Stupid Scientist

I am not a fan of scientist. Scientists, when they get it wrong, can cause catastrophic damage. And here is one of the most shining examples of this: When asked the question “what is a human being?”, the scientists reply “if a creature can make and use tools that makes him a human.” Bull! What about the animals that knifed the girl to death here lately, they didn’t make the knives, but they sure knew how to use them. What scientists are doing wrong when trying to determine what a human is, is that they are starting at the bottom, not at the top. What about honor, integrity, love, morality, love thy neighbor as thy self, fairness, self-esteem, etc., etc., shouldn’t these be first considered when determining what a human is? Instead of that, we have these low-life forms being called human beings when they are nothing but vicious animals, murdering innocent people for fun and profit. For America, the end is coming.

Modern society is to blame for there being so many people who don’t deserve to live. Most people in the West used to harden as they grow on their own, like anywhere else. Now without effort you can remain indefinitely infantile due to our decadence. There were always outliers that became like this throughout history, but now the general masses have succumbed to this condition. There is no longer a rite of passage into adulthood, you can be sheltered and live comfortably. This is de-evolution. Everyone has a dandy-ol time being a degenerate well into their 50s. Constant entertainment, pre-cooked meals and pornography have robbed us of our man-hood.

Realize that to live is to struggle. Really internalize this truth in your being and actions and when possible spread it to others that you care about. In the end the Natural Order will always prevail. Nature is inherently fascist. The modern world is a world that goes completely against nature and the results are telling. It’s tearing itself apart. Nevertheless, you, as an individual, can always choose to go against the flow and struggle and persevere while the rest of society rots and withers away. It’s not an easy path, but you go on because you know that you are in the right and that in the end you will be vindicated.

The modern world is so self-destructive, half the battle is just weathering the storm until the whole edifice has degenerated so much that we can rise and deal the final blow. Live to live your life correctly and that will bring happiness to yourself and those around you.

It’s time to clean your house.

What will we do? Will we save human civilization? Will we overturn these “laws,” destroy these broken, infiltrated, and treasonous institutions, and rebuild our nations–truly nations now, with only one people in them–as they used to be? Will we execute the traitors? Will we make political decisions based on fact, reason, and true scientific proof, rather than force “science” to mean what suits our emotional whims or political expediency? Will we reclaim the Family–enshrine the man and the woman in their rightful places as husband and wife, together, unbreakable, against the world–and raise our children as they should be raised? Will we restore our culture and morality–either by returning the West to true, pre-Scofield Christianity, by making objective truth the foundation of our worldview in other forms, or both–and rid ourselves of the psychological disease that is solipsistic subjectivist individuality? Will we stop destroying our bodies and minds to feed transient pleasures? Will we stop sacrificing our long-term well-being to get quick personal gain at the expense of our family, friends, neighbors, communities, and nations? Will we rebuild our neighborhoods–and through them our cities, states, and nations–as true communities of ideologically similar individuals who understand how to work and sacrifice for one another such that we all succeed together? Will we stop being led around by false flags and propaganda campaigns, fighting other nations’ wars for them? Will we relearn how and why land annexations happened and the true good they brought to the world through the spread of civilization? Will we relearn how to wage war successfully, by understanding who and what our true enemies–physical and ideological–really are, and thereby learn how to engage and defeat them for all time?

After so many years, will we still be alive? Do you want to live? Do you want to die? Will you stand and fight?

Or will you lie down and die like a dog?

I cannot function without booze but with just enough to get me a little tipsy. I am able to talk with my peers with mindless bread and circuses that I would hate if I were sober such as sports or workplace drama. Why do I have to hide the fact I don’t like any of those things? Why do people push me away when I talk about things I am interested in? I want someone to talk to outside instead of here but I can’t hide who I am any longer.

1 Like

1 Like

After our daughter of fifteen years of age was moved to tears by the speech of Greta Thunberg at the UN, she became angry with our generation “who had been doing nothing for thirty years.”

So, we decided to help her prevent what the girl on TV announced of “massive eradication and the disappearance of entire ecosystems.”

We are now committed to give our daughter a future again, by doing our part to help cool the planet four degrees.

From now on she will go to school on a bicycle, because driving her by car costs fuel, and fuel puts emissions into the atmosphere. Of course it will be winter soon and then she will want to go by bus, but cycling through the freezing builds resilience.

