Biden Administration SECRET TALKS

[tt53]

Reports Prove White House Was in Bed With Social Media Companies to Suppress Truthful Information

Most American people are fully aware of the Biden administration’s attempts at censoring information. They even went as far as trying to form a misinformation team that failed as quickly as it even began.

According to newly released documents, the White House was in secret talks with social media companies such as Facebook about censorship and monitoring content on platforms.

In a statement, Schmitt said they have already received several documents that prove the federal government had a relationship with social media companies to censor freedom of speech.

“Clearly coordinate[d] to censor freedom of speech, but we’re not done,” Schmitt said, adding, “the Department of Justice is cowering behind executive privilege and has refused to turn over communications between the highest-ranking Biden Administration officials and social media companies.”

In a joint statement between the two attorney generals, they confirmed that Meta disclosed at least 32 federal officials, including senior officials at the FDA, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, and the White House, “have communicated with Meta about content moderation on its platforms, many of whom were not disclosed in response to Plaintiffs’ interrogatories to Defendants.”

YouTube admitted to 11 federal officials being a part of communications with the White House.
We no longer have truth in reporting and censorship is at a critical stage in American history !!!

[tt53]

BREAKING: Biden admin held weekly censorship meetings with social media giants to suppress COVID and vaccine speech | The Post Millennial

It seems we are now seeing the outlines of how the Fourth Branch of Government are planning to keep control over information, specifically public discussion on Big Tech platforms, even as Elon Musk moves to open the valves of information from the social media platform Twitter.

Many eyebrows were raised as the announcement appeared to be an open admission that the U.S. government was going to control information by applying labels, that would align with allies in social media, who need a legal justification for censorship and content removal.

This CISA announcement was quickly followed by various government officials and agencies saying it was critical to combat Russian disinformation, as the events in Ukraine unfolded.

In essence, Ukraine was the justification for search engines like Google, DuckDuckGo, and social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube to begin targeting information and content that did not align with the official U.S. government narrative.

Previously those same methods were deployed by the U.S. government, specifically the CDC and FDA, toward COVID-19 and the vaccination program. All of this background aligns with the previous visibility of a public-private partnership between the bureaucracy of government, the U.S. intelligence agencies and U.S. social media.

That partnership now forms the very cornerstone of the DHS/CISA effort to control what information exists in the public space. It is highly important that people understand what is happening.

In July of 2021 the first admission of the official agenda behind the public-private partnership was made public.

What we are seeing now is an extension of the government control mechanisms, combined with a severe reaction by all stakeholders to the latest development in the Twitter takeover.
For two years the control mechanisms around information have been cemented by governments and Big Tech. Even the deployment of the linguistics around disinformation, misinformation and malinformation is all part of that collective effort.

The collaboration between the government and Big Tech is not a matter for debate, it is all easily referenced by their own admissions. The current issue is how they are deploying the information controls.
It doesn’t take a deep thinker to see exactly where this is going. Various U.S. government agencies will now define their interests. The definitions will then be transmitted to the officers within big tech and social media, and any entity who dares to challenge that govt definition or govt narrative will be targeted for content removal.

Permitted speech will be defined by government agencies, and the mechanisms for controlling, targeting or removing speech that challenges that narrative will now lead to content removal. The shift here, the part that must be emphasized, is the official justification in the terms and conditions of the social media platform operators will come from U.S. government agencies, not the platform itself.

[Smiley321]

The interesting, and disheartening, aspect of this is that there’s no law that I know of that punishes a government official from censoring things in this way. In fact, it’s been shown repeatedly, there are many ways that it gets rewarded - a promotion in civil service, or a political appointment, or a job doing it in the media.

The only way I see this getting punished is when these organs of propaganda become discredited in the public’s perception, and the public goes elsewhere for information. Don’t hold your breath for that. The public at large will only be moved to that when things really unravel, and by then the important issues will be where to assign blame and who to make a scapegoat.