Even Newton would’ve understood this concept and his physics get taught in elementary school.
yeah but if my memory serves me well I don’t think that when the apple fell from the tree there was 300k tons of steel and concrete under it
I don’t think he measured the dent left in the ground by the mass of the apple accelerated by gravity in relation to the soil density at that moment either. And he drank mercury. That was pretty gross. lol
As I told you before, building 7 was severely damaged by flaming debris falling through its roof deep into its interior during the first tower collapse.
Black boxes are NOT indestructible. They may have survived the initial impact with the buildings, but there is no reason to think they would survive the collapse of the building. Furthermore, they would have provided no information that is not already known except perhaps what the hijackers flying the plane were saying if they were saying anything at all. Are you suggesting that they were naming names of the plot masterminds while flying into the towers?
Ok so lets get this straight -On 911 2 planes crashed into 2 buildings,’ another one into the Pentagon and one in a field in PA - That means there were 8(supposedly)indestructible black boxes but you don’t think there will be anything useful on them anyway?
So now on 911 not only did 3 buildings collapse in freefall, something that has NEVER happened before(or after) But also on the same day 4 commercial airliners crashed and none of the 8 black boxes have ever been found also something that has NEVER happened before or after
ROFLMFAO
2 Likes
The black boxes were recovered from the plane in Pennsylvania. I don’t know about those from the Pentagon, but nothing of intelligence value was obtained from that record.
Never have 110 story buildings been struck by fully fueled Boeing 757s before. Never have buildings with that unique type of construction (exterior skin as a structural support) experienced the simultaneous fiery destruction of 3-4 floors high up in the structure before. Never has such a great mass, been suddenly dropped onto the undamaged building below it before. Never has the theory of gravity been so dramatically demonstrated before. There are many things about this horrendous incident that have never happened before or since. Your skepticism is fine, but it proves nothing.
And I fail to see why you think this is humorous.
1 Like
Not trying to ‘‘prove’’ anything - told you already that I know that I don’t know anything just asking some 4th grade q’s
What is funny tho is that you seem incapable of seeing the obvious inconsistencies of your argument
Perhaps and perhaps not.
What I have seen from you on this thread is in spite of being provided some very good information from folks who freely share with you what they might charge in excess of $500.00 an hour to, you 'd like to circle back to your premise rather than think and digest.
Their responses to you have been explained in terms of math and physics. Math and physics hold no political affiliation nor do they care about theories.
The actual inconsistencies come directly from you because while they have been explained, you refuse to accept them. Nor have you shown the capacity to refute them (no offense, neither would I on the level of engineering math and physics).
If you genuinely want to understand, just ask. But, if you are going to ask only to not consider the response then stop wasting people’s time and talents.
1 Like
What if the objective was to level and bury building 7 all along? But when the buildings came down so perfectly it left building 7 standing? Ooooooooooooo
My answers and arguments have been precisely consistent. You simply do not possess the knowledge necessary to understand that they are correct. And you are so wed to the conspiracy nonsense that you refuse to accept them as offered.
2 Likes
Don’t be silly. The entire episode is documented by first hand accounts from thousands of people, pictures and video. Are you seriously suggesting that they are all involved in such a far fetched conspiracy? Think about it … the plan was to drop tower 2 on building 7. When that didn’t happen, they sent in a building demolition crew, wired it up with high explosives and brought it down all within a couple of hours. Do you not see how absurd that is?
1 Like
The aircraft fuel was the accelerant that started the fires. The buildings were filled with carpets, plastics, wood, and other flammables so it doesn’t take a genius to understand there was more than enough high temp combustibles present to weaken the steel.
The twins fell due to exactly that, while two other buildings collapsed due to damage they suffered when the twins collapsed.
This may a bit tough for 4th graders to understand but for adults it should be easy.
There isn’t an ounce of truth in anything stated here much less the Links to ■■■ hating nonsense.
Buildings collapse due to fire regularly.
33*64=2,112’
33x8x8=2,112’
What is the acceleration of gravity?
Do you work for NIST by any chance??
You guys all seem to have missed this so I’ll repeat it here…
Ok so lets get this straight -On 911 2 planes crashed into 2 buildings,’ another one into the Pentagon and one in a field in PA - That means there were 8(supposedly)indestructible black boxes but you don’t think there will be anything useful on them anyway?
So now on 911 not only did 3 buildings collapse in freefall, something that has NEVER happened before(or after) But also on the same day 4 commercial airliners crashed and none of the 8 black boxes have ever been found also something that has NEVER happened before or after
ROFLMFAO
The acceleration due to Gravity, usually denoted as “g”, is 9.8m/s^2
What did I miss?
BTW, as you know from ballistics, units count.
Indestructible…
An ontological argument.
Don’t think anyone, even you, is questioning the existence of the black boxes although maybe we should - If they never existed in the first place that would certainly explain why they were never found.
It also raises an awful lot of other questions