Smith is closing in.
An indictment is inevitable and that is why Smith was put in place.
The indictment will be in 2024. Likely late summer. Timing has to be perfect for the election.
Doesn’t such contrived justice undermine your election process?
Absolutely.
Another Example:
A former federal election official on Thursday called the $400 million-plus that Mark Zuckerberg spent to help finance local elections a “carefully orchestrated attempt” to influence the 2020 vote — and recommended that all states ban private funding of election offices.
Hans von Spakovsky, a former Federal Election Commission member, said the billionaire Facebook founder’s donations to a pair of nonprofits that doled out the cash to nearly 2,500 counties in 49 states “violated fundamental principles of equal treatment of voters since it may have led to unequal opportunities to vote in different areas of a state.”
The zuck bucks? However one feels about Trump anybody has to be concerned with attempts to pick winners and losers by manipulating elections
2 Likes
There in lies the problem. The dems do it and there is no problem yet if the right does it the outrage begins.
2 Likes
I think this all BS and nothing but a orchestrated take down!
2 Likes
1 Like
Apathy is a nations greatest Achilles heel. It dooms everyone in between.
1 Like
The difference between party where the media has your back and a party where the media has nothing but loathing for you.
2 Likes
Media is just a corporate apparatus mouthpiece who do what they are told. No real news, no real reporting, no real journalism. Wasn’t the news supposed to be what you Americans called the “4th state”? A voice for the people?
2 Likes
The MSM is the voice of the democrat party.
Looking back in history this is one of the first lies of the left and the media:
Forty-four years ago, on Feb 27, 1968, Walter Cronkite, once called the most trusted man in America, ended his half-hour broadcast on the “CBS Evening News” with the observation the Vietnam War was in stalemate\ and negotiations offered the only way out. This was not reporting news but offering an opinion, one that later turned out to be, while wide of reality, self fulfilling.
Whether Cronkite’s observation eventually affected American policy in Vietnam or not, it was one of the first overt cases of liberal bias in TV media. And despite the initial shock of the Tet Offensive, which led to Cronkite concluding that victory in Vietnam was impossible, the most trusted man in America got it wrong.
Years after the Tet Offensive, shortly after the Vietnam War was over, Washington Post reporter Peter Braestrup published a two-volume work called “The Big Story” that suggested media reporting on the Tet Offensive was overly negative and contributed to a psychological defeat of American policy makers and the American public. Col. Harry Summers, who wrote a 2001 review of the book, calls it the best book on Tet and the media’s treatment of it.
Steven Hayward reports the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese suffered massive losses as a result of Tet. But Cronkite and the media firestorm that followed, as well as the burgeoning costs of the war, precluded any strategy of capitalizing on what was a clear communist defeat. Tet might well have been a military victory for America and her allies, but partly thanks to Cronkite and the liberal media, it proved to be a psychological defeat.
1 Like
Very interesting article. The need to sway public perception on the difference of winning and Losing is always an underscore for political power. I don’t think the intent to win the Viet Nam war was ever a consideration. Same reasons apply to other wars that the US decides to fight in.
The US had won the war after the Tet offensive. The Viet Cong, NVA in the south had virtually been destroyed Cronkite’s reporting had swayed public opinion.
The North Vietnamese and Viet Cong paid dearly for their deviation from the guerrilla warfare strategy that had so frustrated U.S. commanders.hy tacked with 85,000 soldiers though out the country. United States Information Agency estimates placed the number of communists dead at 60,000 with 24,000 weapons captured. Never before had the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong suffered such casualties. Moreover the South Vietnamese people rejected the North’s call to rebellion.
U.S. and South Vietnamese casualties numbered 12,727, including more than 2,600 fatalities.
1 Like
Another example:
In the wake of 9/11, millions of Americans were primed for war with somebody anybody on whom could be pinned the blame for what happened that day. Although Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, a majority of Americans believed it did. Any remotely well-informed person knew this was not the case, but the dominant corporate media did nothing to disabuse the nearly two thirds of Americans who believed this. An implied, but never explicitly stated reason for the war was to combat the terrorists alleged to be within the Hussein regime!!!
1 Like
It seems that wanton need for revenge is always met with grief rather than satisfaction. How to appease a angry mob? Give them away or a war?
2 Likes
Because anyone with a functioning brain knows 2020 was … fishy, to say the least. There is no possible way Biden got 81 million votes. 
Even Democrats know 2020 was less than above board… and they are proud of pulling it off.
I am reminded and often revisit the “hanging chad” incident and wonder if that is where it all started. We had our suspicions back then, but then 9-11 happened.
Remember?
1 Like