On the contrary, the aid for the investigation IS the bribe.
Is exchanging cash for a loaf of bread a bribe? Technically?
1 Like
The Ukrainian President has stated repeatedly he was not pushed or pressured in any way to conduct the investigations into the Bidens payola scheme. The Ukrainians were also unaware of the flow of aid being paused. Point out the explicit link between the aid and the Biden corruption investigation in the telephone call transcript. You canât. Itâs not there. Manufacturing a charge of bribery is the product of focus group testing not an analysis of the evidence. 
There is an obvious cause for requesting an investigation of Bidenâs payoff scheme unless you are willing to add the Bidens to the list of Democrat elites who openly operate above the rule of law. Oh wait, only Trump should be investigated and investigated and investigated again for the same imaginary offenses. Biden has double secret immunity not just from prosecution but from investigation as well. 
Thatâs because for other reasons, âhe loves Trumpâs assââŚ
As credible witness testimony has revealed, Trumpâs interest in an investigation into Biden went far beyond the single call of July 25th. This was an effort being made over weeks and months. Giulianiâs shadow diplomacy and the very odd situation of Sondland working outside of his jurisdiction in Ukraine to get them to investigate Biden before aid monies were released is a matter of the record.
Isnât it funny that the diarrhea mouthed Giuliani was on all the news shows daily until he found his ass in the hot grease and now heâs AWOLâŚ
The cat that does the best Adam Schiff impersonation!
1 Like
The investigation of Joe Biden for his corruption in Ukraine is driven by the fact that he did it while Vice President of the United States. It is not based on his current position as a candidate running against Trump.
Liberalism is a mental disorder. Useful idiots would just as soon have corrupt politicians in office (as long as they are from the Democrat Party). Hillary Clinton is the prime example of an acceptable corrupt asshole. The entire Deep State wanted her crooked ass to win the White House. Thatâs why Comey let her off the hook. Thatâs why the never-trumpers and the Loony Left want to cancel the 2016 election.
Liberalism is a mental disorderâŚand the afflicted do not realize they are SICK IN THE HEAD!!!
1 Like
The challenge was to show a link between releasing the aid and investigating Biden using the telephone call transcript. Not one word from you in response.
Vague references to some ever expanding conspiracy built solely on second or third hand information or âunderstandingâ arenât evidence of the Democrats newly minted charge of bribery. Itâs a clown show impeachment searching for a charge. Classic Soviet KGB show me the man and Iâll show the crime tactics.
If you have to âexpandâ beyond the phone call and the statements of the participants then letâs subpoena Hunter Biden and the so-called whistleblower so we can see the context behind Trump asking for an investigation and the whistleblowerâs animus toward Trump as well as the help and coaching provided by Schiff and his staff.
1 Like
According to AG Holder he was Obamaâs wing-man 
and liberals just ate that up! 
1 Like
Democrats are already sitting on the evidence theyâll have for impeachment as they move toward public hearings. And many of them say itâs more than enough.
So whatâs your problem?
They have what they want so go for it.
In support of Eisenbergâs position, the Justice Department issued a legal opinion declaring he is âabsolutely immuneâ from testifying, even in an impeachment inquiry, and that allowing him to talk to Congress could jeopardize the separation of powers. âThis testimonial immunity applies in an impeachment inquiry just as it applies in a legislative oversight inquiry,â
And there you have it in a nut shell.
Impeach him, get over it and the drama from the left and the media or is it really about something else???
Thatâs been accomplished by the corroborating testimony of half a dozen career foreign service officials, most of whom hired by Trump. Heâs a fucking criminal. Lock him upâŚlock him upâŚlock him upâŚ
I reminded the libtard of this in post # 115. He has yet to acknowledge it as a double standard.
Why do you have so much difficulty in backing up your claims with links to the actual people that did this?
You seem to brush off every such request for proof of you claims with soon stupid shit like âthatâs been shown many times by many peopleâ.
Show us links where those many people said what you claim they said.
1 Like
He was , a problem just like Gonzales and Barr.
- List item
No, whistleblowers are federally protected, to begin with. And secondly, heâs no longer needed as his complaint has been corroborated by the testimony of multiple witnesses now.
Again you parrot false talking points.
The whistleblowerâs identity cannot be revealed by the IG but there is no prohibition against releasing their name by other officials. Besides, the name has already been widely circulated in the media. Read the statute.
The whistleblower law is designed to allow potentially illegal intelligence operations to be exposed. Telephone conversations between heads of state arenât intelligence operations. Neither does the law provide a platform for partisan bureaucrats to aggregate office rumors and policy differences with the POTUS into a complaint.
We know that Schiff lied about helping the whistleblower create a pretext for impeachment. Itâs a relationship that ought to be examined if the Schiff show had any interest in the truth.
The whistleblower complaint is a collection of office rumors and bureaucrats whining over the POTUS exercising his Constitutional authority to make foreign policy. Thatâs why the challenge was to use the transcript, direct evidence, to prove the charge of bribery. You have yet to even attempt to meet the challenge. 
1 Like
They are only protected against retaliation! What part of that law are you not understanding? Or are you intentionally trying to misrepresent the facts? Nothing in the law that it is stated that they remain anonymous! Your ignorance again is on display here!
The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 , 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal [whistleblowers] who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.
1 Like
Congressional Democrats are not solemnly upholding the Constitution. They are conducting psychological warfare under the pretext of law. They want the president and his supporters those who dared challenge the permanent, elite government class to know they can never win. Stand with us, the message goes, âget on the right side of history,â or suffer the consequences, just like the president you supported. That is not good faith, adversarial politics. That is a form of political oppression.
The fact that the hearsay if the so-called whistlenblower may have been corroborated by other Trump-hating liars does not mean that a single word of what he claimed is true.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Dumb fucking liberals think we actually fall for that failed logic.
The âfederal protectionâ is ONLY for getting fired, not anonymity.