Anne Frank's diary: hoax

Get the picture?

Get the picture?

1 Like

What about all of those Rabbis raping all of those young boys?

1 Like

And now jealousy rears its ugly head.

1 Like

Is that what you’re jealous about?
Looks like it, O sinful one.

Maybe you need a new religion which doesn’t insult Muslims.

Maybe Muslims need to be tolerant of others. Their godforsaken theocracy is sworn to kill all others.

Screw ISLAM!

2 Likes

And once again this was thoroughly disproven with the forensic examination of the Diary.

Apparently you don’t. The message is to kill all of the ■■■■ which is who she is confronting.

If nothing else gave you a clue the direction she’s facing and the green paint should have.

Ha?
Sexual rubbish written with a ball-point pen, in adult handwriting to boot, is an authentic diary by a 12-year old girl of 1940s?

Yet another complete fabrication on your part. Congrats. The diary was not written in BP P as was proven during the forensic investigation. Links posted long ago.

BTW, the BPP was invented in 1888, improved and perfected in the 20’s and 30’s and began being mass produced and sold in Europe around 1940.

This issue isn’t whether BP was used but what type and when, and it was conclusively proven that the fine point BP was only used later by the translator making corrections and notes.

The first working ballpoint pen was presented at Budapest International Fair in 1931. They filed for patents in France and Britain in 1938. In 1941 Bíró brothers and a their friend, Juan Jorge Meyne fled to Argentina and opened there Bíró Pens of Argentina - factory that made ballpoint pens and sold them in Argentina as “Birome”. This ballpoint pen was licensed and made in Britain as a “Biro” for RAF aircrews which used it at high altitudes ([fountain pens]

(History of Fountain Pens – Invention of Reservoir Pen) used to leak ink when used too high).

So…you think that forensics analysis was air tight?

Brain-washed shabbos goys will hear nothing.
Ball-point pens were not readily available in those days.
A 12-year old cannot produce adult handwriting

Go back to my original post

The findings were not even arguable hence the case was thrown out.

If you can show their findings to be false by all means do so.

Once again your statement is provably false and already shown to be so.

Why are there various versions?

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/08/books/an-authenticated-edition-of-anne-frank-s-diary.html

Try reading your own citation. It says nothing about multiple versions, but it does go into great detail exactly as to how the diary was authenticated and proven not to be a forgery.

You’re doing a bangup job of making a complete fool of yourself today.

Oh yeah?
How come there were translation errors from English to Dutch?
And discrepancies in the structure of the building (het achterhuis)?
If you read the “diary” at all, these people were constantly yelling and screaming, having great fun laughing, chopping wood with an ax, and they were supposed to be hiding

Through exhaustive work by both German and Dutch authorities the authencity of her diary has been proven in every way it possibly can.

You’re just showing yourself to be a hate filled fool who cannot accept the facts.

It was written with a fountain pen.

You are definitely out of your gourd.

My copy is printed in Helvetica. I suppose it must be a fake! :grin:

1 Like

“I don’t think that anyone could read ‘‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ without coming to dread the ending.”

Yeah, exposed as fake.