Montecrusty the great Cherry picker!
Yeah right. And yet he leads by 7+ million votes and 74 electors. All 50 states have certified this, the electoral college will affirm this Monday, and Trump has had 60 frivolous cases TOSSED, most recently this evening being slapped down by SCOTUSā¦
Joe Biden will be sworn in on January 20th as the 46th president of the United Statesā¦
And yet he defeated Trump in a super landslide. You just witnessed the repudiation of a very despised manā¦
First it was Biden won, then it was a land slide now itās a super landslide. Will it be a super duper landslide tomorrow??
A definition could use: A landslide victory is an election result in which the victorious candidate or party wins by an overwhelming margin. Six states is not an overwhelming margin with the count including fraud close.
In this case, Bidens victory will be tainted as no state has investigated the fraud claimed by the right. But win by any means is the mantra of the left and Joe put it so well:
Joe Biden said his campaign has assembled the āmost extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politicsā in a podcast published Saturday
Seems it may not have been a slip of the tongue after all.
Thatās ridiculous. He won better than 7 million more votes than trump did and secured 306 electoral votes.
When Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million and won 306 electoral votes, he declared it a landslide.
By those margins then, Biden won in a super landslideā¦
Joe Biden will be sworn in on January 20th as the 46th president of the United Statesā¦
Someone should tell tucker Carlson that none of this hunter investigation matters if trump gets cheated
To speak of Kamala Harrisā election as vice-president as a āhistoric āfirstāā isāsadlyāto engage in the absurdity known as identity politics.
Of course, it is also to overlook (rather conveniently, I think) the fact that we recently had an African-American as president for eight years
Regardless of your fealty toward Joe Bidenāand that is really beside the point hereāthe longing for a ānew normalā is utterly repellent to me. (I liked the old normal quite wellāyou know, the one that we all grew up with.)
And I have simply neverānever!āheard the term ānew normalā used as a synonym for improved.
I would not disagree with you as regarding your assessment of Donald Trump as being āamoral, rude, condescending, sophomoric, mean spirited and nasty.ā
But you appear to think that evangelicals should place character traits above all else when selecting a presidentāas though they had no interest in social, political, or philosophical matters.
I simply find that view to be astonishing!
Agreed, I thought simply ānormalā would have fit better when I first read his commentā¦
No, I just think that they should be consistent, or at least say character and morality is important to us when we can get it and if we have to overlook the absence thereof to get what we want we willā¦
Nothing astonishing about itā¦
Why would you view it as ā[in]consistentā for evangelicalsālike everyone elseāto view politics from an exclusively political angleārather than being tinted by oneās religious views?
Jesus said to āgive unto Caesar what is Caesarās, and unto God what is Godās.ā He did not say that we should intermingle the two.
Most evangelicalsāin fact, just about allāstrongly oppose abortion-on-demand.
Do you really believe, then, that they would be more consistent if they supported a candidate with a sterling character, who would nominate federal judges and justices who take the opposite viewārather than one of questionable character, who would nominate judges and justices who wish to limit abortion?
Think about itā¦
I think I was sufficiently clear about that and have stated it multiple times now. So either youāre intentionally obtuse or just plain avoiding that reality.
The inconsistency is blatant. They are not holding the office holder of the presidency to the same standard that they held a previous president. Itās a glaring example of hypocrisyā¦ Thereās not many more ways to express itā¦