Saturday Morning Cinema: 100 Best Films of All Time (The Film Enthusiasts Thread) šŸ“½

Not much into horror as a genre so I probably wonā€™t watch it. However, one of the best cult classics in the that genre is ā€œAmerican Werewolf in Londonā€ which has a different type of intensity that lends to the story line and cinematic quality. Zombies and gore is pretty much over done to the point its become a cliche. No thank you, that stuff I find boring.

I thought exactly the same way.I only went to the show because I was bored: I have never regretted watching that movie, it has been one of the funniest movies I have ever seen. A few years later, I watched the sequel, very disappointing! Try to find the dubbed English version.

One of my very favorite movies of all timeā€”It has to be tied with at least 5 other movies as my third favorite Movieā€”is once again showing on Turner Classic Movies.

It is also IMO the number one pathetic failure of the Academy Awards history, not to give Natalie Wood the best actress Oscar. Itā€™s shameful!. All the other nominees were very good, BUT Natalie Wood, who was probably playing herself more then ā€œacting,ā€ (and not considered the greatest dramatic actress) takes the prize IMO of the greatest performance of all timeā€“of whether actor or actress. The movie is mind-blowing every time I watch it. (seen it a hundred times)

Here is the list of 1963 Nominees

WINNER

SOPHIA LOREN

Two Women
ā€¦

1963 NOMINEES

AUDREY HEPBURN

Breakfast at Tiffanyā€™s,

PIPER LAURIE

The Hustler,

GERALDINE PAGE

Summer and Smoke,

NATALIE WOOD

Splendor in the Grass,

The Screenwriter Playwright, William Inge also wrote another top movie in my list, ā€œPicnicā€

1 Like

George Orwellā€™s ā€œ1984

Complete (1:47:30)
December 1954 BBC Sunday-Night Theatre
Peter Cushing, AndrƩ Morell, Yvonne Mitchell, Donald Pleasence

1 Like

That movie was GREAT!

Seen that a number of times. I prefer the Edmond Obrien one. Here is a colorized version

Best version IMOā€¦ I saw this so many times that year

Itā€™s a masterpiece.

I like the b@w but I also like the colorized

https://youtu.be/O_m-BVu3m5o

1 Like

I actually like the version with John Hurt the best. However, the many versions of it have their own artistic appeal.

Honestly I am so imprinted by this Edmund Obrien Version, seeing it so young, so many times. It was a revelation. I am imprinted by it and although Iā€™ve tried to watch the later version, I just canā€™t watch it. This one is just too incredible and captures the brutal surrealism, gut-wrenching punch of the of the book.

1 Like

The book was better though.

The book is of course phenomenal. I read it very young. I have vivid memories of it. The movie played on ā€œMillion Dollar Movieā€ in NY on Channel 9, every night for a week, and 6 months later for another week, in about '57 or '58. The Room 101 was incredible.

The Movie ā€œFalling Downā€ has become sort of a cult classic favorite.

1 Like

Great film in the documentary genre. Also very eye opening when it comes to insulated power and Central Banks

Directed by Michael Oswald

1 Like

https://youtu.be/O9fWLRe7QUg

I was wondering if you finished the ā€œLeftoversā€ and what your thoughts were.

I am rewatching it again and just finished Season 1. I picked up on some things that I missed the first go around.

Yes I saw the whole thing in like 3 days when you mentioned it. Iā€™m sure I commented on it.

It kept my interest. It reminded me of a couple of Stephen King series, especially the Dome series, or the Standā€¦i.e., ensemble characters ā€¦ bizarre, events, Like those, the writing feels arbitrary at times, with TV production values. It felt like a story that been done numerous times and it was a reboot. I wasnā€™t bored though.

What specifically are you referring to? As what previous story lines are similar?

Did you see the Dome series or the Stand? Or read the Stand?

The religious ideation is forced and a bit kooky. I ended up liking the ending although convoluted.

There was another one it reminded me of but I donā€™t remember the name. The ending had felt tacked onā€¦like this one.

Jumping around in timeā€¦and end up with Wyatt Earp or someone cheating death. Some shows evoke similar feelings. A Twilight Zone formula.

There was a Good Sci-Fi ā€œLuciferā€™s Hammerā€ Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle. Ensemble Cast, similar feelingsā€¦Also did you read ā€œInfernoā€ by them? A sci-fi Danteā€™s Inferno. Both of those were entertaining stories.

image

image

Something about similar writer strategies writing ensemble,stories about apocalyptic-relligiosoā€¦

Also did you ever get to see ā€œThe Rapture?ā€

Look like Larry Nivenā€™s huge ā€œRingworldā€ Series is being put together by the Games of Thrones people with MGM and Amazon.

Itā€™s about time. Itā€™s about time Hollywood goes back to the REAL writers and stop playing Sci-fi writers.

Nada to all, meaning I didnā€™t read ā€œThe Standā€ or see the movie. In fact none of these I have seen before. Maybe you were prejudiced and comparing. The reason I say that, last night I watched Troy for about the 20th time! (Snicker) anyway, I read the Robert Graves complete Greek Mythology collection (which BTW is the best) and was disappointed with some of the inaccuracies in the story. Such as Thetas and how Ajax died. My point is, would I be as disappointed not knowing the stories before seeing the movie?

Getting back to ā€œThe Leftoversā€ I found some really compelling moments in the first season. Like my favourite the dog coming back and Noraā€™s moment with the baby. Or when Kevin was confessing to Father Matt in the diner.

Lastly and I didnā€™t make the connection with Patty the first time I watched it, but it was her who orchestrated the stoning of her colleague and the reason she wanted to die was because the guilt was too much to bear. Hence the name ā€œGuilty Remnantā€ was an interesting irony, at least for me it was.

1 Like

I think the writers and producers have the limitation of not knowing if their show will have a Season 2,3,4 etc. And they have to start making it up as they go along. They start with a interesting idea, like ā€œLostā€ and donā€™t know where they want it to go and it starts getting convoluted. and episodic. Like ā€œLostā€.

I watched very little of Lost.

I remember Season 1 of The Leftovers was too sadistic.

Shows written by a committee of writers and have different directors most episodes sometime annoys me for that reason

Its not that I was comparing The Leftover with anything as I was watching it. Iā€™m sensitive to ā€œOld Hatā€ stories and Hollywood stealing from writers especially the greatest genre writers without giving them their due. Same feeling I got from much of Stephen Kingā€¦essentially a pulp writer that began repeating himself as he churned out books.

Entertaining but still derivative pulp

Re: Robert Graves, did you ever read Apuleius? The Metamorphosis/Golden Ass, God of Socrates/Defense of Magic/ Cupid and Psyche? (in the archaic translations?