If people on the Left can do whatever they want within the law, why are people on the Right constantly threatening civil war over having different ideas that are within the law and Constitution? The Right can puff up their chest all they want, but they were losers last time. Maybe they shouldn’t rush into a war they already lost once.
Now to be a little more rational, maybe instead of some on the Right threatening to kill people who disagree with them through civil war, how about convincing those that disagree with them that their stances are the best. There are reasons that the people who disagree do disagree. President Trump has already made great in roads by talking rather than threatening. I guarantee he wouldn’t have convinced anybody by threatening civil war.
There is an immovable framework in our country, to which the “change” you speak of is not acceptable because we are the United States. I would respect you if you acknowledged that Socialism is not part of the American identity, but elements of socialism have been integrated exclusively to offset social and economic tragedy.
I don’t have a problem conceding that our country utilize humanitarian efforts to offset tragedy even when the methods utilize some TEMPORARY socialist ideology. For example, I would have supported some degree of affirmative action in the past. Now?!? At some point you cannot enable race or gender to be convoluted with failure, sometimes people of color fail and their competition is white.
Does anyone look at the vastly disproportionate number of athletes who are of color to our population and claim that the NFL, NBA or MLB are racist against whites? No, it just so happens that more people of color seem to be better at athletics because the evidence shows the disproportion.
Do liberals view crime or professional employment the same way? No, which enables mentalities across diverse populations of people to culturally segment themselves and make poor/lawless behavior an integral part of their identity. Then they blame a racially segmented part of the population for the bad choices of a significant portion due to lies and ideologies you all exploit for political power.
How about the left stop enabling lawlessness and accept certain truths of history that no one in the present is accountable for. How about acknowledge that the United States was an idea before it actualized to the point of Civil War which led to a cataclysmic global change to the treatment of people. Slavery was an integral part of society until the United States abolished it for the world!
Yet, here we are today with educational psychopaths butchering history to paint the United States as the sole perpetrator of slavery, beholden to reparations?
You may be suprised that I am a pretty moderate conservative, but I will not tolerate blatant discrimination or the redistribution of wealth from any segment of society to another just because a current scholar says its fair. My immigrant great-grandparents left RussIa to avoid socialist Stalin from being executed as ■■■■■ The ■■■■ are more likely understanding of what isolation looks like. It wasn’t right to discriminate them in Germany, Jim Crow wasn’t right in the United States and turning on white people now in the United States for being white and presuming narrow-minded generalities to steal from anyone is a contradiction of the cause.
The passive aggressive behavior of your party will lead to violence if it maintains extremism. Realize that we are all people and the goal is equal opportunity through meritocracy and Capitalism is king then we can discuss provisions.
As I stated, I am predicting an outcome of continuous behavior, not threatening an outcome. The left needs to be cognizant of the consequences of unraveling the foundational fabric of our country.
Thanks for your permission to do what I want within the law. Now, can you answer the question instead of deflecting? Why are people on the Right constantly threatening people on the Left with killing them through civil war for doing what they want within the law?
You don’t need my permission. The law is the law as I stated. I have no issue with anything someone does if it is within the confines of the law, and may I add decency to other human beings.
I wouldn’t know. I haven’t heard anyone say they want to kill people through civil war for doing what they want within the law.
However, if you look at what the politicians are doing with the 2nd amendment in Virginia, you will see people ready to fight be it via a civil war to protect their rights.
The United States government is “We the People”. The control of means of production by the People is Capitalism under the Constitution. The United States government’s reach into production by elected officials inherently oversteps the authority the People grant their representatives.
Lincoln was a Republican. The KKK started the Democratic party. The party of letting people make their own decisions with limited government interference in daily affairs is not the same as the one who always wants to control behavior. Conservative and liberal happen to be relative to the political station of government. So, the Republicans were liberal in their origins relative to conservative slavery. I would have been liberal then. Until the 21st century, the pendulum swung in the opposite direction. Now it has swung too far left.
Relativism is hard to understand for a lot of people. I would have been left of slavery and I am right of Communism. The pendulum is swinging equal, opposite extreme of slavery. And if you’re to the left of the political establishment now, you support the same kind of oppression.
Much of what the left proposes to accomplish is NOT within our Constitution. Things such as gun confiscation and abolishing the Electoral College are definitely not.
Lack of due process in impeaching a President amounts to ignoring the Constitution. The Democrat Party has set a limbo bar for impeachment of future Presidents.
Sanctuaries that refuse to adhere to US immigration laws ignore the Constitution.
Arranging for illegal aliens to vote ignores the Constitution.
Refusing to accept the results of a Presidential election ignores the Constitution.
You might try encouraging the clan of atheists to which you belong to do the same rather than seeking legislation to deny religions the right to express themselves in public.
BTW, only butthurt snowflakes get triggered by the sight of a cross on public property.
I could go on, but I need to rearrange my sock drawer.
Yes you are presuming on what I think let alone judging from a small sample size. What makes you think I agree with everything the right says? You are trying to over simplify my statements and label them as tribal which they are not. Let’s just agree to disagree on this point as I don’t think we will agree on this issue. Next.
It really is about those on the Left not just threatening but actively working to kill, outside the boundaries of our Constitution, while claiming it is legal.
NYC, for example, had to walk it back knowing full well their gun control legislation would be struck down by the Supreme Court.
Had no one challenged it? Well, that would be a sad day.
The liberals would like nothing more than for people not to challenge. They are right; you are wrong, despite evidence of the opposite.
Dude, this country was not the same in 1820 that it was in 1787 when the original colonies produced the constitution. We were a snot nosed, back country, primitive adolescent that Europeans mocked because we built everything out of wood that had a 100 year shelf life…
Nor were we the same in 1864 that we were in 1820. Americans continued to demand more of their government and the government expanded to accommodate. Social programs, services and provisions expanded according to demand. By the 1930’s FDR, the conservatives nemesis was delivering amazing socialistic reforms that conservatives bitch about to this day. But tell me what FDR gave us that conservatives have taken away???
George Bush rode into Washington on a horse of a smaller government and rode out having presided over the largest government expansion in decades…
Get use to it. America changes, will continue to change, will always change and it doesn’t even hear your bitching about it…
You know with Pelousi in charge I wouldn’t put it past them.
Problem is, Pelousi probably won’t be in charge in Dec of 2020 after the new congress is seated and inevitably such an underhanded attempt would be landed at the steps of the SCOTUS.
“The Squad” drove Pelosi to force an impeachment vote when she knew it was political suicide and they’ve been dictating the agenda since taking office.
