Just so you know, there are CONSERVATIVE arguments against degeneracy, as well…
Why are all these ■■■■■■■ arguing from full-on LEFTIST, FEMINIST positions and calling themselves “conservatives”?
What a bunch of goddamned simpletons…
What’s the problem with what Banks is saying? What Banks is proposing is conservative and anti-porn/anti-degradation. What am I missing here?
1 Like
He’s using the feminist argument that porn leads to rape and rough sex and should be banned because it reinforces patriarchy.
I’m not going to shill for the pornography industry, but these are losing propositions, at least the pro-feminist approach is. We tried this with the rapefugees in 2015-2016 and go look at the male-female vote split for pro-rapefugee politicians in 2016-2018.
RadFems will just argue that it’s “empowering” for women to let some rootless cosmopolitan pay her a couple thousand shekels to get jizzed on her face for millions of people to see online. And that restricting it is “men attempting to control their bodies.” They already have:
1 Like
Feminists are exclusively women who hate us and want to destroy us by any means necessary.
There’s no logic - they just intentionally do whatever we hate.
They don’t even want to fuck refugees - they just want to humiliate us because they hate us.
Because a controlling tribe used television to convince them we were bad.
Not sure about that. He’s saying its degenerate, implying it leads to unnecessary violence and degradation towards women, among other things. That is pretty much a normie paleocon talking point about porn since like forever.
Hopefully you’re right. I could get on board with a Trump crackdown on all pornography.
Most people in the Republican party will completely cuck themselves to appease the left.
