Dems now openly push to pack the SCOTUS

That will take a constitutional amendment

No. The number of Justices is set by ordinary statute and not by the Constitution.

1 Like

Bingo, exactly what he should do, get them on record opposing it if it happens while republicans are in control of the Senate and President.

2 Likes

The left wouldn’t care. The ends justify the means, as long as it’s their ends we’re talking about. :roll_eyes:

If it takes a few more heart attacks, pillows and summary rulings by coroners to get what they want the DNC is ready to go.

Pretty much. I just think making them go on the record against it would set up a softball question in a debate. :smiley:

Interesting that you consider that unsubstantiated:

  1. Some of the Dem. Pres. candidates (DPC’s for short) openly advocate closing down ICE; some, including Betoff O’Rourke, want to tear down any border barriers- why but to import millions of ‘undocumented’
  2. Some DPC’s want to bring the millions or undocumented out of the shadows, to be full partners in this American experience Vota Aqui!
  3. Nancy Pelosi openly stated she wants the voting age lowered to 16! They know a teen functions on ‘what can I get?’ and sex- that’s it. They know pandering will work brilliantly on the undeveloped prefrontal cortex (while the PFC doesn’t fully mature until about 25, if you’re old enough to die for the country, you’re old enough to vote).
    How to do this? Pack the SCOTUS with ‘true believers’ through expansion; end the electoral college so that four cities control election results. When you can by fiat of virtue signaling, legalize ten to thirty million border hoppers, you have an unbreakable plurality.
    One more example of Dem’s duplicity - Reparations. Dems are suddenly pushing for this because Black votes for the GOP rose to 10% in 2016. With record low unemployment among African Americans, Dems want to make sure to divert attention form the good and ‘keep hate alive!’ Again you only want it because a check will come to your house.
    If anything, Zantax soft-pedals the issue.
1 Like

What is this proof of? Can you provide a link with Dem candidates being quoted as wanting to abolish ice?

If you are referencing amenesty, then yes. But this isn’t importing votes… when the people are already here.

Again this isn’t importing votes. Plus it would never happen. Nor do I want this to happen.

SCOTUS packing won’t happen… the electoral college thing has momentum but it won’t happen due to having to change the constitution. And if it happens 4 cities will not control elections. 1 person 1 vote.

Dems don’t need the reparations issue to maintain the black vote… they still get 90%+ percent. Dems aren’t worried about that.

1 Like

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/394766-gillibrand-calls-to-eliminate-ice-get-rid-of-it-start-over

It is effectively the same thing and you know it.

But the fact is, you will vote Dem no matter what, and this is part of their platform, so you will in effect, be voting for it.

Easy to claim, but it ‘polls well with Democrats’ so whether you approve or not, like lowering the voting age- it will happen. Again, any electoral map you care to look at will show you that a handful of cities produce more votes than vast swaths of the rest of the nation. It is in effect tyranny of the majority.

I disagree; Dems are willing to risk alienating large numbers of White voters (see taxpayers) to ensure the portion of the Black populace that is either just fine with a scheme- as long as they get free money, and/or lives for self pity and externalization of blame for failure - will go to the polls and vote Dem. The idea has a shocking popularity with millennials who are incapable of understanding that THEY will actually end up paying for this vast guilting robbery.

Agreed. A wall would be a swell bonus too.