đź”´ AG William Barr Testifies Before Senate Appropriations Subcommittee


Interesting how the Dems want a totally unredacted document while Barr must follow the law.

Apparently they will not get their way and make it difficult at bst.

Does a federal court contain the authority to inform disclosure of extensive-jury materials if the reflect decides that the pursuits of justice warrant doing so; or is the reflect restricted to the exceptions to very extensive-jury secrecy that are spelled out in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Guidelines of Criminal Route of? The D.C. Circuit’s McKeever ruling holds that the text of Rule 6(e) controls. Which potential, judges like no longer contain any authority to authorize disclosure outdoors the guideline.

That is critical for the Mueller document because Rule 6(e) does no longer contain an exception to secrecy that might per chance allow disclosure to Congress.

The case involves a writer, Stuart McKeever, who used to be researching a e book on the disappearance of Columbia College professor Jesús de Galíndez Suárez in 1956. It used to be suspected that Galíndez, a actually public critic of Dominican Republic dictator Rafael Trujillo, used to be kidnapped and flown to the D.R., where he used to be murdered. One day of a federal investigation, suspicion fell on John Joseph Frank, a aged FBI agent and CIA attorney, who later labored for Trujillo. Frank used to be eventually prosecuted for failing to register as a foreign agent but never charged with any involvement in Galíndez’s execute.

In 2013, for functions of his study, McKeever petitioned the court for beginning of records of the extensive-jury complaints that led to Frank’s 1957 indictment. There might per chance be nothing in Rule 6(e) that might per chance allow the veil of extensive-jury secrecy to be pierced for an instructional or literary study venture. Yet the district reflect asserted that federal courts contain “inherent supervisory vitality” to portray extensive-jury materials, together with those that’re “historically critical.” Finally, on the replacement hand, the reflect denied the petition, reasoning that it used to be “overbroad.”

McKeever appealed. In opposition, the Justice Division argued no longer fully that he desires to be denied the extensive-jury records, but additionally that the lower court had been corrupt to train authority to portray the materials outdoors the strictures of Rule 6(e). The three-reflect panel agreed with the Justice Division, in an belief written by Settle Douglas H. Ginsburg (now a senior reflect, appointed by President Reagan) and joined by Settle Gregory Katsas (appointed by President Trump). Settle Sri Srinivasan (appointed by President Obama) dissented.

The majority outlined that the Supreme Court has lengthy diagnosed the mandatory functions served by extensive-jury secrecy, and thus that secrecy must restful be safe except there is some clear contrary indication in a statute or rule. Disclosure is the exception, no longer the guideline.


This hearing is directed toward budget request items…as was yesterday’s hearing before the House Appropriations Committee.

Hopefully, the Senators will be focused on the budget requests and not the Mueller report. However, I suspect most questions and demands regarding the Mueller report will come from the Democrat Party members.

Right off the bat! The ranking member, Jeanne Shaheen goes directly to the Mueller report.

Who would have thought it! What a bunch of idiots!

Edit 1:
Even the Republican Chairman starts off with a Mueller report question. This stupid bastard should have listened to Barr yesterday.

Edit 2:
…and Shaheen goes again to the Mueller report.

Edit 3:
…and now she’s asking why Barr intends to investigate the root cause of the Mueller investigation. (She’s worried that more Democrats will be caught in the promotion of the witch hunt.)

Edit 4:
Senile Leahy goes back to the Mueller report.

Edit 5:
Even John Kennedy goes to the Mueller report. At least he’s making the argument that the report should be appropriately redacted.

Edit 6:
Jack Reed is another Democrat idiot!

Edit 7:
Senator Chris Van Hollen is also a Democrat idiot.

1 Like

Pretty Carnak of me wouldn’t you say or could be that it’s all they have???