I’ve not thrown a hissy fit. I explained to you where the proof you wanted was (in your profile under ACTIVITY) and you asked how much of it you should quote in a new reply.
Since you’re the one that wanted to see it, it’s beyond stupid for you to think you need to post it for me to read.
You are one fucked up dude, Little Cowboy. You apparently have no sense of logic.
The challenge isn’t for you to find another assertion to demonstrate the truth of your original assertion…
Because you wilted, I asked you how many examples I needed to post to make lie of your claim…
Then you wilted again…
You’ve spent decades delegating your “thinking”, to the extent you ever did any, to idiots with soothing voices, preying on your ready credulity.
It’s come to the point where you’re hornswoggled by some blogger to deny History, CBO, and OMB…
You leverage the standard deplorable blatherskite with unwarranted arrogance…don’t do it here, it’s just further to fall.
You are correct about that claim. I initially said you should post them all rather than cherry pick the few that are not examples of your puerility. Then withdrew that in favor of avoiding wasted broadband. I need no proof of anything from you.
Anyone that wants to see proof of my claim regarding your posting habits can read all of your posts and draw their own conclusions.
Your dragging up your previous denial of being proven wrong about the Clinton surplus myth has absolutely nothing to do with this issue.
I see this thread has been moved to the Conspiracy box, too. Congratulations! 
Since you abdicated your rhetorical responsibility…as I recall, you insist that I never post substance, or sourced info, so all I need is one…if you wanted statistical relevance, we’d need a representative sample.
But that’s not what this is about…this is about you sulking over having your inadequacy exposed…
[quote]Your dragging up your previous denial of being proven wrong about the Clinton surplus myth has absolutely nothing to do with this issue.
[/quote]
No, it’s another example of me being unambiguously correct and you being credulous, and dishonest (as it is clear that you didn’t read your links).
For no other reason than you threw a hissy…
You must be proud.
Perhaps you should ask in a private message why it got moved.
perhaps if a thread is moved, a reason should be given
Not required. I could have moved it myself and not had to tell you why.
So you engaged a proxy…
No mystery why…
I just wonder if you think that precedent is worth it.
No. Just go to the top of the thread and click on the edit pencil. You’ll see who did it and when it was done. If you want to raise hell about it, you’d best be polite. Like I said, a private message is recommended.
Few problems…
It is OBVIOUSLY arbitrary given that both deal, not with conjecture or extrapolation, but simple reporting of fact.
Further, a thread dedicated to the “Deep State” conspiracy remains.
As this has no apparent sign of a moderator action taken in response to an offense, I can’t see why the question is forbidden…
but then, logic is my thing, not yours.
You are obtuse. Go to the top of the thread and click on the pencil. Then message the person that moved it and ask him why he moved it.
Logic ain’t really yore thang!
Dotard,
Please stop nattering…
You could just deny that either move was an accommodation.
Since I made neither of them, I can’t address the reasons. Have you bothered to even find out who moved it?
You can deny that you requested them…that will only leave your L’il Pard.
I second that 
If you’ll do as I suggested, you will see who did it. If you want to know why, ask him why he did it. That is all I have to say on this issue.
Your reticence speaks volumes…
Thanks.
Your density outweighs it…exponentially.
you’re hurt…
I’d like to say I’m dismayed, but…