I think it’s rich coming from you when you were asked repeatedly to provide cited sources to back up some of the outlandish claims you made here on this forum. I don’t know why you think you are entitled to such requests if yourself willingly are acting biased and obtuse to acquiesce the same. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids!
Bubba only responds to the people just joining the forum that h knows he can browbeat with his nasty demeanor for those that agree with it.
1 Like
Well that’s putting it mild. But it’s certainly the appeal to most red hatters…
We didn’t hire Trump to be God, just to finally have someone willing to fight back against you Marxist/Progressive/socialist/fascists.
3 Likes
What I find amazing is the leftists here are beyond naive to believe people will just accept the left over throwing the elected government today.
1 Like
Your frustration mirrors my own at your REPEATED refusal to discuss in any logical way the Democrats refusal to adopt the precedents, floor vote and equitable rules, established by previous impeachment inquiries.
There is no dispute the Constitution specifies an outline of impeachment while leaving the specific process up to Congressional rule making. It’s the Democrats and your patent refusal to discuss the rationale for replacing the rules used in previous impeachment inquiries with an investment of dictatorial power in the hyperpartisan and rabidly dishonest Chairman Schiff.
No doubt you will slice and dice this comment to make another of your crude strawman deflection attempts.
Like zealots throughout history Resistance Democrats eagerly slip into political suicide vests , martyrs for the party.
1 Like
The sad part is the dems have turned it truly into kabuki theater by refusing to allow some appear to testify.
My way or the highway.
1 Like
Oh, it’s more than that. Everything has to be approved by Adam the execrable Schiff including WH counsel questions which must be submitted in advance in writing so Adam the dullard can have his staff prepare a script for him to recite. 
Yesterday Schiff interrupted a Republican questioning a witness to coach the witness not to answer if he didn’t have direct knowledge. This was after 2 hours of witnesses presenting nothing but hearsay. When another Republican asked if Schiff was signaling a return to standard Senate rules, the response was Schiff ordering the clock restarted. 
2 Likes
It’s an amazing situation we are seeing.
The dems get to approve al people who will testify, send any line of questioning when to doesn’t suit their needs. Claim second and third hand testimony is factual without direct knowledge sets a whole new standard for impeachment hearings which I’m sure will be used against them when they some day occupy the WH.
Kangaroo court comes to mind.
1 Like
I caught that when it happened. Schiff has to be aware that we see right through his biased, unethical orchestrating of the hearings. Pelosi would be wise to remove that idiot from chairmanship of ANY and ALL committees.
If the Republicans have any balls at all, they will subpoena Schiff to testify before the appropriate Senate committees and shut his ass down…possibly remove his unethical ass from Congress.
I have told you how many times now that they aren’t bound to any previous impeachment processes. What’s odd is that you don’t understand that the constitution is very ambiguous about this. There are no rules, it’s for the house to decide. And should there ever be an impeachment process again down the road someday, that house will not be bound to this houses rules. 
Remember this on your latter mention, the big club want to kill Trump’s sentinels for going after their money pipeline! These traitors scare me the most and they would benefit by removing Trump from office!
These evil cucks don’t care about justice or the American citizen!
Alas, you are quite wrong; his appeal is that he is not one of the current Dem. candidates who want to crater the US economy…
What democrat has said they want to crash the economy???
Medicare for all $107,000,000,000,000 spending would crash the economy.
The validity of an opinion is based on the honesty, experience, and education of the speaker/writer.
I understand what you’re saying here. I’ve long thought that Mitch McConnell is a snake in the grass.
However, I was referring to what happens after the impeachment trial in the Senate fails to remove Trump. Schiff will (if unchecked) seek some other witch hunt to pursue and waste millions more tax payer dollars opposing whatever the President tries to accomplish.
I want his sorry ass OUT OF CONGRESS!
…and I do agree that IF the House brings articles of impeachment, the Senate should allow the trial to play out in order to expose more and more of the actual corruption by the Democrat Party, especially the Obama administration.
1 Like
He shouldn’t have been right?
The point is, Giuliani, Mulvaney and Bolton, all three of whom could provide first hand knowledge, have been blocked by the White House from providing it, all the while the White House is complaining that those witnesses whom are testifying are providing hearsay…
All run by this guy:
Before Russiagate collapsed, Schiff claimed to have seen “ample evidence of collusion in plain sight.” That assertion turned out to be a cynical lie, of course. Then, when an anonymous bureaucrat filed a complaint concerning President Trump’s conduct during a July call with Ukrainian President Zelensky, Schiff emphatically stated that neither he nor his committee had prior contact with the “whistleblower.” This misrepresentation was too much even for the Washington Post , which awarded him four “Pinocchios.” Worst of all, he fabricated part of the Trump–Zelensky transcript as he opened a hearing to investigate the matter.