I’m about head out to fish but I think what you are talking about from a business perspective makes sense. Thing is, this isn’t a business. We are all voluntarily here, the staff are all volunteers, and @Patriot voluntarily provides this space as a public service - his reasoning why is actually kind of impressive. I won’t steal his thunder but he ain’t the bragging type. I know @Patriot personally and know he has never made a dime off this and spends a good amount of his own time and money to keep the lights on, provide upgrades, and fight those who try to get the site taken down. He’s been at this for years.
Point is, with so many different opinions and views you can’t keep everyone happy all the time. Try to please one group and you piss off another. The balance is everybody respecting the fact that they have a right to post their views and not be personally attacked for them. How much simpler does it need to get?
The triumph of ultimate evil is the New World Order.
It sometimes amazes me that some members (of sites which discuss social issues) are not familiar with this concept.
This day and age (meaning, from the 19th century on, and especially after 911), “evil” has a definite NWO tone, be it Epstein (I never said he was ■■■■■■■ but Epstein certainly is a ■■■■■■ name), Mossad, or destruction of Europe.
It has 850+ posts because management won’t put an end to it. But there is absolutely no doubt that it is a shit thread.
As has been explained to you guys many times, if the blaitant anti Semitic filth being posted in this Forum goes unchallenged, it would be seen by any casual observer as evidence that this site is nothing more than another racist hate site on par with sites like Storm Front. Is that what you want?
The anti-Semitic hatred is interjected into almost every consequential thread of a political nature. It is virtually impossible to avoid if you are an active member of this Forum. And, it seems, that when anyone flags those posts for derailing a thread, the flagger is the one who gets in trouble. What conclusion should one draw from that?
That’s rich, dude. Here we are a few of us defending a people who are not even here to defend themselves, a people for whose freedom from nazis our soldiers fought and died. And we do so, powerless, as a minority here knowing that the great body of members here as well as the moderators are ■■■ haters, long time birds of a feather bound even by personal friendship. And you call us bullies.
You both step up and own who you are. You don’t pretend to be just defending free speech or fair moderating while all the time simply providing a facade, a protection for you ■■■ haters to ply your trade of hate mongering.
In that sense, you are better than those who pretend to be fair and honest and concerned about freedom of speech…but are filled with as much malice as you yourself are… but not honest enough to admit it.
First off, I don’t “hate” ■■■■■
I hate criminals and hypocrites regardless of their religion, race, gender, etc.
Why is the act of revealing true history considered anti-XXXX-ism?
Because these name-callers are afraid and panicked.
They are on the same boat as the Clintons.
German ■■■■ loved Hitler (who had a number of ■■■■■■ generals in his Wehrmacht) and many nazis were ■■■■■ not to mention Adolf Eichmann and the other Adolf.
A true and honest moderator would have responded with…
“Thank you. I do understand the good intentions of side “B”. But those good intentions conflict with the goals of this forum. We moderators will get together and try harder to find ways that will satisfy all “sides”, “A” and “B” as well our commitment to free speech.”