I think liberal lunacy may be more contagious and dangerous than COVID-19. These liberal loons have a viral platform of controlling those that they can and demonizing those that they cannot.
This is a lot more serious infection that while it oddly hits a lot of young people with little to no symptoms, it hits those with co-morbidities in a multi-system fashion. This may be the virus itself or the collateral damage of cytokine storm tearing through the entire body. But this is hardly the seasonal flu.
No, it most certainly is not the seasonal flu, and doctors are concerned about long term organ damage to people who have survived extreme cases of it. Trump was the one peddling it as no different than the flu. All I said was that there are similarities in symptoms. Anybody that developes flu like symptoms ought to be getting tested For CV 19 ASAP…
Influenza of other strains do also. The associated implications of this one might be different, the occurrence of blood clots being one of them, but they can all render the victims just as dead? We’re also told to believe that this flu virus is far more contagious, but I can honestly say I don’t know anyone, nor have heard of anyone I do know, including supermarket staff with whom, over the years, I have established a rapport, who has caught it. Earlier on in the lockdown before measures were taken (such as plastic checkout screens) I casually mentioned to two or three of them that ‘I guess the schedules have been affected by this owing to staff sickness?’ and all of them responded that it wasn’t the case - although some had taken a few days voluntary isolation when they’d mistakenly thought they had. This is being bigged up out of sight, and we all know why?
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it’s a bloody duck in my book. This virus is only different to others because it can cause blood clots; not always, but sometimes. Blood clots are always fatal, but they can’t make anyone more dead than a destroyed pulmonary system, which all influenzas can cause.
Flu and CV are the same ‘animal’ (viral) and both can result in death, so WTF difference does it make which of them anyone dies from? The only difference I can perceive - reading between the lines of all the agenda-driven CV scaremongering - is there are far more deaths from flu than CV.
Good lord really? No, blood clots are not always fatal in fact you rarely even notice them.
Every time you have a bruise yhou have blood clotting under your skin because veins, arteries, and/or capillaries were ruptured and leaked.
Even if they make it to your heart, lungs, or brain they are rarely fatal and rarely even more than temporarily debilitating if they are noticed at all.
About 80-85% of heart attacks are due to blood clots and about the same percentage of strokes. Most of both of which of course are usually survivable.
As for the difference in CCPV and Influenza it’s the structure that is different as are many of the effects on the body.
Go learn something for a change and quit spouting fabricated BS.
Oh just fuck off with your splitting hairs and idiotic word games - there’s a big difference between coagulation and a full-on blood clot . . . you clot!