That’s the point, you’ve got half a dozen posters here presenting conspiracy theories about the bombing and when confronted, they were just putting it out there for people’s consideration…
There is only ONE conspiracy theory
The one you get from CNN (ConspiracyNewsNetwork)
Everything else is based on fact
2 Likes
Regardless of this situation or the next, people presenting small pieces of evidence is not conspiracy, in the normal world it is how an investigation is carried out, the pieces are put together that forms a bigger picture. I posted a video which shows the initial explosion was not in the location of the RV, so what are we supposed to say & think about that ? Just ignore it because the MSM have already told us their version of what happened ? I realise that may be your reality but having no trust in much of the bullshit they churn out is far from conspiratorial. The net is awash with examples of the media being caught out in their fake news sets, showing kids lying dead (supposedly) following an explosion, for them to jump to their feet once the cameras have stopped rolling and the directors handing out the $20 bills.
1 Like
They were. And the MSM keeps being criticized for reporting what the FBI is telling us about the bomb and bomber. So you can listen to those who are actually investigating this bombing, the guys who found the bomber and have interviewed his friends and neighbors, and searched his house and packed out the bags and bags of evidence to comb in their labs…OR…listen to what the internet keyboard conspiracists are telling you…
And where is your proof???
Could it be The CIA whistleblower complaint that sparked the impeachment inquiry which we all now know was total BS from the demo party?
Could it be that most of the CIA staff are from Ivy League colleges and probably view Trump as a greater evil than Xi Jinping?
Could it be John Brennan to Trump: ‘America will triumph over you’ I suspect you might not like someone who accuses you of venality, corruption and moral turpitude, and who says this not just once but every chance he gets. Is that unbiased from the CIA leadership?
Just a few examples.
Lol, show you what? These things are always contrived by the conspiracist crowd…
You said precisely what you have noted here.
But do you really believe it is odd to suggest that “you certainly seemed to imply that, with your remark that it was premature for anyone to ‘give [someone else’s] conjecture any consideration.’”?
That is certainly the implication that I would derive from that.
But if you claim that this is not what you intended, well, I suppose that I will just have to take you at your word…
I’m not couching it at all, nothing subtle or implied. Just the bold and clear declaration that the people making discovery, the people that found the bomber, confiscated a van load of material from his house to sift through in the lab, those that have interviewed neighbors, friends etc., have yet to put together a motive. Therefore there’s certainly no value to the uninformed conjecture of another conspiracist…
Meanwhile Monte waits to be spoon fed his daily dose of CNN programming.
Up to 60 now and two attempts at SCOTUS where he couldn’t even get his foot in the door…
And yeah, the DOJ/FBI investigated election fraud and concluded there was none so he fired Barr…
Have it your way.
As I said before, I will have to take your word as to what you actually meant…
Well, I would hope you’d take MY word as to what I meant over anyone else’s… Seems I’d be the most qualified to clear such a thing up.
Okay.
Then what are we arguing about, anyway?
You seem sarcastic; and for no apparent reason…
Another thing I’m glad to have cleared up for you…
The bomber is a donnie minion…because donnie didn’t get his way and have the law changed to remove protection for tech companies…ie the front of ATT…