Personal insults

Just messin with ya Rick. :wink:

It isnā€™t really a ā€œsafe placeā€. More about people with common interests and ways of thinking that keep things congenial.

You guys are Hidden away from open debate on this forum both groups should be made public

Donā€™t be scared homie

First, I ainā€™t your ā€œhomieā€. And second, if it should be made public then talk to the powers that be.

No one should have an issue with straight talk.

Define ā€œstraight talkā€.

Nobody in the Rabbit Hole is hidden away from debate in the public forums. We are free to post anywhere on the siteā€¦except in the GC.

But then, who wants to post in the GC? :rofl:

1 Like

I do not have the qualifications to be deemed a gentleman, nor will I ever :rofl: :wink:

What the hell is the ā€œGentlemanā€™s Clubā€? Is that a place where virtual lap dances happens? :rofl:

Itā€™s a place where conversations are related to ā€œmanlyā€ pursuits.

Like MGTOW? Or mountain men and Grizzly hunters?

Does incivility equate to ā€œstraight talkā€ with you? Youā€™ve espoused a lot of Christian dogma in your brief presence here, so thatā€™s a bit perplexing.

What a whiney thread.

Anyhow - to those interested, in the Gentlemanā€™s Club we post all sorts of stuff. Cars, drinks, BBQ recipes, and pics of hot women. There is a lot of locker room talk there. Itā€™s not for the easily offended which is why itā€™s called the Gentlemanā€™s Club - no pussies allowed :rofl:

1 Like

LOL sounds just like a turkey farm in here, what is all that squawkinā€™ for? Iā€™m going back out to have a smokeā€¦

2 Likes

Is sports a topic discussed there?

Itā€™s basically two safe places you guys can dress it up however you want but you wonā€™t allow people in both of you have rejected my request for entry in the past I hope we can change that and I can become fully fledged member of both groups

The Rabbit Hole sounds like a space where everyone agrees with one another. One of the reasons I checked this site out was because the individual who recommended it said it was robust (ā€˜not for the faint-heartedā€™ lol) but politely so. And thatā€™s how Iā€™ve found it to be thus far.

2 Likes

Thatā€™s the trouble - robust discussion is a subjective term, in that one manā€™s ā€˜robustā€™ is anotherā€™s ā€˜insultingā€™.

1 Like

If you want to trade insults, ok with me. Insults resolve nothing.

If pointing out your hypocrisy is what you consider an insult then it wonā€™t just be me you will feel insulted by.

2 Likes

No, two people robustly debating can do so without calling each other names and PERSONALLY insulting the other, and can actually produce fruit. But itā€™s too difficult for most on Internet political forums. People are more likely to accept an opposing view or yield some ground if they are being respected than they ever would being yelled at, called names, or insulted on a personal level.