Notices
 
Like Tree42Likes

Thread: Levin: US government buying up billions of rounds of ammo

Page 8 of 20 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 193
  1. #71
    Debate Guru hoytmonger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    People's Republik of America
    Posts
    2,703
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Rapunzel View Post
    People wonder why some think Obama is a Muslim or the very least a Muslim apologist. All you have to do is look at his record and the wonder goes away if you are honest with yourself.
    Someone that legally changes their name from Barry Soetero to Barak Hussein Obama... a muslim... no way!
    “The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians.”

    ― George Orwell, A Life in Letters
     
     

  2. #72
    Expert Debater
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Eighty Deuce View Post
    Yeah .... "Buy now and save" ........
    Good morning everyone!!

    OK the government has ordered and purchased enough rounds to shoot everyone in America a couple of times over.

    And we know they have a pretty large area to cover with those to be effective if an insurrection does occur so let's see why they need so many in so many places.

    As well we can see what the duly elected government will bring to bear against those of you who can no longer accept the majority rule sysyem of America and decide to attempt to overthrow it with your Glocks and AR-15s.



    As you can see this little darling shoots 4,000 rounds a minute and that makes it very difficult to get 1 or 2 shots to each insurrectionist so many may get hundreds of holes and that would not be fair to the others who deserve their share of killing as well.


    Enjoy your revolt,


    don
     
     

  3. #73
    Administrator 1AmericansView's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    13,503
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    again the progressive has no problem with the Government. killing Americans.

    you can call Americans whatever you want. but in the end they are still Americans.

    and in the end the Government is suppose to work for the Government. not buy enough ammo to use on Americans to kill every American 5 times.

    FT if this was happening under President Bush you would want him hung.

    funny how its okay when its your dictator in office.
    Rapunzel likes this.
    The Constitution protects certain rights.

    You have the right to practice religion freely. (unless you own a business)
    You have the right of freedom of expression (unless you own a business0
    you have the right of freedom of the press (unless you own a business that does not lie for the left)

    now calling out people who constantly LIE. is compared to Bill Clinton taking advantage of a 20 year old.

    Guess I missed the classes on the Constitution where it says you give up your rights when you start a business.

    Very disturbing society when somebody thinks having a spelling mistake is as disgusting as somebody supporting murder torture and kill list because they don't like the sentencing the person received.
     
     

  4. #74
    Administrator 1AmericansView's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    13,503
    Trophies
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    FT did you have a issue with Obama using military action in Libya? or any of the other countries we sent "Aid" to because the Government was killing its people?
    The Constitution protects certain rights.

    You have the right to practice religion freely. (unless you own a business)
    You have the right of freedom of expression (unless you own a business0
    you have the right of freedom of the press (unless you own a business that does not lie for the left)

    now calling out people who constantly LIE. is compared to Bill Clinton taking advantage of a 20 year old.

    Guess I missed the classes on the Constitution where it says you give up your rights when you start a business.

    Very disturbing society when somebody thinks having a spelling mistake is as disgusting as somebody supporting murder torture and kill list because they don't like the sentencing the person received.
     
     

  5. #75
    Debate Guru Rapunzel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,303
    Post Thanks / Like
    Memo From Obama’s Justice Department Says Gun Ban Won’t Work Without Registration And Confiscation…



    Make no mistake, that’s where we are headed assuming Obama and the Dems get their way.

    In this short video from the NRA, an internal Justice Department (the same Justice Department ran by Eric ‘Fast and Furious’ Holder), it is revealed that the Obama administrations own research shows that an assault weapons ban would only be effective with mandatory gun confiscation and that universal background checks would only be effective with federal gun registration.

    Still think grandfathering existing weapons and simple universal background checks sounds like a good idea? Make no mistake, an assault weapons ban of any kind, even with a grandfathering clause is a step towards gun confiscation. Also realize that universal background checks are just the first step the government needs in implementing a federal gun registration, and as history has shown us, federal registration almost always leads to confiscation.

    Still don’t think confiscation is the final goal of the anti gunners? Check out these quotes from Democratic leaders calling for gun confiscation.

