You are right and to be honest I dont care enough about the issue. A quick google search showed a ton of results but then we just get into a pissing match of links.
You think judicial watch is a reputable organization and I dont. Neither of us is going to change the others mind.
Suicide watch coming soon !!! 
You care enough about the issue to disparage the great effort they are making to reveal the truth about about the goddamned liberalism that is being promoted to undermine our constitution.
Post just a pound or two of your claimed âton of resultsâ. If youâre afraid your results can be easily debunked, you must realize already that they are not factual.
You appear to be a weak minded, ignorant debater with not enough gumption to back up your opinionated claimsâŚa blowhard fucking idiot.
Go play in traffic, little boy.
Trump was supposed to investigate Hillary while the Mueller witchhunt and the Schiff show were ongoing? No way.
Donât get too excited at the prospect of Hillary finally having to testify under oath. No doubt she has a team of lawyers fighting the court order. The Clintonâs have gotten away with breaking the law for so long itâs expected.
And NOTHING changes In the dirty, dark, deep SWAMP !!!
See also: United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State, 14-1242)
Judge Royce Lamberth ordered the State Department and Judicial Watch to create a plan to uncover whether Hillary Clinton used a private email server as secretary of state to prevent groups from accessing her emails through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The parties were directed to report back to the judge in 10 days.[3]
Lamberth said that Judicial Watch should be allowed access to documents and testimony about Clintonâs use of a private email server and how the federal government handled the release of her emails. He added that Clintonâs email practices were âone of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.â[3]
Lamberth also questioned whether âlawyers at the Justice Department and the State Department misled the court when they tried at the end of 2014 to wrap up Judicial Watchâs FOIA suit about Benghazi talking points even though some officials were aware months earlier that Clinton had tens of thousands of emails on a private system and had agreed to turn many of them over to State at its request,â according to Politico .[3]
*******Lambert wrote, âState played this card close to its chest. At best, Stateâs attempts to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA and hoodwink this court.â[[3]]*****(https://ballotpedia.org/Royce_Lamberth#cite_note-politicoemail-3)
"In fact, as this is written early Tuesday afternoon, stories from right-wing sources about Clintonâs emails represent three of the top 10 and five of the 20 top-performing news stories on Facebook over the past 24 hours. "