Of course, she is now asking for an electric bicycle, but we have shown her the devastation caused to the areas of the planet as a result of mining for the extraction of Lithium and other minerals used to make batteries for electric bicycles, so she will be pedaling, or walking.

Which will not harm her, or the planet. We used to cycle and walk to school too.

Since the girl on TV demanded “we need to get rid of our dependency on fossil fuels” and our daughter agreed with her, we have disconnected the heat vent in her room. The temperature is now dropping to twelve degrees in the evening, and will drop below freezing in the winter, we have promised to buy her an extra sweater, hat, tights, gloves and a blanket.

For the same reason we have decided that from now on she only takes a cold shower. She will wash her clothes by hand, with a wooden washboard, because the washing machine is simply a power consumer and since the dryer uses natural gas, she will hang her clothes on the clothes line to dry, just like my parents and grandparents used to do.

Speaking of clothes, the ones that she currently has are all synthetic, so made from petroleum. Therefore on Monday, we will bring all her designer clothing to the secondhand shop.

We have found an eco store where the only clothing they sell is made from undyed and unbleached linen and jute. Also can’t have clothes made on wool, because the emissions from farting sheep are supposedly causing bad weather.

It shouldn’t matter that it looks good on her, or that she is going to be laughed at, dressing in colorless, bland clothes and without a wireless bra, but that is the price she has to pay for the benefit of The Climate.

From now on, at 7 p.m. we will turn off the WiFi and we will only switch it on again the next day after dinner for two hours. In this way we will save on electricity, so she is not bothered by electro-stress and will be totally isolated from the outside world. This way, she can concentrate solely on her homework. At eleven o’clock in the evening we will pull the breaker to shut the power off to her room, so she knows that dark is really dark. That will save a lot of CO2.

1 Like

Instead of Obamacare or another communist, socialized system of medicine, or government run replacement takeover of healthcare, which is designed to run the countries that implement them into the ground, why not privatize the doctors, nurses, and hospitals?

By privatize, I mean remove the gov’t restrictions and regulations imposed on the medical industry, designed to monopolize the education, treatment courses and subsequent careers of the docs/nurses/staff and allow the ‘market’ to decide what works best to cure and maintain health. There would be far less prescription meds, and far more of an emphasis on nutrition, because, for example, over 900 chronic diseases are caused by malnutrition, but docs will get you spending $$ on pills every month to mask symptoms rather than curing with diet changes. Eating sugar, high fructose corn syrup, causes problems, etc. etc., but we are not informed by doctors because rea$on$.

Moreover, if the huge parasitic middle men that are known as health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies, were NOT given a monopoly, and privatized hospitals were allowed to sell their own insurance, and allowed to prescribe without coercion, it would free up billions that would go directly to healthcare, rather than pure profit for insurance/pill companies AND the paperwork/regulation overhead that they impose.

There is already more than enough case law and precedent to protect people from malicious docs. The amount of money people would pay in insurance (to their local hospitals) would probably be HALF of what they pay now, and some sort of system, -docs and hospitals would come up with-, to distribute money to help the poor, fund research, and specialized institutions like the Mayo clinic could easily be set up.

We don’t need government, or vestigial insurance companies with their actuarial tables and skyscrapers in every city getting in the way to provide health care, so why do we allow them to force that on us? Why let the communists make it even worse and impose another massive government bureaucracy along side the educational, insurance, and pharmaceutical ones already proven to be wasteful, ineffectual, and many times downright harmful?

Don’t replace Obamacare, get rid of it, and get out of the way.

The government rules with the consent of the governed. When the government gets out of control you have a constitutional right and a duty to bring it back under control. As I travel across the United States I eat at the local restaurants. I read the local newspapers and listen to the locals talk. Many of these communities are having problems with their governments so much so I estimate 1 percent of the nations sheriffs have been recalled in an election or arrested while in office. These communities think they are doing something that has never been done before and are terrified of retaliation. What I propose is communities start sharing information on how to bring the government back under control. There will eventually be a national magazine and website called the consent of the governed. I’m going to get you started here. If a government is involved in civil asset forfeiture you must make sure they don’t profit from it. Hit them with fines. I suggest you start with the ADA. These are best done when a disabled veteran reports them. ADA fines can be $100000.00 each and local governments can’t push around the ADA.

