I think Iran has a few of those in the Straits of Hormuz too.
Aircraft carriers are basically for countries engaged in foreign aggression.
They represent the concept of war in the 20th century.
To on Iran and Muslim groups,you have be direct and show them that you mean business. They only respect a show of force and back down when faced with overwhelming military force.Then they become cowardly and resort to TERRORISM and being irritating.
1 Like
You probably mean the US.
The Zionist US/Saudi/Israel alliance is the biggest source of terrorism in the world.
Digi, are you smoking or inhaling something that makes you this DELUSIONAL!!!
Zionists (and their flunkies aka shabbos goys) are delusional.
Prophet Ezekiel talks about the violent demise of Gog and Magog (Israel) and the allies (the US and NATO).
Itâs not the question of how and why, but when.
Yes.
It is an alliance of convenienceâmuch as our alliance with Stalin, in the 1940s, was also.
Yep, along with Saudi Arabia and Israel.
2 Likes
Or even many of our alliances today.
Politics is always a matter of convenience and wars are extensions of politics.
Politics is not limited to human behavior: animals wage wars (one band against another, as observed among Madagascar lemurs, etc.) as well as obedience to Alpha, while Beta is always looks for a chance to overthrow Alpha.
Solitary animals also defend his or her territory, and the Australian cassowary can easily kill a human with her kick.
Bottom line: Iran is not alone and it is a folly to attack Iran, even if Israel wants the US to do so (without dirtying its hands, of course, totally at the expense of American tax payers and American lives, as usual)
1 Like
Digi, Israel would defeat Iran because they are tacitally superior and the field commanders have freedom to act from the upper command .
Iran showed their incompetence in the war with Iraq . They have little regard with taking casualties. Israeli equipment maintenance is way ahead of Iranâs and the Israeli Air Force would eliminate Iranâs in 48hrs max.Irans military doesnât scare to many countries.
1 Like
If so, why wouldnât Israel attack Iran?
It is not the purpose of Iranâs military.
They want to cause enough damage, so that anybody considering an attack against Iran will think twice.
Same philosophy for the Swiss military.
Iran was handicapped by the US in that war. In our schizophrenic foreign policy, Hussein was our ally thenâŚ
1 Like
Digi, I hope youâre intelligent enough to know that Israel will not attack Iran unless they launch missile strikes against them. If that happens, all bets are off when Israel retaliates. They could take F-4 Phantoms and destroy Irans Air Force.
Israel wonât attack them first.Iran may have numbers but Israel had all the intangibles and are alot smarter.
Russia and China are fed up with western aggression in the Middle East and Iran is ally to both of them. So thatâs not going to happen.
That simply is NOT true. Israel has assassinated many Iranian scientists on the streets of Tehran just because they believed Iran was working on nuclear weapons.
Israel has also launched air strikes on Iran in the past as preemptive measures, not having been attacked themselves.
1 Like
Ha!
Who do you think tried to nuke Hawaii in January 2018 (to unleash a WWIII)?
Only the psychopathic leader of paranoid Israel would do that.
Monte, Russia and Communist China want to spread their type of "influence "world wide,
Of course they do, does that strike you as odd. The US has been doing the same thing for 75 yearsâŚ
We arenât spreading Communism, like Russia and Communist China, we want governments that favor us sometimes at the expense of human rights.