Even researcher from Yale are censored LOL. Believe in the experts unless they have an opposing viewpoint.
2 Likes
1 Like
I’m not in full agreement with David Icke, but it’s a good presentation.
China was merely a factory of the virus, not its inventor.
Yes, Mao and CCP were financed by the Rothschilds.
1 Like
And here we are today. Economy trashed, trillions in debt and rising. Have the efforts been productive in stopping or slowing the infection rat?
Apparently not.
You can do the comparison within the United States, thanks to this excellent study by five economists. The results are the same: whether you lock down or stay open shows no predictable pattern in deaths. If lockdowns saved lives, the curve should slant downwards to the right. It doesn’t slant at all. It’s seemingly random.
Once again, it’s almost as if the virus doesn’t care.
Source: Wallethub
Now, you can take apart this data on grounds that it is too aggregated, that there are too many variables based on demographics (average age of death the world over is 82 with comorbidities, nearly half in nursing homes), and so on.
At some point, we are going to have to throw in the towel. Whether a country locks down or stays open has as much predictive power over deaths per million as whether it rains today is related to the color of my socks. Or whether hurricanes are controlled by literacy rates.
In other words, the claim that lockdowns control viruses is pseudoscience or magical thinking of a deeply dangerous sort; it wrecks economies and lives.
To be sure, there are plenty of studies claiming that lockdowns saved lives but the high-profile ones are model-based extrapolations that presume the existence of a relationship that the facts do not seem to back up. If there is a broad-based research study using real data that demonstrates something life-saving about destroying rights and liberties in the name of virus control, I’ve yet to see it. (A disagreeing reader sends me this paper, which you are free to read and consider.)
Meanwhile, we are overwhelmed with evidence that it was all pointlessly destructive. Liberty means the practice of health and wealth; lockdowns lead to exactly what D.A. Henderson predicted: catastrophe.
“The relatively lows risk that the novel coronavirus poses to most people has been pointed out by Dr. John Ioannidis of Stanford University. Doctor Ioannidis is a widely-cited expert on evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, and clinical research. This is what he had to say last month in an interview with a Greek journalist: “For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%.” The interview and the statement went largely unreported. Dr Ioannidis is not the only world class epidemiologist who has been censored from mainstream news for his data-based conclusions. Rather than consulting these serious scientists, the media’s favorite go to person for all questions corona has been the camera-hungry but otherwise hapless Dr. Fauci who has made a number of statements and predictions that have turned out to be spectacularly wrong.”
1 Like
Why do you assume that the mainstream media will give us the true picture?
The mainstream outlets were created to deceive, either by the state or by rich banklsters who control the state.
1 Like
https://www.facebook.com/114675652492435/videos/991556734620784
10 Minutes of Science: Hydroxychloroquine
This is exactly what we all needed to know. Brilliant.
1 Like
Is this why they are doing it??
1 Like
He is not really a scientist.
He is one of the believers of the talmudic teaching.