Hundreds of thousands of direct eye witnesses of the planes flying into the towers is low IQ propaganda? What does that make your sources of information?
3 Likes
In this case, @TWR is correct. Trump’s statement is bullshit. Trump is not an engineer. Trump is not an architect. Trump is not a physics major. Trump is a multi-billionaire investor and developer.
I loaded fully jetliner such as the two that hit the twin towers, weighs HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF POUNDS and carries THOUSANDS OF POUNDS OF FUEL with it.
Flying at 500 miles per hour, the inertia of such an object would easily make a large hole in a steel outer wall such as clad the towers. The pieces of the airplane dislodged the fireproofing from the interior steel structure and enabled the fire to weaken the steel to the point of permanent deformation which allowed the weight of the floors above the fire to cause collapse of the fire-floor which pancaked and allowed the full weight of the floors above to progressively collapse floor after floor after floor on the way down.
In this case, The Donald is full of shit!
Anyone that believes what he said is gullible and lacking in understanding of physics.
Ah, must silence any detractors in defense of the corporate mainstream media’s propaganda. We all know MSM is the pinnacle of truth. Who do they serve? Who do you serve?
The criminals were just a bit stingy. Even a used private Lear jet would’ve been more convincing if it fell on building 7. At least CGI it. But the demolition of all three buildings was a dead giveaway. What is seen cannot be unseen. Quit being knowitalls. He who knows everything knows nothing.
You’re spouting conspiracy kook BS with no foundation in reality and with not even a single fact to substantiate it.
Every claim that has been made as to another cause other than the planes hitting that day has been completely debunked with hard fact and science.
You don’t need to “know it all” to dismiss idiotic conspiracy theories, you simply need a fundamental understanding, and a very basic one, of physics and material science and do just a bit of research.
Silverstein “Pull It”, and company are not paying you enough.
The deaths of 5 thousand innocent people cry out.
Can’t you hear them?
Lord have mercy on you.
1 Like
What the hell are you even babbling about now?
The F-4 is a very small plane compared to an airliner and it was crashing into a 4’ thick bunker wall of high strength concrete and reinforced steel.
The wall was also designed to move inward on impact to help absorb the force of the collision.
You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about on this subject.
You are the one whose always babbling and lying.
You are just a deceitful troll on this forum.
I’ve seen trolls like you before.
I will not feed you anymore.
Lord have mercy on your wicked soul.
What a pile of BS. If you even think you can ever show me to be lying about anything man up and do so.
Technical Specifications
- F-4 Phantom II Fighter
| First flight | May 27, 1958 (prototype YF4H-1) |
|---|---|
| Wingspan | 38 feet 5 inches |
| Length | 58 feet 3 inches |
| Height | 16 feet 6 inches |
| Ceiling | 56,100 feet |
| Range | 1,750 miles |
| Weight | 55,597 pounds |
| Power plant | Two 17,900-pound-thrust General Electric J79-GE-17 jet engines |
| Speed | 1,485 mph (max.) |
| Accommodation | Two crew |
| Armament | 15,983 pounds of weapons, including 20 mm nose-mounted M-61 “Vulcan” cannon |
Boeing 767
Technical Specs
| 767F | |
|---|---|
| Payload kg (lbs) | 52,480 (115,700) |
| Range nm | 3,255 |
| Length | 54.94 m (180 ft 3 in) |
| Wingspan | 47.57 m (156 ft 1 in) |
| Height | 15.85 m (52 ft) |
I love your posts in “The Comedy Club” … perhaps you should confine your participation to that thread. 
I think the Hasbara guys are getting worried that all the dots are joining up.
They know what will happen if/when it is disclosed that Mossad did 911.
Since it never happened there’s not a chance in hell such a disclosure will ever be made.
Watch out for the tsunami when they find out they been fooled.
1 Like
No worries, you’re not fooling anyone.
1 Like
What is your best evidence that September 11th was an inside job???
Start here
2 Likes
Nothing in that video convinced me that 9/11 was an inside job that does not mean that 9/11 was not a inside job it’s so hard to prove a conspiracy theory
do you have any solid evidence???
If you have no doubts of the government’s official explaination then I would suggest you take the blue pill and you’ll wake up tomorrow in blissful ignorance.
If you can produce any solid evidence that the official story is not the truth present it.
You are jumping the gun here I obviously have doubts about the official explanation or I wouldn’t be asking questions do you have any solid evidence or is it all speculation
when a group of people decide to cover something up it’s hard to prove that they are lying beyond reasonable doubt I would not even consider the video above to be circumstantial evidence
Was it tower 7 that collapsed without being hit by anything and that was reported to have fallen before it had even fallen?? What’s your explanation for that and what is the official explanation??
Building 7 was heavily damaged by debris from the towers and uncontrolled fires brought it down after several days.