If we had just left them swinging through the trees and sacrificing each other wholesale to their various gods, instead of trying to get them to wear clothes and learn English or Spanish or French and wash their hands after going to the bathroom, they still would be happily making mud pies with their own filth and dying like flies, and their population density still would be what it was ten thousand years ago; the tropical rain forests still would be thriving, and the lions still would be eating as many of them as vice versa. Most important, we wouldn’t be carrying them on our backs now whenever we go to a hospital; we wouldn’t be subjecting our kids to them in our schools; we wouldn’t have them shoved in our faces whenever we turn on a television receiver; we wouldn’t be looking for parts of the country to which we can flee where there are fewer of them; we wouldn’t be watching our whole civilization being pulled back down into barbarism by their dead weight. We could be masters in our own world, a cleaner and greener and healthier world.

All of that is wonderful, but it is not wonderful that so many of us who are able to feel the pain of others do not seem to have the farsighted understanding which should go along with that empathy. We seem to have achieved that understanding when it comes to things such as forest and wildlife management. We understand that it often is good to permit Nature to take its course in the case of forest fires, or in maintaining the natural balance between predator and prey, and so on. But we need to apply the same considerations to the non-White races. We never should have permitted medical intervention in the non-White world. We should not be trying now to halt the spread of AIDS in Africa. We should not even consider famine relief for Ethiopia. We should not interfere in the mutual genocide between Hutus and Tutsis. Unless we temper our altruism with intelligence - and especially, unless we limit it to our own race - it will destroy us rather than help us achieve a higher civilization and a higher grade of humanity on this planet.

What rules us now is a soft-headed, mushy, egalitarian, feminine sort of altruism, where we are more inclined to feed the starving picaninnies of Africa than to take account of the fact that every picaninny who doesn’t starve to death now will grow up to breed more picaninnies. We feel sorry for the disease-ridden Blacks and Browns of the world, and instead of keeping them and their diseases strictly confined to their part of the world, we bring them into our part of the world so that we can share their diseases - as in the case of New York’s current outbreak of West Nile encephalitis imported from Africa.

What we need is a hard-headed, masculine sort of altruism, which makes us as concerned for the preservation of our own racial quality as for the stamping out of the fur trade, the sort of altruism which leads us to sterilize our own defectives rather than permitting them to breed a White welfare class, just as it leads us to thin out the two-legged population of Africa rather than permitting it to continue encroaching on the four-legged populations.

I have studied hard about the collapse of the bronze age. I find it amazing how a number of factors led entire civilizations to disappear (Mycenaean and Hittite) and others to remain crippled for a few years now (Egyptians and Assyrians). One of the explanations of what was most interesting was Joseph Tainter’s theory, which in society has become complex to solve problems, and applies more problems to solve, becomes more complex to the extent that the costs to maintain too large (such as Roman Empire). It’s more complex than that of course, but too lazy to talk more. I recommend watching this short series (short, 5 videos between 7 and 20 min)

Now that the context is gone, do you think our society will collapse soon? Given economic complexity, these social crises and the current generation of snow? How do you think we could prepare for any collapse of society in this model?

This beanie boy faggot is the stupidest bag of dicks I’ve ever seen. He claims he’s a lefty, yet he does nothing but pump Trump on his channel 24/7. When I’m feeling demoralized and it seems like conservatives are just taking one black eye after another, when I need that pick-me-up to help me keep my head high during these dark, woke times, why is it that I go to Pool’s channel to feel good about how everything is going on my side of the political aisle? He puffs the conservative peter about how great the economy is doing under Trump… yet constantly says “I’m not gonna vote for him. I’ll vote green party.” Holy shit what an asshat. Even though I like his videos, I am considering unsubbing from his channel because I am getting sick of his shit. That and his stupid fucking all-black attire and stupid beanie are making me want to punch small animals very hard. I bet that beanie stinks.

1 Like

I feel ya! Why should you anyway?

BS - bullshit; MS - more shit; PhD - piled high & deep. Of course if I said this applies to all members of the scientific community, I’d be lying; but there are the chosen few.

1 Like

I’m not even understanding what’s going on in this thread. Can someone please explain to me what all of this is supposed to mean?

A big problem is, many ( not all ), but many scientists will pad their research. That never pays off.

@David

Science is a religion.