The Aviation Enthusiasts Thread

I welcome the technology and the idea of having such vehicles available. With sufficient control reliability and electronic navigation systems they could be quite useful as commercially operated for-hire transportation using licensed pilots just as we do today with private fixed wing planes and helicopters.

But to make them easily available to untrained operators or pilot-free automated craft would present problems.

  • failure may result in craft striking occupied property located on the ground
  • kidnapping would become a breeze
  • there are no parking places in the sky
  • mid-air electrical failure turns the flying craft into a rock with no gliding or autorotation remedies. (perhaps they all need to have automatic parachutes…but that increases the weight)

Don’t we have Skyhooks? Where did Sky Hooks come from?

I’m having a Mandela Effect moment.

1 Like

https://youtu.be/BvYm9Fm6vKw

https://youtu.be/ZGQt-6avFjg

Before the SR 71 was the Lockheed A 12. They resemble each other, but the later was lighter, faster and flew higher. Used in Vietnam for strategic reconnaissance it had one close call with a SAM missal. Its true capabilities and missions are still secret. Great tutorial.

That’s what you get when you first design a gun and then build a flying tank around it.

1 Like
1 Like

Another great concept aircraft that never went into production.

The Good News is there’s still ongoiing work on upgrading the remaining F-15’s and 16’s instead of shelving them all to be replaced with the much more expensive F-22’s and 35’s.

In any serious conflict we need the best stealth tech we can for covert and first strike capability but those platforms could still play a vital role in the air dominance equation for decades to come with a few upgrades.

1 Like

Here is an example of a failed project.

Can this be considered part of aviation?

I wouldn’t really call it a failure. It proved to be a very good aircraft and performed very well.

Like a whole lot of other aircraft though it simply came along too late in the war to play a major part in the war.

A study in ground effects flight.

Ok thanks for that clarification as this seems to be a grey area when I posted that.

https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Ground_Effect

Definition

Ground Effect is the name given to the positive influence on the lifting characteristics of the horizontal surfaces of an aircraft wing when it is close to the ground. This effect is a consequence of the distortion of the airflow below such surfaces attributable to the proximity of the ground. It applies to both fixed and rotary wing aircraft.

image

This is a weird plane and never knew that this actually existed.

Yessir.

Various jet and rocket packs have been in development for more than 70 years.

The problem is fuel/power/lifting capacity. We tested some military personal lifting prototypes in the eighties/early nineties but kept running up against the same problems plaguing development back into the forties and fifties.

These new electric/electronic micro turbofans may finally “Get it done”.

Of course the Russians tried to do it “Bigger and Better” than anyone else.

Fortunately they were never able to solve the associated problems with either sand in deserts or high seas.

There were a boat load of really strange concept aircraft that came out of the war, most of which never went into production.

Desperation and big money will do that.

Very interesting tutorial about the development of the first American Jet Bomber.