English is very good, if not perfect.

She is the person from whom I heard first that Ukrainian grains are toxic and that pet foods made from animals thus died are killing cats and dogs in Poland.

September 2015

ā€œThis is not about Fucking Republican or Fucking Democrats! Itā€™s about the FACT that this is the first Fucking President in Fucking History who praises the rest of the Fucking corrupt World and Shits on his own Country! Itā€™s just who he is as a person. An angry ungrateful community Organizer! Remember his Fucking wife? Only when she realized a Miracle had happened, she became Proud of her Country!ļ»æā€

Fk these Pā€™s-O-S! If it were up to me, I would go old testament style on these scumbags and ask questions later. Sometimes death is deserving, but God did say: ā€œvengeance is mineā€ but its so hard to be meek when helplessly watching these treasonous scumbags destroy my country.

It has been their modus operandi for thousands of years.
They have always been successful because the goyim have a short memory span.

No doubt! When you destroy any commonality that a people of a nation may share, then you pretty much destroy everything else along with it and do so without feeling remorse for its consequence.

2 Likes

He should have broken this up into smaller sub units. This is one long scribe.

1 Like

In the meanwhile, the Dems are busy destroying the USA

2 Likes

Yeah perhaps. I am too tired to look at it now.

I donā€™t listen to Mike Adams nowadays because heā€™s full of doom and gloom.
But this video gives you some hope that the globalists are failing.

1 Like

I served with Mike, he always had a view that seemed all doom and gloom but that is not his intent.

The Great Reset is the aim of most globalists.