Don't Expect Joe Biden's Travel Ban To Save America From the Omicron Variant. That horse has left the barn

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, belated and strangely selective U.S. restrictions on international travelers created the appearance of doing something without having much of an impact on disease transmission. The Biden administration’s response to the omicron variant has been notably swifter, but it still seems unlikely to work as advertised.

Last Wednesday, the South African government shared information about the omicron variant of the coronavirus, which features mutations that suggest it may be even more contagious than the delta variant. It is still not clear whether that is actually true, whether the new variant is more likely to cause severe symptoms, or whether vaccination is less effective against it than it is against earlier iterations of the virus, either in preventing infection or in preventing hospitalization and death.

Two days after news of the omicron variant broke, President Joe Biden announced a ban on visitors from South Africa and seven other African countries: Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, and Zimbabwe. With limited exceptions, noncitizens who were “physically present” in any of those countries during the previous 14 days will be denied entry to the United States and barred from U.S.-bound flights. The suspension will be reevaluated on a monthly basis to determine whether it is still appropriate.

The suspension did not take effect until this morning, which is the first clue that the policy is more symbolic than substantive. The travel ban “won’t even start until Monday, as if the virus takes the weekend off,” New York Times columnist Zeynep Tufekci noted yesterday. “That’s pandemic theatrics, not public health.”

Biden’s proclamation does not apply to U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Legally, that makes sense, since the president is relying on his authority under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which applies to “aliens” whose entry he deems “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” But if spending time in the countries targeted by Biden means someone may have been exposed to the omicron variant, that risk does not disappear simply because a potential carrier is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident. And if the risk can be managed through measures short of barring entry—such as testing and, where appropriate, isolation—why not apply those safeguards uniformly?

While existing PCR tests can distinguish between omicron and other variants, Biden’s proclamation does not explicitly address screening of travelers, although it says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “shall implement other mitigation measures for travelers” departing for the U.S. from the eight specified countries “as needed.” Under current regulations, U.S.-bound travelers who are not fully vaccinated must present a negative result from a viral test on a sample taken no more than a day before they travel. For fully vaccinated travelers, the sample can be taken up to three days before departure.

The geographic scope of Biden’s proclamation is also questionable, since COVID-19 cases involving the omicron variant have been identified in many other places, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the U.K. “This could possibly be the tip of the iceberg,” Dutch Health Minister Hugo de Jonge told reporters yesterday. NPR notes that “one of the identified cases of the omicron variant in Belgium had no contact or travel with any nations in southern Africa, suggesting community spread could already be taking place.”

This is starting to look like a recapitulation of what happened at the beginning of the pandemic, when many countries imposed travel restrictions after the coronavirus already was spreading locally. According to modeling by researchers at Northeastern University, for instance, New York City may have had more than 10,000 COVID-19 infections by March 1, 2020, seeded primarily by European travelers. That was 10 days before then-President Donald Trump announced restrictions on travel from Europe. The prospect that Biden’s reaction, although much faster, will be too little and too late to be effective seems especially likely if the omicron variant proves as contagious as scientists fear.

“There is very little utility [from] these kinds of bans,” Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute of Global Health, told NPR. “If the [aim] is to prevent the variant from coming in, it really doesn’t make sense to exempt countries where it has been identified and that [have] even more direct flights than southern Africa….Unfortunately, from what we know about the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 and the epidemiology of this variant, the horse has probably left the barn.”

Israel, Japan, and Morocco have responded to the new variant by banning all foreign visitors. Morocco’s two-week ban includes citizens, while the other two countries are excluding foreign nationals. “Unvaccinated Israelis will have to self-quarantine for seven days,” The New York Times reports, while “returning vaccinated Israelis will be tested upon landing and must self-quarantine for three days, pending results of another P.C.R. test.” Australia said it was delaying a plan to resume the admission of international students, skilled migrants, and visitors from Japan and South Korea. Other governments are banning travelers from specific countries.

The World Health Organization (WHO), meanwhile, is warning that such restrictions could cause more harm than they prevent. “Travel restrictions may play a role in slightly reducing the spread of COVID-19 but place a heavy burden on lives and livelihoods,” WHO’s regional director for Africa, Matshidiso Moeti, said yesterday. “If restrictions are implemented, they should not be unnecessarily invasive or intrusive, and should be scientifically based.”

Research on the effectiveness of international travel restrictions in curtailing the spread of COVID-19 and other contagious diseases has generated mixed results.

A review published by the Journal of Emergency Management in early 2020 found “minimal evidence” that travel bans decreased the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS), Ebola, or Zika. The authors emphasized the “urgent need for additional research to inform policy decisions on the use of travel bans and other control measures.”

An April 2020 study of COVID-19 published in Science found that “the travel quarantine of Wuhan delayed the overall epidemic progression by only 3 to 5 days in mainland China.” According to the researchers’ modeling, the quarantine “had a more marked effect on the international scale, where case importations were reduced by nearly 80% until mid-February.” But the study indicated that the quarantine’s impact was not sustained and that restrictions on travel to and from China did not have a large additional effect.

