Don’t bother reading the article. You are as guilty as I, of bias, it would seem.
I don’t need to for obvious reasons that I just stated! Its another opinion piece that you are trying to peddle out and make into a conversation! Can you be any more obvious?
Well, unless you read it, and respond to the merits or fallacies contained within, you have no point.
I did not watch the entire Jeanine video, because she is a known Trump propoganda cog.
If you read the article i posted, i will watch the Jeanine video.
I actually do have a point!
Its my opinion that your rhetoric comes off as being disingenuous and disrespectful to other members on this site, so excuse me if my responses to you is less than lets say treated with a guarded skepticism.
This was your first response to me today, and you already start by putting me and others on the defensive by stating an opinion by trying to insult the sources we had an opinion on. IMO not a very effective way to engage in a two way conversation with people who may differ in their views with your own. Then you try to call me out for not reading your propaganda bullshit you post? Yeah gotcha! I see how you roll!
Go back to bed!
Ok, i started watching… its painful. Accusations of an attempted coup? Fear tactics! Because the voters deserve to know what happened with the election? Now all of a sudden it’s a coup?
I will defer to others here to address you directly to answer this question, I simply can’t be bothered.
I did post a two part series yesterday on “Spygate” thread. I suggest you go there and watch them, as there is no bias in its presentation just the actual facts presented. REAL JOURNALISM! Then get back here to see if you feel the same way!
If you can’t handle my opinions, which aren’t very extreme, by any stretch, i dont know what to say.
I am trying to have an honest discussion.
If you think judge Jeanine is a neutral source, then I’m sorry. It’s this kind of divide that makes us weaker as a nation.
Again I think you have a serious reading comprehension problem that hints at your confirmation bias that is regularly practiced in the rhetoric you put out to others! You simply need to look at how you talk to people to know what I am saying and what it means. If you put people on the defensive then you already lost any argument you set forth as an opinion.
That is all from me now, as I need to go try out a new Taylor guitar! In other words I got better things to do!
BA BA bye!
And i think you have a problem with the english language. If you’re going to attack my rhetoric, make sure your grammar is correct.
Being a grammar nazi doesn’t make look any smarter here. I think you posting this while I was in the middle of making my corrections only reveals your disingenuous character and intentions! Enough said!
When your grammar is so bad that I don’t know what your point was, it’s hard to respond oherwise.
The maybe you should just grow the fuck up and stop practicing your passive aggressive behavior here with others!
BA BA bye! Once again!
If you can’t recognize that he inadvertently omitted a “you” in his sentence, then you don’t deserve recognition as a serious debater.
1 Like
Oh, the anger!
Like I’ve said said before, I don’t really care about this petty stuff. The only reason I’m here is because I think it’s important for people with differing opinions to discuss issues that affect all of us.
We all get passionate about these things, but I want to believe that we are on the same side.
Fair, but that omission made the interpretation more difficult than my brain could handle.
Hence my response.
…
I can be passive agressive, for sure. I get worked up about things, buts it’s not my intention to end a productive conversation about relevant isssues.
Your response was degrading. I am trying to be conciliatory, in order to further the conversation.
Dave, I read the article you’ve linked, so what was your point?
Trump and Judge Pirro are friends, so she cant be unbiased?
was that your point?
This is pretty funny!
1 Like