Angry Hillary Clinton Says Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein are Russian Assets

You more than anybody know this is a page right out the Democratic playbook! It’s good that people are able to recognise the decepticon at work!

Why Isn’t Communism as Hated as Nazism? - PragerU

1 Like

Tulsi Gabbard is a huge threat to them all. When Hillary attacks you, you’ve hit a nerve. Go Tulsi!!!:+1:

You’re damn straight she could. Poised, cool as a cucumber, articulate, not given to impulse, oh yeah, everything that Trump is not. She’d kick his ass.

Absolutely true…

Monty working overtime again! Saving up for a new chair to watch your porn in?

image

Wrong, your theory’s fail.

Gabbard was invited in to work for the Clinton campaign and when she got to the DNC and saw the dirty shit that Clinton, Brazil and Schultz were doing, she left and began supporting Sanders. Clinton has a vendetta. Gabbard slapped her chops perfectly. She embodies corruption Gabbard told her. Trump promised in his second debate with Clinton that if he was elected president she was going to prison. But then he told the truth as president elect, that he never did have any interest in prosecuting Clinton, it was all campaign rhetoric to get the vote.

image

Yep, Tulsi’s just very good…

image

I just woke up at midnight, turned on the TV and there was Hillary on Colbert’s show. Then I took some advil. I was doubtful that the Dems could be that stupid, but it’s looking more and more like she is going to give it another go.

I think that she views Gabbard as a threat to this, if the frontrunners begin folding. Now that they’ve crafted this neo-McCarthyism, it’s a weapon too tempting to use, even now being used against threats from within. Watch out Monte, you’re next.

What do you mean Smiley??? :man_shrugging:

Let’s hope you’re wrong. What did she say on Colbert that causes that conclusion?

You’ve stepped out of line, you’re now a part of the whataboutnik collective.

Sorry but still don’t know what you mean?

Btw, if Hillary did jump in again and won the party’s nomination, I’d have to vote for Trump, four more years of him or possibly eight years of her…:flushed::flushed::flushed::flushed:

It was alot of forgettable blah blah about Trump, I changed channels pretty quickly. But she seemed happier than I’ve ever seen, I think she sees how extremely vulnerable Biden and Warren are.

My guess has more to do with this Gabbard smear. Why would she do this? My only conclusion is that she’s close to jumping back in. The old smear machine is getting de-rusted.

Warrens not vulnerable, but Biden surely is.

Clinton has an axe to grind with Gabbard over the 2016 campaign when she left her for Sanders over corruption in the DNC which favored Clinton.

I guessed you missed Opinionoid’s amusing thing where he said that asking “what about Obama doing this and that” is playing into another Russian disinformation campaign, “whataboutism.”

In other words, any deviation from the current line of propaganda is being an asset of the Russians, a “whataboutnik.”

1 Like

I guess we’ll soon see. I hope I’m wrong, another campaign with Hillary plodding at the front would be like bamboo under the fingernails.

1 Like