Is White Genocide in Our Future?

Whites are not quite yet the minority in the US and yet we already see the anti-white agenda coming to the fore. Imagine how much worse things are going to get. That’s diversity, folks, conflict between the races.

“The perception that mass shootings are a “white man’s problem” lingers around the country because white mass shooters tend to get more publicity. And, the twisted young male who goes on a public shooting spree fits a certain kind of media narrative. But when we actually study the mass shootings that took place in 2019, it’s clear that Patrick Crusius and Connor Betts are not the norm, but aberrations.

“Mass shooters have no particular ideology. Crusius and Betts were opposites ideologically. (Though both cared deeply about the environment.) Nor are mass shooters a white problem or a black problem. Over the same bloody weekend, William Patrick Williams, who is African-American, appeared in court after being arrested by the FBI for planning to shoot up a Texas hotel with an AK-47 rifle.

“Looking at the data from the Mass Shooting Tracker, widely utilized by the media, as of this writing, of the 72 mass shooters, perpetrators in shootings that killed or wounded 4 or more people, whose race is known, 21 were white, 37 were black, 8 were Latino, and 6 were members of other groups.

All the while the media ignores the black on black genocide in many major cities.

Is it that the media has a highly left tilt in their reporting?

1 Like

Paul Craig Roberts, who is some kind of boomer political guru, is getting on the same page. As are many others.

Clearly in the Western media and US Democratic Party it is open season on all white people. The most intense hatred is expressed against them—even calls for their extermination—and it doesn’t qualify as hate speech or encouraging violence.

The hatred and demonization of white people in America is no different from the propaganda against ■■■■ in the Third Reich. Yet not a single member of the Democratic Party or American print, TV, and NPR radio protests.

That fact tells us all we need to know. If white people don’t get organized and defend themselves there is likely to be a white holocaust.”


No doubt the same concerns and conversations around the evening campfires amongst Native Americans when the white Europeans discovered the last frontier they could exploit believing it gods manifest destiny for themselves. Kharma

1 Like

Well I tell you what, I may be native American but when the SHTF its the white conservatives where my money is on of having the last bullet!

1 Like

What are you talking about?

Don’t liberals make the argument that we have “progressed” beyond that kind of thinking? I think when someone uses the argument that “other people must have felt a certain way” they are acknowledging that what is happening is wrong but they are being too weak to stand up and stop it. It’s really sad because we are all taught that we aren’t supposed to tolerate this kind of blatant racism, but now it’s okay to be incredibly racist and hateful towards white people. It’s not right.

I’m talking about Native American genocide, seems intelligible enough. And that’s really not a liberal or conservative thing. Btw, where is the racism and hate towards white people in my comment? I’m white, and not real proud of the way my ancestors conducted themselves with regard to the slaughter and broken treaties with the indigenous people they found when they arrived. Surely you’re not excusing that…

We and my people don’t really care about your white guilt, and you certainly don’t speak for me or my ancestors! Genocide has happened in all races throughout human history, that doesn’t mean subsequent generations should have to pay a debt that they are not responsible for! It’s people like you that perpetuates the myths created by reappropriating culture for your silly agenda and it is the main reason that is preventing real progress from happening!

Can you ignorant liberals ever be honest with yourselves?

Why is that in quotations? You’re not quoting me…:man_shrugging:

I think they call that paraphrasing.

1 Like

Every culture, nation, society, etc. etc. etc., runs it’s course. I always believed, the very root of all human misery, in some way, shape, or form, was greed. Power, wealth, property, control, etc.

1 Like

9 out of 10 native Americans that died was the result of not having the same immune system as European because native Americans did not have livestock for farming there immune system was not as developed so when Europeans bring new diseases the natives were vulnerable to them

Well I can probably share common ground with you on this.

Those numbers are debatable amongst scholars, but certainly higher with the eastern tribes who had the earliest contact, and sometimes intentionally. But one cannot escape the broad consensus that they were savages worthy of extermination. Many officers in command of army’s dispatched to protect pioneering Americans in pursuit of ever more Indian lands and resources pursued according to their own personal agendas, committing all manor of atrocities, far from Washington with no supervision, and never so much as reprimand.

Manifest destiny was uniquely American and not only the indigenous peoples, but those that had moved up from the south and occupied the south west region were displaced or relieved of their possession as well. When the Mayflower landed, Santa Fe was already in existence.

As a white person in this century, why should I have any guilt over what occurred in the 19th and 20th centuries. I wasn’t born until 1949. Yes, there were alot of injustices done by white people but I didn’t have any part of it.
White Genocidemay happen if a conflict occurs between white and black extremists.

You shouldn’t, you can be ashamed of it, do your small part to ensure there’s never a repeat. You’re apparently old enough to have seen a lot of the pre civil rights era overt bigotry and discrimination visited upon African Americans, unless you ever contributed to that or any of the generally more covert bigotry and discrimination that seems sempiternal today, then you should have no guilt.

