"P.S. Your Children Are Not Safe Anywhere at Any Time"

How much trouble could only 2 Islamists cause the United States?

They Paralyzed and Terrorized Millions of D.C. Area Americans For 3 Weeks

image

Lee Malvo’s jailhouse picture of Osama bin Laden

The D.C. sniper attacks (also known as the Beltway sniper attacks) were a series of coordinated shootings that occurred during three weeks in October 2002 in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia. Ten people were killed and three others were critically wounded in the Baltimore-Washington Metropolitan Area and along Interstate 95 in Virginia.

The snipers were John Allen Muhammad (aged 41 at the time) and Lee Boyd Malvo (aged 17 at the time), who traveled in a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan. Their crime spree, begun in February 2002, included murders and robberies in the states of Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, and Washington, which resulted in seven deaths and seven wounded people; in ten months, the snipers killed 17 people and wounded 10 others.[1]

May 24, 2006 update : The snipers are back in the news, now that John Allen Muhammad is on trial in Montgomery County, Maryland, and Lee Boyd Malvo is for the first time testifying against him. Malvo had much to say during his five hours of testimony, including these points, quoted from a Washington Post report:

image

John Allen Muhammad on trial.

  • Muhammad’s ultimate goal was to indoctrinate 140 young homeless men at a compound in Canada who would “shut things down” in cities across the United States, Malvo testified.
  • Muhammad introduced Malvo to the Nation of Islam and spoke to him about race and socioeconomic disparities. “The white man is the devil,” Malvo said, summing up Muhammad’s thinking.
  • Under Muhammad’s tutelage, Malvo began a strict diet that involved taking 72 vitamins and eating only one meal a day.
  • Malvo said Muhammad told him he intended to recover his children, who were taken from him after he kidnapped them for 18 months. “No white man in a black robe is going to tell him when and where and why he can see his children,” Malvo said, quoting Muhammad.
  • The Sept. 11, 2001, attacks had a considerable impact on Muhammad. “He said bloodshed begets bloodshed,” Malvo said, summarizing Muhammad’s reaction. “It’s a process. America began this. Osama bin Laden didn’t develop in a vacuum.”
  • During summer 2002, Malvo said, Muhammad told him about the two-pronged scheme he had designed to terrorize the nation’s capital. Phase one was the month of random shootings. The next stage, which was intended to heighten the terror, involved setting explosive devices—which Muhammad told Malvo he had learned to use in the military—to kill massive numbers of children in the Baltimore area, Malvo testified.
  • Muhammad believed Montgomery County was the ideal place to unleash the terror, Malvo testified, because it was affluent and predominantly white.

The National Post adds:

  • Malvo said Muhammad told him, “We are going to go to the Washington, D.C., area, and we are going to terrorize these people,” relating how Muhammad hated America for its “slavery, hypocrisy [and] foreign policy.”

http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2003/08/the-beltway-snipers-motives

I remember this story, especially the details about the car that was used and how they had it rigged to shoot out of!

If they ever did a movie on this Denzel Washington should be casted to play the role.

1 Like

Defenders of Islam try to discount the danger to Americans from Jihadis.

However, we see how in 2002, only TWO of them paralyzed millions of Beltway area residents for three weeks.

This would have never happened if DC wasn’t so packed with Muslims. The beltway has been a hotbed of radical Islamist activity for decades and no one seems willing to do anything about it. The 9/11 mosque is inside the beltway as are countless other extremist organizations and halal meat money laundering operations.

1 Like

Anyone who likes this should save it because it is difficult to find using most search protocols.

The situation in the world today borders on the fantastic.

Never before in history has one civilization allowed large numbers of those who come from an alien, and immutably hostile situation, to settle deep within that first civilization’s borders.

Never before have the members of one civilization failed to investigate, and even willfully refused to investigate, or to listen to those who warn about, the consequences for all non-Muslims of the belief-system of Islam.

In history, the phenomenon of the Barbarians at the Gates is hardly new. Those barbarians lay siege; if they win, they enter in triumph. Should they lose, the advanced civilization survives.

But never before have the gates been opened, to an entering force that has not even been identified or understood.

Never before have the inhabitants of the by-now vulnerable city made efforts not to recognize, or realize, what they have done, and what they have undone.

That demographic intrusion shows no signs of diminishing.

The systematic building of mosques and madrasas, paid for by Saudi Arabia, everywhere in the Western world, helps to make the conduct of Muslim life easier.

Western populations have been trained to make much of “celebrating diversity” and “promoting difference” and constructing, on a base of militant but unexamined pluralism, an edifice of legal rights and entitlements.

These rights, these entitlements, this militant pluralism are exploited by Muslims who do not believe in pluralism.

Nor do they accept the individual rights of conscience and free speech, the legal equality of men and women, and of religious and racial minorities, recognized, for example, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Their current claim to support pluralism is based on the need to protect, and increase the power of, the Muslim umma, or Community, within the West, until such time as that umma no longer needs to pretend to have any interest in Western pluralism and Western values.