California Passes Law to Require Background Checks for Ammo

On the battlefield, you have the option of defending yourself, firing back. A Bald Eagle has more right to life under the law than an unborn human. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now remember, just a bunch of cells. [

The Grantham Collection Abortion Instruments Archive

www.abortioninstruments.com/new_index.htmlimage
](http://www.abortioninstruments.com/new_index.html) FULL TERM HAND WITH DEFENSIVE WOUNDS. God forgive us.

You don’t want to bear the slightest expense of taking care of the 60 million unwanted that have been aborted, just sense RvW.

Whatever. But you do agree the above photo is a murdered child, correct. I stepped up to raise my grandchildren. I didn’t have to. So two of those 60 million I saved; and did it with a happy heart.

2 Likes

Anyone ever hear of that newfangled birth control stuff? Well, it’s out there.

1 Like

I can’t speak to the authenticity of a photo, but late term abortion is VERY rare and typically happens for the health and life of the mother.

Otherwise, if you’re telling me that your child/children were prepared to have abortions and you stepped in and offered to raise the children if they went ahead and delivered them instead, and then you raised them, then god bless go forward, I’m proud of you Jim!!

As if abortion is the only alternative to starving babies dying in the streets.

What a completely dishonest argument.

Late or early, there is only one degree of death.

I wouldn’t give a damn what you or anyone else says, including a Supreme Court, if my wife’s life were on the line, we’re making our OWN choice. As I’ve pointed out repeatedly, everybody’s about liberty and choice until they aren’t…:roll_eyes:

State and local jurisdiction only.
We have many rules about what we can do with our bodies.

Is there any state where abortion is illegal in the event that the unborn child is jeopardizing the woman’s life? Or are you just posting a red herring?

I don’t bear the responsibility of caring for about 300 million other people either but I oppose executing the innocent among them. You don’t?

1 Like

Every birth jeopardizes a woman’s health. But women are designed to give birth; so complications are very rare. So we have cesarean deliveries for in question pregnancies. Much more often than not, an abortion is simply a depraved convenience. Can we at least be honest?

1 Like

Something like 90-95% of abortions are simply about convenience. The “life and health of the mother” is for the most part a lie.

Killing your unborn child because it’s not convenient is the ultimate abdication of personal responsibility and consequences for your actions.

Unfortunately women are rarely if ever warned about the lifelong consequences of having to live with that decision.

1 Like

Mental health and abortion: review and analysis.

Ney PG, Wickett AR.

Abstract

This survey of studies which relate to the emotional sequelae of induced abortion, draws attention to the need for more long-term, in-depth prospective studies. The literature to this point finds no psychiatric indications for abortion, and no satisfactory evidence that abortion improves the psychological state of those not mentally ill; abortion is contra-indicated when psychiatric disease is present, as mental ill-health has been shown to be worsened by abortion. Recent studies are turning up an alarming rate of post-abortion complications such as P.I.D., and subsequent infertility. The emotional impact of these complications needs to be studied. Other considerations looked at are the long-term demographic implications of abortion on demand and the effect on the medical professions.

PIP:

The majority of abortions performed today are due to social or psychological reasons. In the 1950’s, 50% of all abortions were justified for psychiatric reasons; that figure today is closer to 95%. The reasons for therapeutic abortion cannot justify the psychological trauma that mentally unstable women go through after an abortion; data available today supports this theory. There have been a number of studies that have tried to prove that abortion is not harmful to a woman’s state of mind. However, the flaws of these studies include: the lack of controlled studies where abortions are randomized as a treatment for pregnancy; not taking into account the woman’s state of mind before the pregnancy; use of questionnaires to gain information on well-suppressed feelings; and few studies with comparison groups. It has also been discovered that women who had elective abortions suffered higher psychological trauma than women who gave birth to stillborn children. However, emotional distress was found to be higher among women that had repeat abortions. In other studies, it was found that women who had previous abortions and were looking forward to being pregnant were more anxious about the pregnancy than women who had never had abortions. Recent studies on women that have had abortions show that they run a greater risk of complications such as: eclampsia, bleeding, miscarriage, maternal mortality and post-partum complications. Past abortions may also have an effect on the relationship which exists between the mother and surviving children. Some studies have also discovered feelings of shame and uneasiness in medical personnel who conduct abortions. Factors such as amniocentesis, eugenics and demography figure prominently in the prevalence of abortions.

Comment in

And so are late term abortions because of it. So you don’t need to keep posting your pictures as though they are representative. The same people who pretend to care about innocent life are on board with all our gratuitous wars and the killing of actually living breathing humans. Even the targeting of innocent civilians in large cities because there’s a gunstock manufacturer nearby and “justifying” it as a military target.

Good thing the fairy tale god so many believe in is just a myth or there would be weeping and gnashing of teeth…:roll_eyes:

That’s the biggest load of crap I’ve ever heard. Late term abortion is NEVER necessary to protect the mothers life. How do we know? The baby will have to come out through c-section, alive or dead. There’s a big difference between forced early delivery that is risky to the child and a deliberate abortion. Just another lie the left tells to justify disgusting behavior.

https://www.liveaction.org/news/abortion-life-health-mother/

That’s exactly right. They try to lump abortion into the discussion to pretend it’s necessary. I haven’t seen a single example of where it would be necessary to execute a healthy baby to save the mother. Deliver it at risk? Of course. . . but the goal is to treat two patients and sometimes they unfortunately lose one.

Yet another pathetic argument made by the left. If you won’t pay for it, you must agree with them and allow the abortion… as if that was the only two options. Framing the debate. Your statement is dead on accurate. I don’t want to pay for my neighbor’s house payment either but I’d take exception (probably violent) to it if you try to kill her. I love your argument.

Wrong. According to the CDC, it is.

Late-term abortions usually take place when the mother’s health is at serious risk or when fatal abnormalities have been detected.[4] These anomalies may include anencephaly or limb-body wall complex were death generally occurs around the time of birth regardless.[5] Health conditions in the mother that may be reasons include preeclampsia and placenta accreta.[5] The risk of a mother’s death following a surgical abortion after 20 weeks is less than that of typical childbirth at term in the United States.[6]

Fun how all of your links go to wiki and you quote the CDC… which says NOTHING on the subject in your link… and HERE is the link you copied this crap from… not the damn CDC… another lying liberal. Oh wait, did I just insult you again? Nope. Told the truth… you misrepresented a source as coming from the CDC when it came from WIKI because you understand that WIKI isn’t a factual source.

but maybe you can explain it since you’re the expert…

Why would it be necessary to kill a baby prior to c-section where the life of the mother is threatened? Is it possible the baby will be lost? Of course… is it REQUIRED to kill it before delivering it? Of course not. It’s just another lie told by the left so they can use a few abortions to justify hundreds of thousands.