Before I pee up this rope, why don’t you tell me what, other than detailed reports of the event from several news outlets, would you consider conclusive?
Then you may tell me why your gainsaying is justified.
You got your ass beat…
You’re old and uninformed…
THIS IS NEVER OLD …
Why do you prattle?
Just take your beating like the omega cur you are…
Did I mention “impotent”?
An identified source for the story.
Multiple outlets running the same story doesn’t make it credible. Identified sources that can be verified make a story credible.
2 Likes
I did.
No need to feed the troll.
At least not on my end. 
2 Likes
Your faith must be strong.
details can make the story credible…
The readiness of other news sources to put THEIR cred on the line can make it credible…
Consistency with past experience…
Or Navarro publicly acknowledging that it occurred.
No they can’t, anyone can fabricate a conversation that never happened.
2 Likes
yes they can…but again, what we know tells us that it is not the case in this instance…
Further, if your standards prevailed, the entire FOXNews archive would fit on a 3×5 index card and Regnery would be publishing erotica.
“I’d bet on President Trump’s intuition,” Peter Navarro told Fox News,
He’s an idiot…
If Deplorables want to get ahead of what’s gonna be widely asked, I urge you to consider the case of S. Korea.
Cause that, folks, is the difference between a rational and pragmatic approach and a cranks, charlatans and cretins cluster dry hump.
All we know is that the story was printed by sources that are routinely if not always hostile to this administration who have a record of printing crap that cannot be verified at all and when it is, often proves to be completely false.
You believe it and lend credibility to it because it fits with your own bias, nothing more.
1 Like
No…that’s Denial.
There is no media conspiracy…Donald Trump is an awful POTUS and an even worse human being…all his former appointees aren’t lying about that.
Navarro confirmed the incident when asked about it…it’s done.
And no…
There is no history of false stories about Grifty…unless you want to list them.
We know the stuff is now politically charged, and that Navarro is a brazen flunky on par with Larry Kudlow…
Larry Kudlow, a flunky? We’re talking someone who worked in Reagan’s Office of Management and budget, later on became economics editor for National Review Online. He served as counsel to Art Laffer, (the genius behind the miracle Reagan years).
This guy has more credibility and credentials than the last FIVE Democrat presidents and their flunkies combined.
Fauci makes very nice window dressing, but he has been wrong in a lot of calculations. He has also been misquoted a bunch of times.
Thing is. President Trump surrounds himself with brilliant independent thinkers. They don’t always agree on everything and certainly aren’t in Nazi lockstep like Obama’s incompetent minions.
But suggesting Larry Kudlow, (probably the most brilliant living economist in America today) as a flunky, is idiotic.
4 Likes
Kuddles did 2 stints in crack rehab…
He was the porch economist at Bear Stearns…he is awful…he has no credibility as an economist…
Behold…
That’s not a “faux pas”…that’s a declaration of incompetence.
I’m supposed to be impressed by a left wing rag’s OPINION of Kudlow? Fake news lies all the time. And National Review kinda trumps MarketWatch in the credibility arena.
4 Likes
Excuse me, but Alzheimer Joe doesn’t even know what state he is in, half the time. He even announced on this campaign trail that he was running for the U.S.Senate. And he was vice president to the worst, most incompetent president in history: Barack Hussein.
And he’ll be going up against the greatest president of all time: Trump. And the economy will have bounced back by then.
It’s not even going to be close. Even Democrat voter fraud will not eke out a victory for that old man.
5 Likes
Kuddles made his idiotic comment on FOXBusiness as Celebrated Cipher and Ruminate, Mooh-ria Bartiromo sat there nodding.
And I’m in finance…no one reads nro for economic analysis.