    Keep reading…

    Memo From Obama’s Justice Dept Says Gun Ban Won’t Work Without Registration & Confiscation

    When, then, does plunder stop? It stops when it becomes more painful and more dangerous than labor.-Frédéric Bastiat
     
     

  6. #76
    Expert Debater
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    623
    Post Thanks / Like
    It would be impossible for a person to claim a weapon was grandfathered in unless he registered it as being his and in his possession at the time congress passed whatever legislation that regulated it.

    Hell yes a background check should be made at that time to insure he was a legal citizen without any restrictions on firearm ownership.

    There would still be the criminals that would not register or submit to background checks for obvious reasons and the arms would be removed from them just as they are today as they are found and arrested.

    It continues to surprise me the number of you guys who seem to be upset that the criminals might lose the weapons they threaten us with.

    There are those who feel all offensive arms should be removed from the citizens and indeed that was the position until rather recently from NRA leadership. Remember their testimony before Congress about the so called saturday night specials that were regulated then just as the proposals today to regulate those specific weapons named in the legislation.

    There are those in Congress that oppose any regulation of any type on firearms and those who feel some regulation is necessary but debate just how much.

    That is our Representative system of government and the debate in congress will involve a lot of testimony, debate, and hopefully compromise so we can get to a sane set of regulations everyone can accept.

    Crazy uncle Fred will always be with us but with any luck we can get back to where he spouts but doesn't actually get his weapons on the streets killing innocents just because his candidate lost the last election.



    don
     
     

  7. #77
    Expert Debater
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Our evil repressive government.

    Let us look at the reaction of our government when faced with an obvious terroristic threat from a citizen.

    I would say James Yeagher's you tube video saying if congress passed a law he was going to start killing people qualifies as a terroristc threat.

    He was making threats to try to influence legislation that might be considered by our legally elected representives.

    What was the reaction by our overly repressive federal and state governments?

    They sent him an email and a registered letter notifying him his concealed carry permit was being revoked but also said he could appeal that decision in a court or an administrative hearing.

    They did not surround his home or place of business and they did not seize any weapons or even threaten to do so. They did not confiscate the massive arsenal or even attempt to restrict his access to calling for his friends to arm themselves and go on the streets.

    Seems pretty mild a reaction to me.



    don
     
     

  8. #78
    Debate Guru hoytmonger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    People's Republik of America
    Posts
    2,703
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fulltimer View Post
    Good morning everyone!!

    OK the government has ordered and purchased enough rounds to shoot everyone in America a couple of times over.

    And we know they have a pretty large area to cover with those to be effective if an insurrection does occur so let's see why they need so many in so many places.

    As well we can see what the duly elected government will bring to bear against those of you who can no longer accept the majority rule sysyem of America and decide to attempt to overthrow it with your Glocks and AR-15s.



    As you can see this little darling shoots 4,000 rounds a minute and that makes it very difficult to get 1 or 2 shots to each insurrectionist so many may get hundreds of holes and that would not be fair to the others who deserve their share of killing as well.


    Enjoy your revolt,


    don
    Yeah, civilians don't own that kind of firepower...



    That's why the second amendment is so important.
    “The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians.”

    ― George Orwell, A Life in Letters
     
     

  9. #79
    Debate Guru Rapunzel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,303
    Post Thanks / Like
    It continues to surprise me the number of you guys who seem to be upset that the criminals might lose the weapons they threaten us with.
    No Don, we are upset that WE THE PEOPLE, honest civilians might lose their 2nd amendment rights, not the criminal and to write such a line shows you to be nothing but a tool.
    1AmericansView likes this.
    When, then, does plunder stop? It stops when it becomes more painful and more dangerous than labor.-Frédéric Bastiat
     
     

  10. #80
    Expert Debater
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Rapunzel View Post
    No Don, we are upset that WE THE PEOPLE, honest civilians might lose their 2nd amendment rights, not the criminal and to write such a line shows you to be nothing but a tool.

    Perhaps a link to proposed legislation that indicates what you are concerned about might make your concerns a bit more realistic.

    Otherwise your paranoia seems to be getting the better of your judgement.



    don
     
     

Page 8 of 20 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •