Amber Heard Could Face 3 Years Of Imprisonment If Found Guilty Of Faking Evidence

Equal rights = equal lefts

Heard could face up to three years of imprisonment if proven guilty of manipulating evidence against Johnny Depp.

Heard and Depp’s marriage did not only end in divorce, the exes were also embroiled in a legal battle after the “Aquaman” star accused the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star of being violent and abusive.

However, Depp fired back and said that Heard “painted on bruises” to obtain a temporary restraining order (TRO) from him. Depp’s legal defense wanted to subpoena James Franco because he was seen joining Heard in a surveillance footage. He saw Heard’s face in the days and nights before and after the actress went to court with alleged bruises for a TRO on May 27.

In a different incident, Heard claimed that Depp gave her two black eyes during an argument that occurred the night before she made an appearance on “The Late Late Show with James Corden” on Dec. 16, 2015. In a court document obtained by The Blast, Heard’s celebrity stylist Samantha McMillen denied her claims because she saw the actress on those days and she didn’t have any bruises.

“Throughout the day of December 16, 2015, I could see clearly that Amber Heard did not have any visible marks, bruises, cuts, or injuries to her face or any other part of her bod,” McMillen said.

If Heard will be proven guilty of faking her bruises, she could face three years of imprisonment. According to the Wallin & Klarich Law Firm, the California Penal Code Section 141 PC stated that it is illegal to alter, modify, plant, place, conceal, manufacture or move any physical matter with the intention of causing someone to be charged with a crime. Some would face felony charges for this.

Related charges include Offering false evidence under California Penal Code 132 PC and Preparing false evidence under California Penal Code Section 134 PC which are considered felony crimes and carry a maximum sentence of up to three years. This applies even if the person doesn’t actually present it but intend to present the falsified evidence as true.

Anyone with an IQ above 75 could see that this Amber Heard woman was a worthless gold digger.

Well he’s the one who choose her.

1 Like

It is easy for a bloke with a hard on to fall in “love” with a provocative, disingenuous temptress. I personally made two consecutive bad choices based on lies made by the chosen ones. The second one attempted to murder me for money. Imagine that!

Hell hath no fury…

1 Like

I think the drug problems potentiated all of this.

Someone better warn Elon Musk…

1 Like

She’s using a multi-millionaire as a stepping stone to a multi-billionaire. Depp is worth a paltry $250M while Musk holds onto $20B.

Enough is never enough!

1 Like

Filing false felony charges and faking evidence are both serious felonies. I hope they max her out as an example.

1 Like

Some recent details emerged from this case is rather disturbing. Apparently she admitted to taking a dump in the bed that they use to share as a practical joke. To me that is a sign of someone who is not all there in the head and has deeper issues than merely being a gold digger!


Nah, his penis did the choosing.


They are both messed up. I can imagine what sort of toxic screwed up relationship it was.

Hope you are staying well during this ongoing craziness.

“… a woman scorned”.

Nobody with an IQ above 75 - no make it 25 - would be the least bit interested in the private life of some hasbeen actor and his spouse. The BBC is absolutely obsessed with what must be the most boring story so far this year.