Kavanaugh has now “amended” a single word to correct a factual error in his opinion after being called out on his sloppiness and plain untruthy-ness of his work. The Vermont Secretary of State has already berated him again for ignoring the bigger picture of his tantamount failure in this opinion, and only (barely) addressing the explicit factual inaccuracy of a single statement.
So…when was the last time a sitting Justice was so called-out publicly about an error ridden opinion, and required to humiliate themself by issuing one or more corrections of fact?
His clerks must be equally as stupid as they should have caught his sloppy work and corrected it, but apparently he only hires people intellectually inferior to him, which really isn’t saying a whole lot based on this flawed and factually incorrect decision.
Again, this thread has nothing to do with me being a lawyer. It has to do with a widely publicized decision rendered by Kavanaugh that was incredibly sloppy and filled with factual errors.
And you called me as Low info yet you quote a rag like “Slate” ? Are you serious? You better look in the mirror snowflake!
This all speaks to the inflamed state of Kavanaugh’s critics the week before a hotly contested election rather than to the merits of his concurrence, which is commonsensical and accords with a plain reading of the Constitution.`
The same side that decries voter suppression when advocacy for voter ID is made!
This source is not exactly right wing and they even said his ruling was correct! You truly are suffering delusional myopia!
