Just as Kari Lake hinted earlier that her lawsuit would be filed on Friday challenging the election results of Nov 8th in the State of Arizona. On the same day Abe Hamadeh filed a similar suit who is looking to become the states AG on the grounds that he is the rightful winner.
I guess with a corrupt judicial system having hope that anything is going to be done to prosecute the criminals is less than favorable odds. It will be interesting to see if they can actually prove with evidence that voter fraud occurred.
Pollster Rich Baris testified Thursday at Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake’s election challenge trial that the level of voter suppression that occurred on Election Day in Maricopa County last month was enough to deny Lake the victory.
Baris told the court that his firm Big Data Poll conducted exit polling in the Nov. 8 election and found a surprising 20 percent disparity in the response rates of those who used a mail-in ballot versus those who voted on Election Day.
No doubt! Its whats called an apathetic public. Drunk on consumerism will do that! Same thing happened to Athens, as complacency set in after years of prosperity then fall of Athens followed.
During day 2 of the Kari Lake election trial in Phoenix, Arizona, Maricopa County attorney Tom Liddy argued that it was “political malpractice” for a campaign to tell voters to vote in person on election day instead of voting early, and that “you reap what you sow,” meaning that Lake’s campaign lost because of strategy, not because of a printer malfunction error that rendered the ballots incapable of being machine read, long lines that led to voters being unable to vote, or other malignantly incompetent actions on behalf of Maricopa County officials.
Then they complain when ballots do not arrive on time and demand to extend counting.
Not sure what to make of this verdict considering the source, and more will have to be read into this to know exactly what happened here. Based on lack of evidence was the ruling.
An appeal is to be filed after reading this analysis all I can say is that the judge is purposely playing dumb. A lot of missed contradictions on the judge’s part.
