No it’s not, and when I post something from a Russian news source, you criticize it as well. I guess your the only one that knows the “true” news source….
You’ll have to do better……
Only a couple of names, if you’re still interested.
All very interesting but am I wrong or is it not a fact that Russian troops invaded Ukraine?
Did the Azov battalion invade Russia?
Or, are the nationalists defending their own country.
Slotkin (cia), Rose, The Nation, aljazeera, Washington Post.
Do we see a pattern here?
The Ukrainian constitution forbids presence of foreign troops in Ukraine. Nonetheless, it is a fact that NATO personnel (instructors, soldiers, call them what you like), hostile to Russia, were present in Ukraine by the thousands, training Ukrainians how to use the newfangled weapons.
Russia had no choice.
No, but they have killed at least 14,000 ethnic Russian civilians, many of whom are now Russian citizens since 2014. And the Kiev regime has not honored any part of the Minsk Accord which they signed.
Presence of mercenaries from the US, Canada, UK and African states has been confirmed fighting alongside the Azov.
Israel was instrumental in installing the current Kiev regime in 2014.
Russia used the country of Belarus to stage and support over a hundred thousand troops for Christ sake.
So you invade and level an entire country because they have ongoing military training.
Belarus is not participating in this campaign.
Poland tried to send in troops to Ukraine, but other NATO states told Poland: Do it on your own, we are not supporting you.
At this very moment Russian troop’s are resupplying and reorganizing in Belarus. I guess that is not participating.
When the Neocon-run administration / NATO invaded a sovereign foreign country, be it Serbia, Iraq, Libya, they bombed dams, bridges, residential area and destroys the infrastructure and civilians got killed or had no water, food, electricity and gas.
When Russia “invaded” Ukraine, Russia minimized civilian casualties, keeping the infrastructure intact (unless blown up by the Azov), and civilians could freely move about (unless they were kept hostage or shot in the back by the Azov).
It is Russia that is delivering food, water, medicaments and clothes to survivors of Mariupol and elsewhere, not the Azov.
Survivors of Mariupol say virtually unanimously that it was Azov who destroyed the apartment buildings and houses.
1 Like
I guess that’s not participating either.
1 Like
Ukraine was/is the second home to leading Dems; their source of questionable money.
Trump may not have given Putin a go-ahead, but their interests match. (At this moment Trump is not officially supporting Putin, because the left-wing hysteria against Russia is too great.)
Remember with all the Russia, Russia, Russia conspiracy nonsense during Trump’s presidency and the infamous phone call that led to his impeachment? Or that beta cuck Vindman who fabricated under oath about that phone call to Zelensky? How about the accusation’s prior to that shameful theater with the Russian collusion narrative based on a phony document known as the Steel Dossier that led to the Mueller Report which essentially wasted 40+ million dollars of US tax payers money? Then there was Adam Schiff even lied about having irrefutable proof that Trump colluded with the Russians, yet to this date no one has held him accountable as he still enjoys a security clearance and currently a sitting congressmen. Fusion GPS and Glen Simpson taking the 5th? There is much more to this list that I probably would be here all day writing a dissertation of just how many were in on the biggest hoax ever perpetuated on a duly elected sitting president of our life time.
What was the motive?
Trump and his people at ODNI, NSA, and the State department were engaged in a clandestine war involving “White hats vs. Black hats” (“Black hats” being Obama’s leftover minions) were zeroing in and over the target of dark (Deep State) money operatives whose revenues BTW was coming from drug sales from poppy fields in Afghanistan (CIA using such money in order to not have any accounting of money paid, nor of their operations) were all connected to the Muslim Brotherhood operations being set up through out the middle east during Obama’s presidency. (see also why Philip Haney was killed) This of course goes back to Hillary when she was at the state department and the tragic fiasco that happened in Benghazi that saw a US ambassador and three other Americans being killed. To date, no one was held accountable for that crime either. During Trump’s presidency, his administration was in the process of getting rid of these Dark operative sites to which Ukraine was the proxy state and HQ for both money laundering operations as well as spying on Russian interests connected to Oligarchs within the OIL sectors. Trump threatened all of this and is why they moved mountains to rig an election and tried every way possible to remove him from office including spying and impeachment. Is it no wonder that they are at it again now that he is not president and now trying to distract everyone with another phony Jan 6 committee, or the fact they even went so far to try and pass a law federalizing our elections in order to insure Trump or anyone else for that matter ever gets elected again? Of course they failed in that effort but with everything else they are doing in order to try to destroy the country and create as much chaos as possible because they know the dam is about to break.
2 Likes
Why don’t you go look up the Azov Battalion via your favorite trusty news source Dollar, you’ll find the same. They are who they are……
So you see no significance to Russia’s national security impacted by the Obama administrations coup in Kiev in 2014 installing an anti Russian puppet regime……
1 Like
Sorry, but the right wing hysteria against Russia/Putin in America is as high or higher than the lefts….
Regarding the coverage of the Russian/Ukrainian war, there is little difference between Fox and CNN. And right winger Lindsey Graham supports the notion of assassination of Putin….