Clinton: Sanders and supporters did not do enough to unify party in 2016

She peddles a lie once again.

Bernie Sanders literally did more for Hillary than Hillary did for Obama.

He did more campaigning and events for her and endorsed her even though she was a corporate shill.

Despite the fact that 74.3% of Bernie supporters came out and voted for Hillary in 2016, despite Bernie doing 39 rallies for her in 13 different states, which is more rallies than Hillary did for Obama only doing 13, her entitled bratty self once again attacks us for it.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton accused Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and his supporters of not doing enough to unify the party behind her White House bid in 2016 and said that their behavior affected the general election.

“All the way up until the end, a lot of people highly identified with his campaign were urging people to vote third party, urging people not to vote,” she said in an interview on the podcast “Your Primary Playlist.”

“It had an impact.”

Clinton accused Sanders’s supporters of drawing out the nominating contest by refusing to come around to her presidential campaign all the way through to the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/480990-clinton-sanders-and-supporters-did-not-do-enough-to-unify-party-in-2016

1 Like

The Democratic party is a leftist party of barely patriotic socialists who only speak of religion or patriotic duty when it suits their treasonous agendas.

1 Like

Yeah, I’m aware, Hillary is a liar.

Dems aren’t socialist, republicans are just blind.

1 Like

Republicans are part of the same issue.

Virginia only went blue because Republicans were too lazy to run in several voting districts.

1 Like

Very few dems are socialist. There’s not even ten in the house rn that don’t accept corporate donations iirc

1 Like

I just don’t see Michael Bloomberg with his antigun agenda shedding his executive protection detail which definitely has automatic weapons.

2 Likes

No just the ones who call themselves “Progressives”.

All this OP does is illuminate what we already knew about Hillary, and she simply can’t accept the election results because she feels she is entitled to the white house despite the fact she has zero accomplishments both as a senator of NY and SOS. She is all about playing the blame game without accepting any responsibility for the biggest election loss in US history. Blaming Sanders is just part of her blame game rhetoric.

1 Like

Being socialist doesn’t mean donations will be refused. Socialists thrive on OPM (Other People’s Money).

2 Likes

That is a common hypocrisy among rich advocates of disarming the public.

Socialists and communists among other things share a love of money and an inability to live by their own standards. That’s why I made the Bloomberg reference but just realized now I didn’t explain it very early.

Capitalists do that, you’re confused @BagelChaser

1 Like

Bloomberg isn’t winning shit. Although he is rising in polls.

@infinite Capitalists are honest about their love of money. Communists and socialists are hypocrites.

1 Like

@BeatGuts Even if he loses the presidency, he owns Virginia

I disagree @BagelChaser…but let’s not detail.

1 Like
1 Like

Just because candidates gets more donations doesn’t mean they are more popular. For example nobody is donating money to Michael Bloomberg, since he’s one of the richest men in the world and a self-funder.

@PISSEDOFF individual donations are still a good indicator though of general popularity nationally. Obviously it wouldn’t translate to an electoral win in itself, but it’s a good sign.

1 Like

If Trump really has dirt on Hillary can he please share it?

Please I want her gone too.

Just so she shuts up.

Hillary’s narcissism is fucking annoying.