Can a nation survive being ignorant of its past?

Americans Are Ignorant of Their History and Principles

According to a recent survey by the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, most Americans would fail a basic citizenship test.

Axios published a roundup of how participants performed. The results weren’t good:

People did relatively well on the most basic questions. Seven out of 10 knew that Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence and that Franklin Roosevelt was president during World War II.
But only 43 percent knew** that Woodrow Wilson was president during World War I (nearly one out of four thought it was Roosevelt), and only 56 percent knew which countries the U.S. fought in World War II.

Fewer than a third could correctly name three of the original 13 states.

More than six out of 10 incorrectly thought the Constitution was written in 1776. (It wasn’t written until 1787.)

Nearly four out of 10 thought Benjamin Franklin invented the light bulb.

Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., had the right response:

For sure, immigrants have some advantages in taking this test over native-born Americans. After all, they are likely studying to pass it as their citizenship depends on it.

There are, of course, plenty of other important aspects of citizenship besides knowing history. Even more important are the very ethos and ideas that ground our founding documents: the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

It’s probably more consequential for our country, for instance, that the average citizen believes these documents to be fundamentally good, even if they don’t know what year they were written.

But the bottom line is this: Being ignorant of the past has real-world effects. It is inexcusable for Americans as a whole to be unaware of our past and the basic principles of our system of government.

Undermining the Republic

It’s all the more concerning given our celebration of “democracy.” Some, like former President Barack Obama, have even proposed mandating that all Americans vote.

Given the decline of America’s historic and civic knowledge, perhaps we should consider how we ended up here.

Is it not concerning that as knowledge of our system deteriorates, more Americans are being called upon to partake in that system by voting? Does that not flatly contradict the idea that democracy is the highest good?

That’s certainly the idea being pushed by those who want to abolish the Electoral College.

Given the decline of America’s historic and civic knowledge, perhaps we should consider how we ended up here.

Last October, I covered the results of an equally depressing survey, and my conclusion was the same then as it is now:

As citizens, knowledge of the past and of civics is crucial. Lacking such knowledge is unhealthy for a free country, and even dangerous, given how bad political life can become.

One of our biggest problems today is that we often focus on tearing down our history rather than learning from it. That needs to change.

If these sobering test results tell us anything, it’s that we need to consider a fundamental change in how we approach education in the United States. And despite what some voices say, education funding is not the problem.

The U.S. ranks, globally, near the top in spending on elementary and secondary education, yet we don’t appear to be getting much bang for the buck. Perhaps it’s time we take a harder look at the public school monopoly that’s failing students and leaving generations of Americans without a basic understanding of our past.

More generally, we’ve failed to uphold Ronald Reagan’s call for an informed patriotism and more civic ritual—necessary qualities for the maintenance of a free country—in favor of negative and ideologically narrow accounts of America’s past now en vogue in our schools.

This is a recipe for a dark future and needs to change.

We need to fix this, for the sake of our republic.

liberal Americans are ignorant of their history

Its sad too, Ask the first 5 kids you see and ask them to name the last 3 V.P’s and they will be scratching their heads , then head up to Canada and talk to the first 5 kids and not only they can tell you who was V.P they will tell you which party.

I found when I was in Denmark last year people knew who was President and V.P

But ask the American libs snowflakes to name all of Jersey shore cast and the Kardashians and they will nail it to a tee

1 Like

If you look at the map, the states that did the poorest on the test are all ruby red.

https://www.axios.com/happy-presidents-day-history-is-hard-8dbed5a2-07f6-43f4-bfab-0836597bfba8.html

One state did well, and it figures Bernie represents that state .

Liberalism educates its kind well in the system it would have them subvert, it seems.

If you look at the map, a complete failure as a country.

Get it? It’s not state related although it would make you feel superior, most states produced failures as future citizens.

Your comment is best directed at max-webster, who specifically called out liberal Americans, which is what I was responding to in the first place.

I’m glad we agree that most states, blue and red, have done a poor job educating their citizens.

Or better, (in the spirit of individual responsibility) most citizens, liberal and conservative, have done a poor job educating themselves.

If these sobering test results tell us anything, it’s that we need to consider a fundamental change in how we approach education in the United States. And despite what some voices say, education funding is not the problem.

The U.S. ranks, globally, near the top in spending on elementary and secondary education, yet we don’t appear to be getting much bang for the buck. Perhaps it’s time we take a harder look at the public school monopoly that’s failing students and leaving generations of Americans without a basic understanding of our past.

In tandem with that, perhaps we should also take a look at where parents are failing in terms of their own contributions to their children’s education (too many leave it entirely up to the state), and American citizens themselves in terms of how they should continue to grow intellectually long after their formal educations have ended.

In short, a shift in societal attitude where intellectualism isn’t viewed with contempt and suspicion but embraced, and where critical thinking is a highly valued character trait. Our current preference for emotion, tribalism, and irrationality plays right into the hands of institutionalized powers.

You nailed it, people do not work with their children. They don’t work with them to ensure they have the concepts that are taught.

Missing is the parental involvement in determining what will be taught. Today a government class isn’t required for graduation HS, hence the lack of understanding our government today. Few have the basics of history. Few have solid mathematic concepts.
An example, my daughter took pre calc in HS. She barely got by. In her freshmen year Calculus was a required class. She aced it, no problem. I asked her why she had such difficulty in pre calc, she said the instructor never explained the the problems and how to work through the solution.

The difference between a HS teacher who could care less an a university professor that was there to ensure the students success if they wanted to succeed.

It can, but not for long and not as envisioned.

If nothing else when we cease being a Constitutional Republic where both individuals and states are represented the “majority” concentrated in the nations cities will eat the rest by voting themselves other people’s money.

That process is underway with the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact…

It eliminates presidential vote for smaller states.

Yep, and look at the states who have already approved it in some form. They are making themselves irrelevant.

“I believe the consensus” is neither intellectualism nor critical thinking.

What consensus in particular are you speaking to?

The world is ending… and you ask that question? My god, man!

Donald saved us from that.

AOC can’t save us from anything, we are MAGAnificent now.

And the CEC chose Trump. He is their darling and can do no wrong.

Or is there a difference?