“The model indicates that although the Wuhan travel ban was initially effective at reducing international case importations, the number of imported cases outside mainland China will continue to grow after 2 to 3 weeks,” the authors reported. “Furthermore, the modeling study shows that additional travel limitations (up to 90% of traffic) have only a modest effect unless paired with public health interventions and behavioral changes that can facilitate a considerable reduction in disease transmissibility.”

A 2021 systematic review of 26 studies in BMJ Global Health found “a high level of agreement” that domestic travel restrictions in China “led to important changes in the dynamics of the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Based on 13 studies of international restrictions, the authors concluded that limits on flights to and from China “may have led to additional reductions in the number of exported cases.”

A 2021 BMC Public Health study based on data from Hong Kong concluded that “complete border closure”—a far cry from the current U.S. policy, but similar to what Morocco is now doing—“remained an effective measure” to reduce cases and deaths “even in the presence of established local transmission.” Another studypublished this year in the same journal focused on Australia, which closed its borders to all nonresidents on March 20, 2020. “While travel bans lowered the number of COVID-19 importations overall,” the researchers concluded, “the effectiveness of bans on individual countries varies widely and directly depends on the change in behaviour in returning residents and citizens.”

Yet the southern border remains open with another caravan headed to the US border.

1 Like

I’m terrified at what he might attempt… Germany is starving the unvaccinated.


They can do what ever they want to the unvaccinated.

1 Like

Government is out of control

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s weaponized committee on Jan. 6, 2020 has subpoenaed phone records from private citizens, say Republicans familiar with the investigation.

“That committee has moved forward with issuing subpoenas to telephone companies,” a Republican aide told The Federalist. “Our understanding at this point is they have not subpoenaed member information, but they are subpoenaing telephone records of private American citizens.”


You are such a dumbass! I make sure to quit reading anything you post on this subject matter because clearly you are clueless on this!

So who then is tracking the 45,000,000 ILLEGALS ? Biden has $ 5,000,000,000 to spend bring in more and dumping them off in major cities across America .

Get over yourself.

Topics are posted for information and possible intelligent comments which your comment clearly isn’t.

Grouping information into a generic catch all topic isn’t beneficial if it’s a long running issue like COVID which will be with us for decades or is it about you controlling information on this site?

Are you the new moderator?

1 Like

Oh fk off! Its not about information, its about feeding your ego here. We already have threads created on this particular subject matter but for some reason you have this penchant need to keep creating threads on it because you need attention!

Speaking of intelligent comments is pretty funny coming from you, who loves posting the fear mongering bullshit but can’t engage in conversations here yourself!

And no I am not the moderator I respect the rules here unlike you who has to write a fking book every time you create a post here. No wonder why no one reads your shitty posts here, you are too much of a dumb ass to know the difference of copy and pasting articles and actually writing something with your own words! Now fk off!

Get that ammo ready for use ! :face_with_head_bandage:

Got it, you’re a control freak and be in control of every topic.

And I wouldn’t expect you to read any article with more that 3 sentences.

And I don’t write the articles, I gather them for various sources as many people don’t have the time to read.

And will leave this site and you can claim one more victory and on day you will b the last moron standing.

Oh fk off loser! I don’t copy and paste shit of entire articles and hope people are going to read it
I actually write in my own words what an article is. The meaning of an OP is? Duh! Instead you choose to post entire articles here such as what you seem to love to do and then duplicate threads because your too lazy to read what is already here! Furthermore being purposely obtuse about your interactions because you are incapable of having meaningful discussions is on you not me, that is what people come here for, to discuss topics. You on the other are only interested in feeding your own sense of narcissism. Yes the fact you mention the word “Control” is definitely projection on your part and is why you do what you do here! Don’t even fking deny it, I know who you are, you just can’t admit yourself!

It’s far too late now to worry about the China virus and all of the strains . We are letting millions into the Country unvetted , unvaxed , with diseases we haven seen in a 100 years . What exactly is the point of locking down the Country’s citizens but let millions come into the Country unchecked ?

1 Like

Under new rules announced by the White House, vaccinated people who have had a negative test in the 72 hours before travelling will be allowed to enter.

The move marks the end of the tough restrictions that have been imposed on travellers since early last year.

“This policy is guided by public health, stringent and consistent,” a White House spokesman said.

The new rules will apply to Schengen countries - a group of 26 European nations - as well as the UK, Brazil, China, India, Iran, Ireland, and South Africa.

The current rules bar entry to most non-US citizens who have been in the UK, China, India, South Africa, Iran, Brazil or a number of European countries within the last 14 days.

However, the policy has caused controversy, as passengers from 150 other countries, many of whom have struggled with high rates of Covid infection, have continued to enter the US freely.

Officials announced that people who have been jabbed with one of the vaccines that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or have been granted an Emergency Use Listing from the World Health Organization (WHO) will qualify under the system.
But we still ignore ALL the illegals ALLOWED to enter illegally untested and unvaccinated ! I hope they flood every dem City in the USA . Less dems fairer elections .