Maybe all the black ( so called ) African king’s ( descendants ) who sold other blacks to the Arab slavers, along with the Arab slaver’s decendants, should share the guilt. But no, it’s always about whites. What a fucking crock of fermented shit. I never owned a slave, nor did any of my ancestors; but I did have ancestors who were sold into slavery. I want my reparations. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa So Buckwheat get the fuck in line.

1 Like

This is a read; but it’s well researched. So take the time or don’t. It’s up to you. 3. The violent nature of Blacks. First
rationale for Apartheid.
By Mike Smith
Mike Smith Political Commentary7
26 April 2010
Many white South Africans feel guilty about Apartheid, they feel as if they actually did
something evil or bad, but that is totally wrong.
Ex president De Klerk apologised for Apartheid8 and so did the Dutch Reform Church
Dominee, Swanepoel who also started pulling out his intestines about Apartheid and
apologised on behalf of the entire church without any mandate from anyone of the
congregation. Ds Swanepoel se derm uitrygery oor Apartheid9
So when such “leaders” tell us how wrong we were, then we tend to believe them. But let us
look at the truth.
Anyone who knows the history of South Africa will know that nobody suffered more on the
soil of South Africa, no one has bled as much as the Afrikaners and their descendants the
Boers. The Whites of South Africa and specifically the Afrikaners have nothing to be sorry for.
In fact the Blacks owe them a tremendous gratitude and a gigantic apology for the way they
treated Whites in the last 350 years.
The Afrikaners have a song that is taught to all Afrikaans kids from the crib and that every
Afrikaner today knows. The name of this song is called, “Siembamba”. The lyrics are so heavy
that I almost do not want to repeat it here. But it goes like this,
“Siembamba, mama se kindjie,
Siembamba, mama se kindjie
–draai sy nek om, gooi hom in die sloot;
trap op sy kop dan is hy dood.”
For our international readers I will freely translate and then explain.
“Siembamba, mommies little child,
Siembamba, mommies little child,
–Wring his neck, throw him in the ditch,
Step on his head, then he is dead…”
Believe it or not…this is a song Afrikaans people sing to their children while rocking them to
It records the brutality of the Xhosas who would indiscriminately kill white women and white
babies during the nine Kaffir wars. Black men are mostly cowards who are only brave when in

Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box, Mike Smith: 8
packs. They actually seldom engage in head on confrontation with White men. When they
attack it is always in groups, while people are asleep. Their preferred targets are the elderly,
women and children.
A common myth amongst foreigners and South Africans alike is that they think that before
the White man came to Africa, Blacks lived in peace and harmony with nature and with each
This harmony with nature is not entirely wrong. It is the perception of “In harmony with
nature” that is misunderstood.
People want to believe that nature is pure and good and that the lion lies with the lamb, but
reality is far removed from that. When one sees how hyenas tear a live animal apart, how a
praying mantis bites the head off her mate after copulation how the Streptococcus bacteria
can destroy human flesh, one is left with a feeling that nature can be very cruel.
Nature amongst African blacks have always been very cruel. Blacks who supposedly lived in
tune with nature were regularly eaten by lions, crocodiles, bitten by snakes, stung by
scorpions and their numbers controlled by insects like the mosquito (Malaria) or the Tsetse
fly(sleeping sickness). Yellow fever and Cholera were other forms of nature to control the
numbers of Blacks…
But it has to be said that before the white people came to Africa, the most effective way
Blacks controlled their own populations were with genocidal tribal wars…and cannibalism.
Let me point out some of the psyche of the Blacks in order to try and understand his petty
jealousy and envy.
Amongst the Black communities it is not allowed for individuals to show ingenuity or
individualistic prosperity. The moment one Black person starts to rise a little above the
others, he will be the first one to be hammered down by the community like a nail in a
wooden floor. Those who do prosper are ostracised by their black tribes and it will be said of
them that they are not real blacks that they are whites with a black skin…
That mentality still persists to this day, but this petty envy is accompanied with an inbred,
inextinguishable, brutality that the whites of Africa came face to face with and learned
about the hard way.
Ever since the white man set foot on South African soil, he has been shocked and horrified at
the brutality of the blacks. No matter how much the whites wanted to believe in the
“equality of man”, they were sadly confronted only with the brutality and reality of Stone
Age savages.
Blacks of central Africa sold other blacks they have conquered into slavery to Arabs, other
black tribes and also to whites. The moment one tribe had a bit more than the others, they
would be prone to a nocturnal raid by neighbouring tribes who would kill all the men, rape
the women and children, steal the cattle and incorporate the women and children into their
own tribes.
Tribes who were not strong enough would flee the area. In sub Saharan Africa it meant that
nobody wanted to flee north, because they knew it was a desert where they could not
survive. So the only way was to flee south. The weakest of the weakest tribes were right in
the front, followed by a slightly stronger tribe, followed by ever increasing stronger tribes
further north, driving the weaker ones south.
Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box, Mike Smith: 9
Roundabout the same time that whites first settled in South Africa, black tribes first entered
South Africa. They were contemporary settlers of the area now known as South Africa. In
some areas whites were the first and in others, blacks were the first.
Blacks moving South and Whites moving north looking for better grazing for their cattle
eventually met at the Fish and the Kei rivers around 1770…About 120 years after the Whites
first (permanently) settled at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652 . To put it into perspective, it
was about the same time as New York was founded in the USA.
Who were these Blacks they met at the Fish River? They were the Xhosa. The Xhosa were
fleeing from the Zulus who murdered them en masse. Even until today the word or name
“Xhosa” in Zulu is synonymous with the word “coward”.
The animosity between the Xhosas and the Zulus goes back hundreds of years. Mandela and
Mbeki, the two previous presidents were both Xhosas, but the current president, Jacob Zuma
is a Zulu. Zulus and Xhosas hate each other more than they hate whites and that says a lot.
But why do the other Blacks of South Africa hate the Zulus? It goes back to “King” Shaka.
Note I put “King” in inverted commas. Blacks can never be kings of any kind…before one can
be a King, one should first be a MAN.
Shaka was a sadistic psychopath who committed genocide on a larger scale than Rwanda has
ever seen. The Zulus wiped out entire tribes, entire cultures in what is today known as the
Mfecane or Dfecane (Annihilation). Shaka’s terror was so great that Mzilikazi, the chief of the
Matabeles fled BACK NORTH…direction where Zimbabwe is today.
Amongst all this chaos arrived the White man in the region of the Xhosas. They fought nine
“Wars” against the Xhosa between 1811 and 1879. The Frontier Wars, Kaffir wars or Xhosa
Everytime the wars were about Xhosas stealing cattle and other livestock, burning down
homesteads, killing not only white farmer families in the most horrific torturing ways, but
also the coloureds who worked for the whites.
It was at the time of the sixth Kaffir war that Piet Retief decided to trek with the other
Piet Retief and his party thought they could negotiate and buy land from the Zulus, but they
were massacred on a hill at the kraal of the Zulu King, Dingaan when they respected the
wishes of Dingaan to leave their weapons outside.
Every man and boy, around 100 in total, were clubbed to death. Retief was the last to be
killed, so as to witness the death of his comrades.
Dingaan then ordered all Voortrekker laagers to be attacked along the Bushman’s River. An
orgy of violence started. Families were camped at Bloukrans, Dorinkop, Moordspruit, etc.
Cowardly blacks would attack them during the middle of the night, killing everyone in the
most horrific ways. Women were brutally gang raped and pregnant women were cut open,
their babies killed in front of them while they still lived. Small children and babies were
picked up by their feet and their heads smashed against the sides of the wagons.

Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box, Mike Smith: 10
Among the Voortrekkers , 41 men, 56 women and 185 children were killed. In addition
another 250 or 252 Khoikhoi and Basuto that accompanied the Voortrekkers were killed. A girl
called Johanna van der Merwe (12 years old at the time) sustained 21 assegai wounds, but
managed to survive.
The Voortrekkers built the town Weenen (meaning wailing) at the site.
The Bloukrans Massacre11
Throughout the following decades up until the present day the whites of South have
experienced this petty envy and brutality at the hands of blacks. Examples are legion. Boers
retaliated at Makapansgat12 where blacks savagely murdered whites in the most horrific ways.
Hermanus Potgeter was tied down to a rock bed and skinned alive like an animal while still
conscious, he died while the blacks ripped his organs out.
More lately we saw the brutal black on black murders with the necklace method13 . We saw
blacks storming into white churches with AK 47’s and hand grenades, opening fire on the
unarmed congregation such as at the St James Church massacre14. We have seen everything
from brutal Muti murders15 to the evil torture preceding the brutal killings of White farmers
and their family members in Rhodesia, Namibia and also in South Africa, most of the time
nothing stolen. More than 3000 White farmers and family members murdered to date since
the ANC took over in 1994.
It is necessary to reiterate that this violent nature of blacks are not directed at whites only,
so the black behaviour apologetics who claim that this behaviour is retribution for wrongs
committed by whites against blacks, have no leg to stand on, because most often than not
this black violent nature is directed at their own kind as we have seen with Shaka’s defecane,
Muti murders and necklacing.
No, this brutality, this murderous, stealing and other asocial behaviour of Blacks could never
and can never be reconciled with the behaviour of the deeply religious and pious Boers of
South Africa.
This violent behaviour of blacks was one of the rationales for Apartheid. The other was
cultural differences. More on that in the next edition. For now it is important to realise that
whites in South Africa never wanted to rule blacks.

I would suggest you start living in the present. You have no more control over what people did 200 years ago than you do with what your neighbor eats for breakfast.

1 Like